"President Trump asks us to hold that Section Three disqualifies every oath-breaking insurrectionist except the most powerful one and that it bars oath-breakers from virtually every office, both state and federal, except the highest one in the land.
Both results are inconsistent with the plain language and history of Section Three." (Italics in original) https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf at P.87
@no1marauder said😂
"President Trump asks us to hold that Section Three disqualifies every oath-breaking insurrectionist except the most powerful one and that it bars oath-breakers from virtually every office, both state and federal, except the highest one in the land.
Both results are inconsistent with the plain language and history of Section Three." (Italics in original) h ...[text shortened]... .courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf at P.87
how many times you gonna make an ass of yourself?
"The district court concluded that President Trump exhibited the requisite
intent here. It found that, before the January 6 rally, “[President] Trump knew that
his supporters were angry and prepared to use violence to ‘stop the steal’
including physically preventing Vice President Pence from certifying the
election,” Anderson, ¶ 128, and that President Trump’s response to the events
following his speech “support . . . that [President] Trump endorsed and intended
the actions of the mob on January 6,” id. at ¶ 193 (second alteration in original).
Based on these findings of fact, the court “conclude[d] that [President] Trump
acted with the specific intent to incite political violence and direct it at the Capitol
with the purpose of disrupting the electoral certification.” Id. at ¶ 293.
¶247 The district court found that President Trump knew, before he gave his
speech, that there was the potential for violence on January 6. It found that
“[President] Trump himself agrees that his supporters ‘listen to [him] like no one
else,’” id. at ¶ 63 (second alteration in original), and that federal agencies that
President Trump oversaw identified threats of violence ahead of January 6,
including “threats to storm the U.S. Capitol and kill elected officials,” id. at ¶¶ 123–24.
at P. 129
@no1marauder said😂 any day now. 😂. you pitiful fool
"The district court concluded that President Trump exhibited the requisite
intent here. It found that, before the January 6 rally, “[President] Trump knew that
his supporters were angry and prepared to use violence to ‘stop the steal’
including physically preventing Vice President Pence from certifying the
election,” Anderson, ¶ 128, and that President Trump’s res ...[text shortened]... uding “threats to storm the U.S. Capitol and kill elected officials,” id. at ¶¶ 123–24.
at P. 129
@mott-the-hoople saidWell on this day the Colorado Supreme Court kicked Trump off the ballot effective January 4, 2024 unless the SCOTUS intervenes by then.
😂 any day now. 😂. you pitiful fool
@mott-the-hoople saidRead the news once in a while.
😂
how many times you gonna make an ass of yourself?
No, the real news.
@vivify saidThe case is limited to his appearing on the ballot for the Republican primary in Colorado; plaintiffs are asking the Secretary of State in Colorado to not place him on that ballot.
If Trump wins the primary would he still be off the state ballot next November? Or will that require a different hearing?
Assuming the decision stands but Trump wins the Republican nomination anyway, I would assume it would be binding precedent for the general election in Colorado.
@mott-the-hoople saidWhat the fukk is wrong with you, you bloody retard?
😂 any day now. 😂. you pitiful fool
Are you suggesting trump wasn’t just booted from the primary ballot in Colarado?
Or do you just not comprehend? In that case, I appologise for not taking your inbreeding into account.
@no1marauder saidA bunch of meanderers strolling about taking selfies and a lectern were not going to physically prevent Pence from doing anything. Who, if he felt the least tinniest bit threatened could go to some bunker or other building and carry on about his buraeuRat state worshipping religious mumbo jumbo rituals.
"The district court concluded that President Trump exhibited the requisite
intent here. It found that, before the January 6 rally, “[President] Trump knew that
his supporters were angry and prepared to use violence to ‘stop the steal’
including physically preventing Vice President Pence from certifying the
election,” Anderson, ¶ 128, and that President Trump’s res ...[text shortened]... uding “threats to storm the U.S. Capitol and kill elected officials,” id. at ¶¶ 123–24.
at P. 129
@wajoma saidA lie doesn't become true because of repetition.
A bunch of meanderers strolling about taking selfies and a lectern were not going to physically prevent Pence from doing anything.
If I am invited to your home and break the window to gain access, beat up your family, you would say the same?
@mott-the-hoople saidThe person mkaing an ass from themselves seems to be you.
😂
how many times you gonna make an ass of yourself?
Even if the Supreme Court of the United States does intervene, which is by no means sure, for the time being the ruling is what te ruling is. So Marauder is certainly not the one of you two making an ass of himself.
@ponderable said.1 percent of the Jan 6er's, and those were likely double agent provocateur's .
A lie doesn't become true because of repetition.
If I am invited to your home and break the window to gain access, beat up your family, you would say the same?
Do you want to play with your ridiculous analogy? Which amounts to blaming innocent people for the actions of a few. You're the one repeating the lie, and it will not become truth no matter how many times you repeat it. Do you really think they knew where Pence was, what he was going to do, what they'd need to do to prevent him doing it, and all this is based on none of the Capitol officials seeing what was happening and allowing Pence to carry on as if it weren't rather than going to another location and playing out the silly ritual.
All you've got to do to see the BS is try to play out the scenario, and it becomes more and more ridiculous the deeper you go, which is something that happens with lies, tell one you need another five to cover it, then another five... etc etc something like your analogies.