I mean, seriously, they are celebration of a version of women that no longer is desirable nor correct: A stupid, childish-laughing cow attractive on the outside and empty on the inside; a celebration of passive decorativeness and major stupidity.
Hey, with all the access we have nowadays to fleshy stimulus (ranging from the lowest and most vulgar porn to the most gorgeous and timeless erotic art) it is not even arousing nor entertaining at all to see those ladies, for crying out loud!
Plus, the money wasted on those events could be used in muuuuch better things that really achieve world peace*
Debate.
* Read that phrase with a high pitch, childish, stupid voice.
My wife was part of pageants most of her entire life. Her retarded mother would dress her up like a doll and make her perform in front of people who couldn't care less who she was. She never won, probably because she had a scar on her face the entire time she was a teenager (miraculously now it is gone and she is friggin hot). The one pageant I saw her in, her very last one, gave me the sense that it gave her a false sense of belonging and values that didn't agree with real life. Besides that, most of the other girls in the pageant were devoid of any desirable personality traits and annoying as hell to be around.
On the flip side, she said that she always enjoyed them because of the choreographed dance movements and the positive attitudes she always received from it. Also, she was always very involved in her platform (the cause that she champions while being a contestant), which has always been a definite plus to her.
So, all in all, in my opinion, they are a waste of time.
Originally posted by SeitseYour topic is bizarre and you should know better. Why do you think Mexican TV is so successful? Beautiful women will always be in style!
I mean, seriously, they are celebration of a version of women that no longer is desirable nor correct: A stupid, childish-laughing cow attractive on the outside and empty on the inside; a celebration of passive decorativeness and major stupidity.
Hey, with all the access we have nowadays to fleshy stimulus (ranging from the lowest and most vulgar porn to t ...[text shortened]... world peace*
Debate.
* Read that phrase with a high pitch, childish, stupid voice.
Originally posted by SeitseYoure gay , right ?
I mean, seriously, they are celebration of a version of women that no longer is desirable nor correct: A stupid, childish-laughing cow attractive on the outside and empty on the inside; a celebration of passive decorativeness and major stupidity.
Hey, with all the access we have nowadays to fleshy stimulus (ranging from the lowest and most vulgar porn to t ...[text shortened]... world peace*
Debate.
* Read that phrase with a high pitch, childish, stupid voice.
seitse is right, that show only displays women as idiotic, superficial dolls. It states that a womans role is purely decorative. It is outdated and pointless.
Sure it is nice to see hot babes in swimsuits and sure it is funny to see miss America fall on her buns. And sure it is funny to hear them say what they are there for, and how they want to cure diseases and help children and make za world a better places.
But to watch that show for more than 10 minutes gets boring. These pageants are equally degrading to women as porn is. However porn it's less hypocritical, it states loud and clear that women are objects and it gets straight to the point. A porn star is never asked if she wants to cure cancer and then asked to take her clother off
Originally posted by ZahlanziAfter all that women have acheived in the last 50 years in every imaginable field, including becoming heads of state, you think that one show makes womens role purely decorative ? How do you figure that ?
It states that a womans role is purely decorative. It is outdated and pointless.
And what makes it outdated and pointless ? As far back as we have historical records, women's role have always had element decorativeness.
Is there something in your religion (islamic maybe) that is causing your biased viewpoint ?
Originally posted by ZahlanziOh really ?
These pageants are equally degrading to women as porn is. However porn it's less hypocritical, it states loud and clear that women are objects and it gets straight to the point. A porn star is never asked if she wants to cure cancer and then asked to take her clother off
Which would you prefer your mother or daughter to be :
1. Skinned up naked in a porn movie or
2. nicely dressed as Miss Romania in a beauty pagent ?
If you answer #1, I will know that you are screwed up mentally.
Originally posted by Rajk999Exactly those advances that you correctly mention in the struggle for
After all that women have acheived in the last 50 years in every imaginable field, including becoming heads of state, you think that one show makes womens role purely decorative ? How do you figure that ?
And what makes it outdated and pointless ? As far back as we have historical records, women's role have always had element decorativeness.
Is there something in your religion (islamic maybe) that is causing your biased viewpoint ?
gender equality make even more obsolete the beauty contests, mate.