@averagejoe1 saidYou pretend it's radical but amendments are part of the constitution. They happen. 27 times already, including the bear arms one.
A certain poster has said the Constitution needs to be tweeted, updated. Does anyone here care to tell us what should be changed from the way it already is, or subtracted from, or added to?
The radical idea is to tear up the current one and write a new one.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@wildgrass saidFirearms are not, muzzle loading, single actions anymore.
You pretend it's radical but amendments are part of the constitution. They happen. 27 times already, including the bear arms one.
The radical idea is to tear up the current one and write a new one.
These are top-of-the-
line semi-automatic weapons that
our founding fathers could,'t have envisioned.'
\REVISIT THE SECOND AMENDMENT
@Earl-of-Trumps
Abolish? We just want to make it very difficult for average citizens to get military weapons, what a ridiculous agenda, eh.
Oh I forgot, the answer is to have every teacher have an AR15 at her side so she can teach the children just how we are supposed to live, that is, in FEAR always.
@sonhouse saidThe AR15 is NOT a military weapon.
@Earl-of-Trumps
Abolish? We just want to make it very difficult for average citizens to get military weapons, what a ridiculous agenda, eh.
Oh I forgot, the answer is to have every teacher have an AR15 at her side so she can teach the children just how we are supposed to live, that is, in FEAR always.
@metal-brain saidIt’s a prototype for a military weapon. Sort of like how the YF23 is not a military aircraft.
The AR15 is NOT a military weapon.
@sonhouse saidYes, repeal it. That was the suggestion by the SJC. Then the states can do what they want
@Earl-of-Trumps
Abolish? We just want to make it very difficult for average citizens to get military weapons, what a ridiculous agenda, eh.
Oh I forgot, the answer is to have every teacher have an AR15 at her side so she can teach the children just how we are supposed to live, that is, in FEAR always.
2 edits
@sonhouse saidAre you saying Montana and Idaho shouldn't count? And once again you show your totalitarian tendencies.
@Earl-of-Trumps
Yeah, I'm SURE Montana and Idaho would IMMEDIATELY ban guns.
Thank god the constitution is there to protect us all from the "me me" people.
PS: to add, you need 3/4 states = 38, so you don't need those two anyway
@earl-of-trumps saidLibs will always be totally against states making any decisions about anything. Has to be only one ruling entity. That is what they would put in the Constitution on day 1. You know, day one, like the day of the presidency when Biden made us dependent on gas. Don't forgeeeeeeeettt.
Yes, repeal it. That was the suggestion by the SJC. Then the states can do what they want
@athousandyoung saidjust an ignorant lie...the ar15 is not, and has never been used by the us military
It’s a prototype for a military weapon. Sort of like how the YF23 is not a military aircraft.
@mott-the-hoople saidNeither has the YF23
just an ignorant lie...the ar15 is not, and has never been used by the us military