Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboardI've heard that he is going to conscript the poor black people of New Orleans who are displaced to dig the trenches for this pipeline. Can you comment on that?
Watch micheal moore's latest movie, they are laying the pipelines as we speak. He's going to pump every drop of oil out of there.
Looters aim to satisfy their own interests (possibly including their families and friends).
Bush had personal financial interests in Iraq - both oil and military equipment.
Looters take advantage of other people's defenses being down while they suffer.
Bush used Saddam as a smoke screen to access Iraqi oil
Looters hurt other people.
Bush is ultimately responsible for up to 100,000 deaths in Iraq
Looters break the law.
Bush went against international law.
Some say that looters should be shot.
I say that Bush should at least be subject to an independent, thorough and powerful investigation.
Bush is a liability and a threat to the security of the world (including Americans).
Originally posted by STANGKnow what, Stang? You're a boring, pitiful prick, just pitiful. Months ago I sort of admired your misplaced fervor. But that was months ago. Now I just think you're a shallow, boring, pitiful prick.
Looters aim to satisfy their own interests (possibly including their families and friends).
Bush had personal financial interests in Iraq - both oil and military equipment.
Looters take advantage of other people's defenses being down while they suffer.
Bush used Saddam as a smoke screen to access Iraqi oil
Looters hurt other people.
Bush i ...[text shortened]... gation.
Bush is a liability and a threat to the security of the world (including Americans).
Originally posted by DelmerYou can think what you like but it's wrong to say I'm a prick
Know what, Stang? You're a boring, pitiful prick, just pitiful. Months ago I sort of admired your misplaced fervor. But that was months ago. Now I just think you're a shallow, boring, pitiful prick.
Originally posted by STANGExcuse me, but are you Stang the only person who can see StarValleyWy? You quote his posts from thread to thread but the original posts all vanish. Have you possessed him?
Originally posted by StarValleyWy
[b]You are pushing it STANG
I guess I might be. However, you've got a reputation too StarValleyWy.[/b]
1 edit
Originally posted by sasquatch672Your "actively lobbying" all over the forums for STANG's permanent ban makes you a boring, pitiful, ignorant, fascist prick. Your post makes it absolutely clear that you are seeking his banning because he presents ideas that you find offensive. Get over it; people respond to his threads and no one ever said originality was a requirement in the forums of an internet chess site. If you don't like his threads, don't post in ones that say STANG started it.
Looks like you alerted another one of my posts, Stan. So, I'll repeat myself. You are a boring, pitiful, ignorant, terrorist-sympathizing prick. And I will actively lobby for your permanent ban.
1 edit
Originally posted by sasquatch672Really?? Did you actively campaign for SVW's ban?? He took over the forums on his "rant" nights far more than STANG ever does. Scipio77777777 was another one who did the same thing. Maybe I missed your unending campaigns to get those users permanently banned,
Nope. It actually has nothing to do with his ideas. He's a right to his opinions, as offensive as they may be. As do you. I just can't stand how he hijacks the forums. He does it constantly. That's why I want him banned. I would actively campaign for the ban of somebody who agreed with everything I said if they took over the forums the way tha ...[text shortened]... sy to give us a little variety every once in a while. But no. So off he goes, if I get my way.
Originally posted by sasquatch672It's an internet forum, Sasquatch, you can't expect everyone to be as brilliant and articulate as I am. STANG's a one-trick pony, but zeeblebot's posted a link to the same article from the Project for a New American century about 50 times without ever actually discussing any of it. I ignore it; you would do well to simply ignore STANG when he gets in his parrot mode. Permanent bannings are not nice things to do just becaus someone is presenting their idea (SINGULAR) in a monotonous way.
Yeah, SVW would definitely do that. You're right. And no, I did not, but I do recall flame wars with him. We smoked a peace pipe. And Scipio - I don't think he has a frontal lobe. It's just gone, probably eaten away from sniffing turpentine or glue. I don't recall a time where he took over the forums like Stang. Sure, SVW would post in like t ...[text shortened]... y-five different threads, but he varied what the hell he would talk about. Not like this moron.