Debates
18 Aug 23
INEPTOCRACY - Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) - a system of government where the least capable to lead, are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
I hope this does not make you liberals/socialists uncomfortable, and how could someone write such a thing? Toughen up and strike back.
Y'all make up a few words, could be fun. I would, but I can hardly do better than this one!!
18 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidnext up tomorrow…we discuss the word war
INEPTOCRACY - Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) - a system of government where the least capable to lead, are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
I hope this does not make you l ...[text shortened]... k.
Y'all make up a few words, could be fun. I would, but I can hardly do better than this one!!
seems there have been hundreds of wars we werent privy to😂
18 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidPerfectly describes Trump's Cabinet secretaries.
INEPTOCRACY - Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) - a system of government where the least capable to lead, are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
I hope this does not make you l ...[text shortened]... k.
Y'all make up a few words, could be fun. I would, but I can hardly do better than this one!!
18 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidSo the owning classes taking from the producing classes. The same as capitalism then…
?
Not at all. It is about the non-productive taking from the productive. You sure do miss issues.
18 Aug 23
@shavixmir saidI'm sure you have a point of discussion, but what do you mean 'owning' classes? That is not mentioned in the definition quoted in the OP. Or, are you doing the ole issue switcheroo?
So the owning classes taking from the producing classes. The same as capitalism then…
18 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidThat would be Kleptocracy.
?
Not at all. It is about the non-productive taking from the productive. You sure do miss issues.
In that case, it would be about the Trump Grifting Crime Family.
18 Aug 23
@suzianne saidYeah, I guess you could settle into the ole lib redefining, kleptomania, which is Stealing things...You know, nobody is looking! Man, we are LOOKING, and the non-productive are not stealthy, ashamed or in any way feeling guilty. They just take. You fellers write about taking from them that have all the time.
That would be Kleptocracy.
In that case, it would be about the Trump Grifting Crime Family.
But this is not kleptomania.
18 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidHahaha you hope it does not make us uncomfortable, well it is a bit uncomfortable witnessing your total lack of self awareness, but I can live with it Joe 😂
INEPTOCRACY - Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) - a system of government where the least capable to lead, are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
I hope this does not make you l ...[text shortened]... k.
Y'all make up a few words, could be fun. I would, but I can hardly do better than this one!!
@kevcvs57 saidSorry I made you uncomfortable
Hahaha you hope it does not make us uncomfortable, well it is a bit uncomfortable witnessing your total lack of self awareness, but I can live with it Joe 😂
Just that you replied as you did makes you, I hate to say it, a socialist. Marauder will have a cocktail party for you. (leave your wallet at home if you are not yet fully committed)
18 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidSo by not accepting your critique of me I confirm your critique of me, that’s handy, halfwit
Sorry I made you uncomfortable
Just that you replied as you did makes you, I hate to say it, a socialist. Marauder will have a cocktail party for you. (leave your wallet at home if you are not yet fully committed)
19 Aug 23
@earl-of-trumps saidNaaa. a nice really smart guy, just overly emotoional. A common trait with these people. He is part of a president who spent more money in Hawaii on climate change policy than on mitigation. They were focused on the 'new energy'. Solar and wind power, but not stopping to deal with what they knew about.....that a fire was likely
I'll give you my critique of you, idiot.
you're an idiot.
He is part of a president who, because we are no longer energy independent, has caused huge inflation.
19 Aug 23
@averagejoe1 saidInflation, in this case driven by greedflation, is caused by the corporations YOU enable.
Naaa. a nice really smart guy, just overly emotoional. A common trait with these people. He is part of a president who spent more money in Hawaii on climate change policy than on mitigation. They were focused on the 'new energy'. Solar and wind power, but not stopping to deal with what they knew about.....that a fire was likely
He is part of a president who, because we are no longer energy independent, has caused huge inflation.
Remember, they're doing just fine, even if you're not. Why do you support them again?