Go back
Conservatives: Will you now condemn Fox?

Conservatives: Will you now condemn Fox?

Debates


@averagejoe1 said
What did he say? I play golf, et al, and do not absorb the stuff you boys do. So, tell me what he said, in the form of 'proven they knew lies.....etc". What sentence did he utter? Was it a text? In court? An interview?
I already posted it.


@vivify

FOX is bad, yes. Others are worse, so why would I say not to watch FOX?

Don't watch anything, then.


@Earl-of-Trumps
So for you it is FINE that Fox news KNOWINGLY lies just to keep up its ratings.
Tell me of any other network that does that KNOWINGLY and as POLICY?


@vivify said
Since it has been proven in a court of law under oath and with uncovered text messages that Fox News knowingly spreads lies, will you here and now state that Fox is a piece of trash that no one should watch?

"Yeah but what about this liberal news source—"

Don't deflect. Will you condemn Fox News now that there is unequivocal proof they are liars?
Will you condemn the lies of Rachel Maddow?

Every corporate news media outlet lies. Did you think you stumbled onto something new and groundbreaking here? CNN lied by saying Joe Rogan took horse paste when his doctor prescribed it to him. I could go on and on all day.


The bottom line: no reasonable person would have believed Tucker Carlson's 'terminological inexactitudes' or whatever else his lawyers are calling lies these days. So, who believed it, huh? And who still believes it?

I think a minimum age isn't enough. People should be required to pass a cognitive competency test before being allowed to vote, make babies, pilot motor vehicles, consume alcohol, run for or hold public office, become a law enforcement officer, or possess firearms.


@moonbus
You are underestimating the stupidity of Magites.

2 edits

@wildgrass said
Lol. You asked for the words from a judge. Read the legal documents. It's only confusion from your end.
It’s not a confusion it’s a modus operandi, he asks a question and begs the libs to answer it. The libs answer the question multiple times and Joe proceeds to pretend they haven’t answered the question.
it’s a low intelligence wind up troll that lies through its teeth about what other users post.
It should be ignored or alerted for misrepresentation.

2 edits

@kevcvs57 said
It’s not a confusion it’s a modus operandi, he asks a question and begs the libs to answer it. The libs answer the question multiple times and Joe proceeds to pretend they haven’t answered the question.
it’s a low intelligence wind up troll that lies through its teeth about what other users post.
It should be ignored or alerted for misrepresentation.
Then you be the guy to highlight where it was answered, page x, 3rd post from top?

alllleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrted. Y'all sure talk funny. If a person even thinks about telling an authority (a moderator, or, more to the point, a mommy.) that another person did something, their mindset is 'I'm Gonna Tell!!" Conservatives are not likely to do that, much less even suggest it, as you have.
Schoolyard city. Y'all are really a trip, entertaining, which is why I do this.

1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Then you be the guy to highlight where it was answered, page x, 3rd post from top?

alllleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrted. Y'all sure talk funny.
Hey lying low intelligence troll you were sent a direct quote from the actual case against fox in regard to its lies in order to keep its viewing figures up and the trump base happy.
I suggest you go back and look at the reply from wildgrass
You question was actually fourth from the top on page 1 which I guess we’re calling page x now for some inexplicable reason πŸ™„


@kevcvs57 said
Hey lying low intelligence troll you were sent a direct quote from the actual case against fox in regard to its lies in order to keep its viewing figures up and the trump base happy.
I suggest you go back and look at the reply from wildgrass
You question was actually fourth from the top on page 1 which I guess we’re calling page x now for some inexplicable reason πŸ™„
I just read WGrass after my question . Please read my question, to get what it questions, and then please answer it. If you do 'a' link (I see no reason for more than 1 link, as it Is one simple question,) it should include what authority or court stated their findings.


Every single conserve deflected from Fox News' lies by pivoting toward a more liberal news outlet. Predictable.


@vivify said
Every single conserve deflected from Fox News' lies by pivoting toward a more liberal news outlet. Predictable.
You talking' to me?
Say wha'?

1 edit

@kevcvs57 said
Hey lying low intelligence troll you were sent a direct quote from the actual case against fox in regard to its lies in order to keep its viewing figures up and the trump base happy.
....Sent a direct quote.....You see, here is the problem. You reply with what you call an answer, but it is some news clip, whatever, that sort of runs a gamut of some sort, when all I have asked for is what court or authority ruled against FOX, so I can look up the exact 'known lies', the quote that we are looking for, which would have had to be in the court findings.
Or you could save me the trouble, and, uhhh, just Tell me?


"Alert'!
πŸ€”

Kev has seen that there has been no direct answer, which would be about only 10 words, and so is going to now send it to us so we will all be talking about the same thing. I don't think we could possibly all pick the same issue-sentence out of all those linked paragraphs .


@vivify said
Trump admitted to lying about the severity of Covid, saying he knew it would be "five times" more deadly than the flu.

That "fearmongering" from CNN was apparently just telling the truth. Much more "damage" was spread from conserve lies about it.

"Yeah but what about this liberal news source—"

Don't deflect.

Right on cue.
===That "fearmongering" from CNN was apparently just telling the truth. Much more "damage" was spread from conserve lies about it.===


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Thanks. I needed a good belly laugh this morning.