Go back
Bush is also a looter

Bush is also a looter

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
I understand that this is the internet. But Zeeble's post, while you may see it as equivalent to Stang's dickhead behavior (how ironic would it be if I was the one that got banned), does not rise to anywhere near the level of ubiquity of Stang's mindless droning. (I didn't think you ignored anybody.) But there are worse things that can happen to s ...[text shortened]... ve to get off his ass and actually do something about a real problem that he has influence over.
Somehow I doubt very seriously that you have STANG's best interests at heart. There are worse things that can happen than someone reading posts that they regard as "mindless dronings", particulary when no gun is placed to their head to require them to. STANG doesn't want to get banned, he's a paying customer and there's no compelling reason to ban him. If you want to disagree with his opinions fine, post in opposition. But a campaign to ban a fellow member of the community for nothing more than posting in an unoffensive manner that you don't personally care for is petty.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
Call me Richard then.
I'll use the shorter derivation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
You can think what you like but it's wrong to say I'm a prick
You're right, it is wrong to say you're a prick. That denigrates the penis.

And by the way Stang, denigrate means... to disparage; belittle.

And I'm not even a Bush backer.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Your "actively lobbying" all over the forums for STANG's permanent ban makes you a boring, pitiful, ignorant, fascist prick. Your post makes it absolutely clear that you are seeking his banning because he presents ideas that you find offensive. Get over it; people respond to his threads and no one ever said originality was a requirement in the forums ...[text shortened]... ernet chess site. If you don't like his threads, don't post in ones that say STANG started it.
We're talking about maybe 5 threads that I post to. I don't go posting over all the threads. He has a problem seeing my name against a thread and simply skipping it or he has a problem with the message. I suspect it is the latter. And he would have me banned for my message. That's censorship. It also misses the fact that my recs have rocketed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

What is annoying is all the times you copy and paste the same groceries list of vague statements over and over again. Also the new threads you make with nothing written in the first post. I agree with half your politics, but your methods piss me off.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow
What is annoying is all the times you copy and paste the same groceries list of vague statements over and over again. Also the new threads you make with nothing written in the first post. I agree with half your politics, but your methods piss me off.
The worst thing about a situation is your own reaction to it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

You could argue that going to a restraunt and spitting in the waiters face isn't rude, the only problem is his reaction to it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow
You could argue that going to a restraunt and spitting in the waiters face isn't rude, the only problem is his reaction to it.
What if he had an easy choice not to be there - like maybe he saw me in that restaraunt and just skipped to work in the restaraunt next door ?