1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidYou have NO idea what you are talking about fool. You're nothing but a worthless to God MAGA freak liar; end of story lying loser. There's no point even discussing scriptures with liar MAGA freaks as yourself, as all you liar freaks do is lie; just as your father Satan; Period. Good day liar loser. 🙂
just trying to save your soul friend
its not too late, Jesus gave his blood so you could repent and find salvation
@Mott-The-Hoople saida god that would do to the world what is described in revelations is evil and not worthy of worship.
You dont understand what “fulfill” means.
Here is when Gods laws will be fulfilled.
Rev. 21
“ 21 Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,”[a] for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. 2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her h ...[text shortened]... all liars—they will be consigned to the fiery lake of burning sulfur. [/b]This is the second death.”
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI attribute the achievement of a marginally lower test score on a standardized test when the person taking it has been subject to massively negative external conditions as "talent" and/or "drive" or whatever positive characteristic you want to call it.
you attribute a LOWER test score to talent
there is your error
That is no error.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidDo you know what "soon" means?
You dont understand what “fulfill” means.
Here is when Gods laws will be fulfilled.
Rev. 21
“ 21 Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,”[a] for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. 2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her h ...[text shortened]... all liars—they will be consigned to the fiery lake of burning sulfur. [/b]This is the second death.”
https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/preterist-approach-revelation-unfolding-biblical-eschatology
The book opens and closes with declarations indicating that the things revealed in the book “must soon take place” (Rev. 1:1; Rev. 22:6). It opens and closes with declarations indicating that “the time is near” (Rev. 1:3; Rev. 22:10). The book of Revelation does not begin in the way the pseudepigraphal Book of Enoch begins, with a statement to the effect that the content is not for the present generation, but for a remote generation that is still to come. The book of Revelation has direct relevance to the real historical first century churches to whom it was addressed, and the text of the book itself points to the imminent fulfillment of most of its prophecies.
2 edits
https://themysteryofchrist.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/the-true-beauty-of-revelation/
It is interesting to note the following phrases from the book of Revelations that imply immediacy and imminence, evoking a sense of urgency and expectancy of things to happen within the lifetime of the writer and his audience:
“things which must shortly take place” (Revelations 1:1)
“for the time is near” (Revelation 1:3)
“I will come to you quickly” (Revelation 2:5)
“Behold, I am coming quickly” (Revelation 3:11)
“he knows that he has a short time” (Revelation 12:12)
“show His servants the things which must shortly take place” (Revelation 22:6)
“Do not seal the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is at hand” (Revelation 22:10)
“Surely I am coming quickly” (Revelation 22:20)
So, what do the phrases “shortly”, “time is near”, “quickly” and “at hand” mean in the context of the writing of the book of Revelation? Does it mean 2,000 years later after the writer John had died long ago? Or does it mean those things would happen within his lifetime in the first century AD? Let’s apply some intellectual honesty here, shall we?
2 edits
@AThousandYoung saidCan you not speak for yourself?
Do you know what "soon" means?https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/preterist-approach-revelation-unfolding-biblical-eschatology
The book opens and closes with declarations indicating that the things revealed in the book “must soon take place” (Rev. 1:1; Rev. 22:6). It opens and closes with declarations indicating that “the time is near” (Rev. 1:3; Rev. 22: ...[text shortened]... nd the text of the book itself points to the imminent fulfillment of most of its prophecies.
Why do you link to another’s thoughts?
And your “soon”comment…the Bible does not list any times so I fail to see why you say it, unless of course you are just repeating what you googled
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI use links as a way to compensate for Brandolini’s Law and because in a debate you’re supposed to reference others thoughts.
Can you not speak for yourself?
Why do you link to another’s thoughts?
And your “soon”comment…the Bible does not list any times so I fail to see why you say it, unless of course you are just repeating what you googled
BTW Revelation isn’t your thoughts why do you reference it?
https://ncfca.org/wp-content/uploads/Debate-Evidence-Citation-Samples.pdf
Evidence is a critical part of both Lincoln-Douglas Value and Team Policy Debate. Because debate rounds take place within a fixed time frame with no immediate access to verify the information presented, it is imperative that competitors exhibit the highest degree of academic integrity by citing essential source
information verbally, by reading quotations verbatim, by differentiating the words of the author from the rhetoric of the speaker, and by having evidence with full citations readily available for inspection by the opposing team or
judge(s).
1 edit
@AThousandYoung saidYou can reference their thoughts, thats not what you did. Your entire post except “do you understand soon” was a quote of someone else, not you.
I use links as a way to compensate for Brandolini’s Law and because in a debate you’re supposed to reference others thoughts.
BTW Revelation isn’t your thoughts why do you reference it?
@AThousandYoung saidThe book of rev is facts, not thoughts
I use links as a way to compensate for Brandolini’s Law and because in a debate you’re supposed to reference others thoughts.
BTW Revelation isn’t your thoughts why do you reference it?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidSo says Doctor Spin.
So you side with discriminating against the white kid because of black culture?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidAnd what commandments do you think he was talking about?
““Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.
For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.
Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom ...[text shortened]... oes and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
— Matthew 5:17–19 (NKJV)”
Hint: it wasn't the commandments Moses brought down from the mountain.
@KingDavid403 saidModern-day Pharisees.
It's funny though, I agree it's weird when christian folks like charlie use the Bible to say they hate gay people when Christ doesn't say one way or another.
Yes, it's disgusting. They had a Christian anti-gay march through my current trumptarded city about 20 years ago. Marching down the street chanting " God hates faqs" over and over. Disgusting and comple ...[text shortened]... Christ and his teachings of hate; just as the Pharisees in Jesus days here on earth. Same as today.
Indeed.
@wildgrass saidHere's some more of his supposed Christian beliefs. He WAS a liar and a worthless pos; and he certainly WAS not a true Christian; period.
There is a segment in one of Kirks podcasts where he says we can fix our societal problems if we have kids as young as 12 be witnesses to public executions.