Snippet taken from
http://dahrjamailiraq.com/weblog/archives/dispatches/000365.php#more
"Well said Mr. Blair, particularly when we keep in mind the fact that less than a year ago in Basra, two undercover British SAS soldiers were detained by Iraqi security forces whilst traveling in a car full of bombs and remote detonators.
Jailed and accused by Muqtada al-Sadr and others of attempting to generate sectarian conflict by planting bombs in mosques, they were broken out of the Iraqi jail by the British military before they could be tried"
Has anyone any more information on this allegation of the SAS being caught by Iraqi forces with explosives or was there an explaination given by the UK government?
Is just makes me wonder do the coalition countries have anything to gain by promoting unrest and "sectarian conflict" within Iraq, as this article suggests.
Worth a debate at least..
"They were disguised by wigs and Arab dress. Iraqi sources reported that the Iraqi police were watching the two, and when they tried to approach them they shot two policemen and tried to escape the scene."
and
"Yet many other Americans and Britons – troops as well as independent reporters – speak loudly about the African, Latin American, American and British mercenaries operating in Iraq and are paid thousands more than the regular troops to perpetrate the terror attacks"
Taken from
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=AKL20050930&articleId=1024
Obviously, could be just propeganda but its interesting to ask why these two SAS agents had to fire upon the Iraqi security forces when it looked like they were being caught..
Originally posted by dk3nnyyou are probably on to something here but i would like to see you prove it!
Snippet taken from
http://dahrjamailiraq.com/weblog/archives/dispatches/000365.php#more
"Well said Mr. Blair, particularly when we keep in mind the fact that less than a year ago in Basra, two undercover British SAS soldiers were detained by Iraqi security forces whilst traveling in a car full of bombs and remote detonators.
Jailed and accused by Muqta ...[text shortened]... and "sectarian conflict" within Iraq, as this article suggests.
Worth a debate at least..
Originally posted by invigorateI was hoping someone else would try that for me 🙂
you are probably on to something here but i would like to see you prove it!
Well, the second link i posted is a fairly dodgy source, sounds more like Arab propganda that anything else.
However, as with a lot of conspiricy theories there's often a grain of truth burried deep within the story, its just a case of seperating it from the chaff.
Originally posted by dk3nnyAnd now the politicians enter the game...
Snippet taken from
http://dahrjamailiraq.com/weblog/archives/dispatches/000365.php#more
"Well said Mr. Blair, particularly when we keep in mind the fact that less than a year ago in Basra, two undercover British SAS soldiers were detained by Iraqi security forces whilst traveling in a car full of bombs and remote detonators.
Jailed and accused by Muqta ...[text shortened]... and "sectarian conflict" within Iraq, as this article suggests.
Worth a debate at least..
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4747316.stm
It all fits in with the conspiracy theory, IMO.
D
Let's not forget that Iran and Al Qaida are interested in making things as difficult as possible in order to prevent the establishment of a viable democracy in Iraq. In fact they are willing to try everything to prevent this from happening. Maybe they will succeed.
A day after the attack on the Golden Mosque, Iran accused Israel, the US and the UK of having carried out this attack. Now evidence is pointing in the direction of the Iranian regime as being the perpetrators, which seems a lot more likely.
Iran is following the same strategy in Iraq as the Syrian regime is following in Lebanon: Cause a lot of chaos and blame the ennemy for it.