Go back
ACORN going down!

ACORN going down!

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
Wrong as usual! Nice attempt to derail another thread!
They have been[b] found guilty of voter fraud
not merely accused maliciously as you contend.
If you do not like the topic do not participate in the discussion.But, do not sit there and pontificate "why should we give your OP any credence?"


"The Nevada field director of the Association o

http://www.therightperspective.org/2009/08/20/acorn-leader-pleads-guilty-to-voter-fraud/[/b]
ACORN ALERT!!!!!!

HOUSE VOTES TO DE-FUND ACORN
Posted: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:20 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: Congress
From NBC's Luke Russert
The House, in a motion to recommit attached to the student loan bill, has voted overwhelmingly to de-fund ACORN.

It was a bipartisan vote, with more than 300 members voting for the measure. (We'll get the full numbers/vote breakdown shortly.)

This goes further than the Senate did; the Senate took money out of one bill. This is to de-fund the group completely -- for any money the House would appropriate.

*** UPDATE *** House Minority Whip Eric Cantor's office just sent around this statement:

“ACORN has violated serious federal laws, and today the House voted to ensure that taxpayer dollars would no longer be used to fund this corrupt organization. All federal ties should be severed with ACORN, and the FBI should investigate its activity. This united Republican effort to defund ACORN is a victory for the rule of law and taxpayers across the country.”

*** UPDATE 2 *** The vote was 345-75.

NOTICE THE SOURCE "LEFTIES"
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/17/2073493.aspx

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Yes they were accused of voter fraud. But by whom? It was ACORN that reported the said fraud to the electoral authorities. In such circumstances why does it matter that they they were accused of voter fraud? If this is the best you've got in terms of acusatory integrity, why should we give any of your OP any credence?
It wasn't even voter fraud, it was voter registration fraud. And there was no ill intent accept for lazy, low paid temps trying to get out of work.

A show of hands for who's worried Mickey Mouse or the offensive line for the Cowboys stole the election?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
How are you unaware? Its spelled out in the OP !
You saw ACORN,the kool aid kicked in, and you start spouting your liberal rhetoric with out knowing the facts. BRAINWASHED!!!
Give the guy a break. He obviously doesn't waste his life watching FoxNews and reading rightwing PAC spam mail 24/7.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by telerion
Give the guy a break. He obviously doesn't waste his life watching FoxNews and reading rightwing PAC spam mail 24/7.
Hah, hah thats a good one! 🙂 But, you do have a point. Our little hero should sit back and digest what he is reading before he jumps in w/ his partisan statist rhetoric.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
[an official] pleaded guilty to conspiracy for organizing a scheme that illegally paid workers to register new voters.
But that isn't the same as being "found guilty of voter fraud". Your OP is misleading. Why can't you just post credible stuff that people can trust and that can form the basis of informed debate? One wonders if your OP stuff about Hannity interviewing someone has any credibility either. Do you actually know what "voter fraud" is?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Scriabin was a wise man.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by joe beyser
Scriabin was a wise man.
He's still alive, you know. In fact, I'm in the middle of a game with him.

What does he have to do with this thread?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
But that isn't the same as being "found guilty of voter fraud". Your OP is misleading. Why can't you just post credible stuff that people can trust and that can form the basis of informed debate? One wonders if your OP stuff about Hannity interviewing someone has any credibility either. Do you actually know what "voter fraud" is?
It is not misleading to those who understand the english language.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
It is not misleading to those who understand the english language.
Not a very convincing retort, I'm afraid.

You said ACORN was "found guilty of voter fraud". Can you provide an example of this? The Nevada case you cited is not one.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Not a very convincing retort, I'm afraid.

You said ACORN was "found guilty of voter fraud". Can you provide an example of this? The Nevada case you cited is not one.
you're playing symantics

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
you're playing symantics
No I am not. I am demonstrating that you said something untrue in your OP. You say untrue things in many of your OPs. I demonstrate it over and over again.

Do you know what "voter fraud" is?

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
No I am not. I am demonstrating that you said something untrue in your OP. You say untrue things in many of your OPs. I demonstrate it over and over again.

Do you know what "voter fraud" is?
There is absolutley nothing I said untrue in my OP. Now or ever. I leave the lying and spins to you my impish little s.e. asian/british gender bending friend.
I suggest you read it again.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
There is absolutley nothing I said untrue in my OP.
I suggest you read it again.
You said ACORN was "found guilty of voter fraud".

Now, you either have an example of this, or you don't.

At present you don't.

The fact that you cited something that was not an example of "voter fraud" but an example of something else, and your continuing refusal to provide a valid example of ACORN being "found guilty of voter fraud" makes your OP deceitful.

Vote Up
Vote Down

OP-from page 1

"The Senate voted Monday to block the Housing and Urban Development Department from giving grants to ACORN, a community organization under fire in several voter-registration fraud cases.

The 83-7 vote would deny housing and community grant funding to ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

The action came as the group is suffering from bad publicity after a duo of conservative activists posing as a prostitute and her pimp released hidden-camera videos in which ACORN employees in Baltimore gave advice on house-buying and how to account on tax forms for the woman's income. Two other videos, aired on the FOX News Channel, depict similar situations in ACORN offices in Brooklyn and Washington, D.C.

The Senate's move would mean that ACORN would not be able to win HUD grants for programs such as counseling low-income people on how to get mortgages and for fair housing education and outreach.

Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., said that ACORN has received $53 million in taxpayer funds since 1994 and that the group was eligible for a wider set of funding in the pending legislation, which funds housing and transportation programs.

I am curious to hear opinions and/or defense of this corrupt organization that is bilking tens of millions of dollars from the American tax payer.

Will are revered President who has close ties w/this group finally come out and denounce them or remain silent?"

Point out one thing in here that is a lie,misleading,or deceitful!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
OP-from page 1
Sorry, I was referring to your post on page 2.