@suzianne saidthe only email doctored was by an fbi agent, and they let him off with a slap on the wrist.
No, for distributing doctored Russian emails, furthering the Russian attempt to interfere in the 2016 election.
And why are you bringing up MBS?
Oh yeah, your favorite tactic of misdirection.
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/29/962140325/ex-fbi-lawyer-sentenced-to-probation-for-actions-during-russia-investigation
@no1marauder said$600 is not rich 🙄
The proposal is no big deal; "banks are already required to send a 1099 to their customers and the IRS on any account that earns just $10 of interest or more. " https://time.com/6106301/irs-tax-bank-reporting-biden/
"The Biden Administration wants banks to send taxpayers and the IRS an updated form that will contain only two additional numbers: total deposits and total ...[text shortened]... who will be adversely effected are rich folks who want to cheat on their taxes like they already do.
@Metal-Brain
Which proves Biden's point, the rich need to pay their fair share.
If a dude making 20,000 a year gets a 20% tax so 4,000 tax bill, leaving him with 16K.
A billionaire taxed at 20% still has at least 800 MILLION in the tank.
That means nothing?
@mott-the-hoople saidWhat does that have to do with the subject at hand? I'm not a tax expert, but the ones cited in the article seem to disagree with whether what the Bidens took as salary from their S corporations was "reasonable" or not. If right wingers want to close the loophole and make distributions from S Corporations liable for Medicare tax I'm all for it. Is that what you are proposing?
like this guy?
https://nypost.com/2021/09/23/biden-could-owe-as-much-as-500k-in-irs-taxes-report/
@mott-the-hoople said(Shrug) A House proposal would have applied the law to accounts with $10,000 or more. Is that acceptable to right wingers?
$600 is not rich 🙄
@sonhouse saidWhat are you talking about?
@Metal-Brain
Which proves Biden's point, the rich need to pay their fair share.
If a dude making 20,000 a year gets a 20% tax so 4,000 tax bill, leaving him with 16K.
A billionaire taxed at 20% still has at least 800 MILLION in the tank.
That means nothing?
Your math is stupid because it is unintelligible. Explain something people can understand.
@no1marauder saidMarauder, not to dilute your argument(s), but if it is 'already going on', why do they need to hire 80,000 more agents??? Just a question, I am glad you are there to show us if that is logical.
The proposal is no big deal; "banks are already required to send a 1099 to their customers and the IRS on any account that earns just $10 of interest or more. " https://time.com/6106301/irs-tax-bank-reporting-biden/
"The Biden Administration wants banks to send taxpayers and the IRS an updated form that will contain only two additional numbers: total deposits and total ...[text shortened]... who will be adversely effected are rich folks who want to cheat on their taxes like they already do.
@metal-brain saidThe funny thing is, certain points in your post are actually spot on.
No, he stood up courageously to the (NSA) violators of the 4th constitutional amendment. That makes him a hero. A decent president would pardon him and ASSANGE too. Do you get off knowing Assange is being tortured?
BTW, you are defending constitutional overreach GW Bush is responsible for. Why don't you just admit you love Bush and the police state he gave you? Democra ...[text shortened]... bama loves GW Bush, why shouldn't you?
Let the secret love affair between you and Bush flourish.
Obviously you end up so off point and bogged down in mantra, that even Gandalf couldn’t save your ring.
But, it does make it even stranger you generally post complete moronity.
@averagejoe1 saidBecause merely getting reports isn't sufficient for enforcement; you need agents to read those reports and trigger audits based on them. The odds of being audited this year is 1 in 220; a decade ago it was 1 in 90. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/08/attention-taxpayers-irs-audits-have-fallen-significantly.html
Marauder, not to dilute your argument(s), but if it is 'already going on', why do they need to hire 80,000 more agents??? Just a question, I am glad you are there to show us if that is logical.
The hiring of more agents would allow more enforcement of already existing tax laws.
@mott-the-hoople saidSuzianne said “Rich tax cheats aren’t the only tax cheats”.
like this guy?
https://nypost.com/2021/09/23/biden-could-owe-as-much-as-500k-in-irs-taxes-report/
This is Mott’s response.
(But then, Biden himself is rich! )
@Metal-Brain
If you stopped with the marijuana your brain might start working again. That is if the aluminum foil top hat doesn't get in the way.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@shavixmir saidEven a stopped clock is right twice a day.
The funny thing is, certain points in your post are actually spot on.
Obviously you end up so off point and bogged down in mantra, that even Gandalf couldn’t save your ring.
But, it does make it even stranger you generally post complete moronity.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@no1marauder said.............'Ya think?
Because merely getting reports isn't sufficient for enforcement; you need agents to read those reports and trigger audits based on them. The odds of being audited this year is 1 in 220; a decade ago it was 1 in 90. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/08/attention-taxpayers-irs-audits-have-fallen-significantly.html
The hiring of more agents would allow more enforcement of already existing tax laws.
@sonhouse saidYou need to smoke some if you have never heard of the pandora papers.
@Metal-Brain
If you stopped with the marijuana your brain might start working again. That is if the aluminum foil top hat doesn't get in the way.
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/10/pandora-papers-reveal-offshore-finances-global-elite-currying-influence-in-us/?__cf_chl_captcha_tk__=pmd_UUG9.ZrjvNKMwDv6UJPw8I6gOG1twmhlT39bqkODWl4-1634387843-0-gqNtZGzNA6WjcnBszQf9
Biden continued trump's tax cuts. He is a DINO. You voted for another republican pretending to be a democrat.
Smoke some to get your brain up to speed.
@metal-brain saidBiden is President, not Supreme Dictator; he can't unilaterally end Trump's tax cuts.
You need to smoke some if you have never heard of the pandora papers.
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/10/pandora-papers-reveal-offshore-finances-global-elite-currying-influence-in-us/?__cf_chl_captcha_tk__=pmd_UUG9.ZrjvNKMwDv6UJPw8I6gOG1twmhlT39bqkODWl4-1634387843-0-gqNtZGzNA6WjcnBszQf9
Biden continued trump's tax cuts. He is a DINO. You voted for another repu ...[text shortened]... .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCZZAyRKYDg&t=19s
Smoke some to get your brain up to speed.
Biden's proposed legislation would increase the top rate for individuals, raise the corporate tax rate and make capital gains for those making over $1 million taxable at the same rate as other income. All are directly repeals of features of the 2017 tax cuts. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-tax-increase-rich/
Could you tell me how many Republicans in political office support any of those proposals?