@averagejoe1 saidLol Fox News so it must true huh 😂
Are you fellers sure you want to be typecast with these losers??
https://www.foxnews.com/us/boston-university-law-students-offered-therapy-response-recent-supreme-court-decisions
Do you know the difference between being offered something and asking for, or utilising an option?
I imagine they are being offered financial advice as well, is that ok with you grandma
@kevcvs57 saidAhhhhh, but why would therapy be offered? What would prompt something so absolutely pitiful? Outward crying possibly.
Lol Fox News so it must true huh 😂
Do you know the difference between being offered something and asking for, or utilising an option?
I imagine they are being offered financial advice as well, is that ok with you grandma
Hey. Whom would you say those people needing therapy are more like? You, or me? Absolutely pitiful.
As to FOX News, ...suzianne..., all they did was report a fact. So, the actual question is, is the fact true?
@averagejoe1 saidMore people need therapy than seek it out.
Ahhhhh, but why would therapy be offered? What would prompt something so absolutely pitiful? Outward crying possibly.
Hey. Whom would you say those people needing therapy are more like? You, or me? Absolutely pitiful.
As to FOX News, ...suzianne..., all they did was report a fact. So, the actual question is, is the fact true?
Basically because of people like you stigmatizing it.
@averagejoe1 saidWhy?
Uhhhh, are you so blatantly avoiding the issue? Why don't you link us to Psych 101.
You'd all be like "tl;dr".
@suzianne saidI hate it that the thread is lost with the Suzianne. Is she one of the people needing therapy? I know she was SO unhappy with the (constitutional) judges making rulings that do not fit her fancy. If they listen to Suzy, they will be doling out money left and right!!! Money money. Other peoples' money! Suzy wants the person who stacks dishes at my deli to have their taxes go to college grads. Suzi wants the person who stacks cardboard boxes at my box factory to have their taxes go to college grads. Suzi and Marauder think this is all OK.. They base their logic.....get this, now, they base their logic, such as it is, on their socialistic mind-sets. Suzie and Marauder, sitting in a tree...........
Why?
You'd all be like "tl;dr".
@averagejoe1 saidOnce you pay money to people, it's no longer yours. Even if it's to the tax man.
I hate it that the thread is lost with the Suzianne. Is she one of the people needing therapy? I know she was SO unhappy with the (constitutional) judges making rulings that do not fit her fancy. If they listen to Suzy, they will be doling out money left and right!!! Money money. Other peoples' money! Suzy wants the person who stacks dishes at my deli to have their ...[text shortened]... c, such as it is, on their socialistic mind-sets. Suzie and Marauder, sitting in a tree...........
@averagejoe1 saidConstitutional judges?? These SC judges?? Are you serious??
I hate it that the thread is lost with the Suzianne. Is she one of the people needing therapy? I know she was SO unhappy with the (constitutional) judges making rulings that do not fit her fancy. If they listen to Suzy, they will be doling out money left and right!!! Money money. Other peoples' money! Suzy wants the person who stacks dishes at my deli to have their ...[text shortened]... c, such as it is, on their socialistic mind-sets. Suzie and Marauder, sitting in a tree...........
These megalomaniacs have tossed out all precedent, like their own opinions are the only ones worth having. Constitutional, my butt!
@averagejoe1 saidFox News never reports facts Joe how can one man be this stupid.
Ahhhhh, but why would therapy be offered? What would prompt something so absolutely pitiful? Outward crying possibly.
Hey. Whom would you say those people needing therapy are more like? You, or me? Absolutely pitiful.
As to FOX News, ...suzianne..., all they did was report a fact. So, the actual question is, is the fact true?
@suzianne saidThe Supreme Court is not required or even expected to follow precedent. If they did, there would be (almost) no point in having a Supreme Court. I don't think too many people were broken up over the discarding of precedents like Plessy v. Ferguson and Bowers v. Hardwick.
Constitutional judges?? These SC judges?? Are you serious??
These megalomaniacs have tossed out all precedent, like their own opinions are the only ones worth having. Constitutional, my butt!
@sh76 saidThankyou. Sue won’t listen to me. Sue, who fancies herself a victim, will stir up next to nothing for reasons unknown to us.
The Supreme Court is not required or even expected to follow precedent. If they did, there would be (almost) no point in having a Supreme Court. I don't think too many people were broken up over the discarding of precedents like Plessy v. Ferguson and Bowers v. Hardwick.
And don’t libs preach that the constitution is outdated, throw it in the trash bin? They do, so it would follow that SCOTUS would NOTfollow precedence, which preceding rulings were based on that very constitution.
Sue is of angst, thus skewed in her conflict of comments. Hard to follow. 😕