24d
@AverageJoe1 saidAlways the victim.
Infuriating? Seriously, should I not be infuriated at Biden 'compelliing' (Moonbus' word) me and you to pay off the school tuiition of grad students?
Why do you get to be infuriated but I do not. It is not faaaaaaaaaaaaiir.
Nope.
23d
@AverageJoe1 saidI would rather that whoever gets into the WH lead by inspiring bi-partisan support, instead of whining that he’s the victim of a witch hunt (he himself inflamed by his outrageous behavior).
Would you rather he be like a baby in diapers as is Biden? Just asking.
23d
@AverageJoe1 said65% ?? You’re making that up. Fake statistics.
Why do College educated people get free money, when 65% of our Non-college educated get O money.?
None of you turkeys have ever responded directly to and answered this question.
The issue is the government giving out free money, NOT people being educated. If you and Suzianne (the ‘her one) had 3 kids and gave $1000 to one of them (33.% of them) for a reason you ...[text shortened]... w would you explain that?
Are you going to let me win yet another debate about a single issue?
So if a family had three kids and 1,000 $ disposable cash, you think each kid should get one third. Is that your idea how government should work too? Give everyone equal shares? You and Karl Marx make strange bedfellows.
23d
1 edit
Marxism? Let’s call it that for sake of argument, and discuss it.
But could you first recognize this ‘single issue’ and not deflect as libs are wont to do.
So, if Momma Suzianne comes home from work with $1000, how can she justify giving it all to one of her 3 children, and nothing to the other 2 children?
Single issue, relating same to Daddy Biden coming from office and giving $1000 to one third of his children (citizens) and none to the other two-thirds?
You can do this, moon. An exercise in single issue. Much more efficient than Sonhouse Method, mentioning several concepts, phrases, pet peeves , etc
23d
@moonbus saidLet me get this straight....you deny that you are committing and carrying out a witch hunt,,,,,,that, you have been doing it for 8 years? No crime has been elucidated. The ladies of yore, whom we know now were NOT witches, were persecuted. Donald is not being persecuted? 3 weeks in court with no specific crime?
I would rather that whoever gets into the WH lead by inspiring bi-partisan support, instead of whining that he’s the victim of a witch hunt (he himself inflamed by his outrageous behavior).
All of you seem very weak in your plethora of posts. Nothing concrete. Pitiful. You hate him, and that is it.
23d
@moonbus saidMoon....................................
65% ?? You’re making that up. Fake statistics.
So if a family had three kids and 1,000 $ disposable cash, you think each kid should get one third. Is that your idea how government should work too? Give everyone equal shares? You and Karl Marx make strange bedfellows.
Could you not have looked this up yourself. Pitiful. Hey, conservatives, who in the hell are we debating with? A child, a sloth, a marxist, a foreign socialist, a nut, several clueless somebodies, dependents, the list goes on.
This particular one, Moon-something takes exception to my informative percentage of US Citizens without college degrees. So, I had to stop my great morning and look it up for him.
"Just to add a little more relevant data: Some 62 percent of Americans over the age of 25 do not have a college degree. Among younger workers, as of 2021, the salary gap between those who went to college and those who stopped at 12th grade was $22,000 a year.":
Whew. Why me Lord
23d
@AverageJoe1 saidCalm down snowflake.
Moon....................................
Could you not have looked this up yourself. Pitiful. Hey, conservatives, who in the hell are we debating with? A child, a sloth, a marxist, a foreign socialist, a nut, several clueless somebodies, dependents, the list goes on.
This particular one, Moon-something takes exception to my informative percentage of US Citi ...[text shortened]... who went to college and those who stopped at 12th grade was $22,000 a year.":
Whew. Why me Lord
23d
@AverageJoe1 saidExactly why we need to let citizens go to 4 year university for no cost to them.
Moon....................................
Could you not have looked this up yourself. Pitiful. Hey, conservatives, who in the hell are we debating with? A child, a sloth, a marxist, a foreign socialist, a nut, several clueless somebodies, dependents, the list goes on.
This particular one, Moon-something takes exception to my informative percentage of US Citi ...[text shortened]... who went to college and those who stopped at 12th grade was $22,000 a year.":
Whew. Why me Lord
Having an uninformed electorate is destroying this country.
23d
@Suzianne saidI have bested moonbus and wildgrass on this ojne, witness their not-responses, just silly gibberrish.
Exactly why we need to let citizens go to 4 year university for no cost to them.
Having an uninformed electorate is destroying this country.
Then here comes Suzianne with a proper response, seems older than her years. If I may paraphrase, she is saying that it is her opinion that the parents should split all of the $1000 between all the children. In effect, that Biden should split this new-found $600B between all of the citizens, for use to pay down their debts.....I think it comes out to about $2,000 per citizen. If he is into giving money away, I agree with Suzianne that this is the way it should be done.
Y'all could learn from Suzianne. Correct me if I am wrong, Suzianne?
22d
@AverageJoe1 saidDon't "paraphrase" me. You always get it wrong.
I have bested moonbus and wildgrass on this ojne, witness their not-responses, just silly gibberrish.
Then here comes Suzianne with a proper response, seems older than her years. If I may paraphrase, she is saying that it is her opinion that the parents should split all of the $1000 between all the children. In effect, that Biden should split this new-found $600B b ...[text shortened]... e way it should be done.
Y'all could learn from Suzianne. Correct me if I am wrong, Suzianne?
21d
@Suzianne saidCan you not respond to your hypocrisy, are you just going to concede the thread to me?
Don't "paraphrase" me. You always get it wrong.
OK for Biden to pick certain categories to give money to, but would it be a good idea for a parent to give a large sum of money to one child for no special reason, ignoring the other children?
Be interesting, old sport.
21d
@AverageJoe1 saidYou first.
Can you not respond to your hypocrisy, are you just going to concede the thread to me?
OK for Biden to pick certain categories to give money to, but would it be a good idea for a parent to give a large sum of money to one child for no special reason, ignoring the other children?
Be interesting, old sport.