The USA is a plutocracy, not a real democracy. If you want elections to be fair abolish SUPER PACs. Until you make a decent effort to do that stop complaining about election denialism. If you think elections were ever fair you are silly.
https://apicciano.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2012/02/22/the-plutocracy-at-work-millionaire-super-pac-donors/
@metal-brain saidSo do you want to enlighten us about the errors of
The USA is a plutocracy, not a real democracy. If you want elections to be fair abolish SUPER PACs. Until you make a decent effort to do that stop complaining about election denialism. If you think elections were ever fair you are silly.
https://apicciano.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2012/02/22/the-plutocracy-at-work-millionaire-super-pac-donors/
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/08-205
(This is the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, where the Supreme Court decided some points.)
You can bring a new case if you want to, the court has changed and so can precedence (as exemplified by the reversal of Roe vs. Wade)
1 edit
@ponderable saidThe same court that ruled torture is not cruel and unusual punishment and that corporations are people?
So do you want to enlighten us about the errors of
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/08-205
(This is the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, where the Supreme Court decided some points.)
You can bring a new case if you want to, the court has changed and so can precedence (as exemplified by the reversal of Roe vs. Wade)
https://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate-personhood/
Wrong SCOTUS decisions have been overturned before, but all of the SCOTUS justices were appointed by corrupt puppet presidents. They were hand picked by the elites so good luck with that.
https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/a-short-list-of-overturned-supreme-court-landmark-decisions
"You can bring a new case if you want to"
They would never hear the case if it was brought to them. You need at least 4 justices to vote to hear the case. It is called the rule of four. The federal reserve system is unconstitutional too, but they would not dare accept a case against it.
@metal-brain saidSo what exactly is your suggestion?
The same court that ruled torture is not cruel and unusual punishment and that corporations are people?
https://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate-personhood/
Wrong SCOTUS decisions have been overturned before, but all of the SCOTUS justices were appointed by corrupt puppet presidents. They were hand picked by the elites so good luck with that.
https://constitutionc ...[text shortened]... he federal reserve system is unconstitutional too, but they would not dare accept a case against it.
the problem is known and you yourself claim that nothing can be done about legally. So what do you suggest?
@ponderable saidI never said that. Stop lying.
So what exactly is your suggestion?
the problem is known and you yourself claim that nothing can be done about legally. So what do you suggest?
@metal-brain saidWhat’s up Ivan are these super pacs now turning on your boy Trump 😂😂
The USA is a plutocracy, not a real democracy. If you want elections to be fair abolish SUPER PACs. Until you make a decent effort to do that stop complaining about election denialism. If you think elections were ever fair you are silly.
https://apicciano.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2012/02/22/the-plutocracy-at-work-millionaire-super-pac-donors/
@ponderable saidThat doesn't prove what you said. Stop pretending the SCOTUS is the only legal route. Less than stupid people know better.
to remind your memory:
They would never hear the case
@kevcvs57
Still not reading the relevant material I see. You must like being in the dark about everything.
@metal-brain saidI never read any of your BS links partly because because they are BS and partly because they vary rarely say what you claim they say
@kevcvs57
Still not reading the relevant material I see. You must like being in the dark about everything.
@metal-brain saidSo please put forward your suggestions.
That doesn't prove what you said. Stop pretending the SCOTUS is the only legal route. Less than stupid people know better.
@kevcvs57 saidSo you don't want to know if you are wrong. It would diminish your cognitive dissonance. In other words, confuse you with facts.
I never read any of your BS links partly because because they are BS and partly because they vary rarely say what you claim they say
@ponderable saidI am just saying SCOTUS doesn't make the laws. Congress does that. You made a false assertion.
So please put forward your suggestions.
@metal-brain saidI know from experience that you are wrong either by deceit or idiocy possibly a combination of both.
So you don't want to know if you are wrong. It would diminish your cognitive dissonance. In other words, confuse you with facts.
The very fact that you claim a thing tells that the thing is nonsense, did you think we wouldn’t notice your constant lies and stupidity?
@metal-brain saidIn fact I didn't you could quote me. The SCOTUS ruled that the SUPER PACS are in accordance with the constitution.
I am just saying SCOTUS doesn't make the laws. Congress does that. You made a false assertion.