Go back

"Biden says China is ‘not competition for us,’ prompting pushback from both parties"

Debates

2 edits


@Duchess64

Oh dear, looks like Chinese collusion to me.


Biden touches little girls.

1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
To what extent can the USA adapt to a changing world in which it may no longer be the only superpower?

To a large extent. Despite some economic downturns, the USA grew and thrived as a nation for over 200 years, from 1776 through the fall of the U.S.S.R. The USA has a long history of adapting to a changing world, and does not need to be the only superpower on earth.


i take it we’ve given up on the dream of a world where there are no superpowers. Where individuals and businesses trade under a globally accepted set of rules, in a war of any kind the poor suffer disproportionately and that is true of nations as well as people.


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Military hegemony is an anachronism.

As Alan Alda's West Wing character once said in a great debate episode, you don't have to fight for resources. You just have to pay for them.

Trade deficits and job outsourcing are certainly important economic issues, but:

1. It's not clear those things are necessarily bad; and
2. To the extent they are, they can be fixed by policy

The global economy is not a zero sum game; policies can benefit both the US and China.


The post that was quoted here has been removed
the qustion that begs to be asked...what do you expect from biden? he an idiot!


@mott-the-hoople said
the qustion that begs to be asked...what do you expect from biden? he an idiot!
Unintended self-irony is awesome.

1 edit

@chessturd said
Biden touches little girls.
No, I'm pretty sure he touches everyone, it just seems like he prefers girls.

It's like my dog, he prefers to hump certain legs but at the end of the day he will take what is available.

But it's all normal you see.

1 edit


@kevcvs57 said
i take it we’ve given up on the dream of a world where there are no superpowers. Where individuals and businesses trade under a globally accepted set of rules, in a war of any kind the poor suffer disproportionately and that is true of nations as well as people.
You on SOROSs payroll?


The post that was quoted here has been removed
The question is: Once having tasted close to absolute power, can the USA learn
to be satisfied with less? Can the genie be put back into the bottle?


The short answer is "yes" and the reason for this is because the rock in space we call earth is not big enough for 2 superpowers that have the weaponry of America to go to war, if they did, there would be no life left on earth at all. The Mutually Assured Destruction or MAD scenario that existed during America's cold war with the USSR would exist with China as well. Introducing 1, 2 or even 3 new superpowers into the mix would not change this.


The post that was quoted here has been removed
The US became a superpower when they defeated Spain.



The post that was quoted here has been removed
I agree with your overall point, but do you really mean the Imperial German Navy? Surely you mean la Royale - the French Navy?