Conservatives: Will you now condemn Fox?

@moonbus said
The bottom line: no reasonable person would have believed Tucker Carlson's 'terminological inexactitudes' or whatever else his lawyers are calling lies these days. So, who believed it, huh? And who still believes it?

I think a minimum age isn't enough. People should be required to pass a cognitive competency test before being allowed to vote, make babies, pilot moto ...[text shortened]... nsume alcohol, run for or hold public office, become a law enforcement officer, or possess firearms.

Ha, Trump would pass, read what you wrote . Would Biden?

@kevcvs57 said
Hey lying low intelligence troll you were sent a direct quote from the actual case against fox in regard to its lies in order to keep its viewing figures up and the trump base happy.
I suggest you go back and look at the reply from wildgrass
You question was actually fourth from the top on page 1 which I guess we’re calling page x now for some inexplicable reason 🙄

To everyone. Some people here say that it is 'proven' about the lies,,,,,,,and I asked by whom, and what did they say. I was covered with random links .
I defy anyone to look back and find a straight answer. But bless the libs, they lack that characteristic. They just yap and post.
You might think that they would simply respond, two sentences, to this post, to clear the air, and, more importantly to prove their creds. Naaa, it aint in them, word games are more important.

@averagejoe1 said
I defy anyone to look back and find a straight answer. But bless the libs, they lack that characteristic. They just yap and post.

I posted the straightest answer I possibly could. Let's lay out the timeline.

1) Someone sues FoxNews for defamation of character.
2) FoxNews files a court motion to dismiss the charges.
3) Judge agrees with FoxNews, and dismisses the charges because FoxNews lawyers persuasively argued that Carlson is "not stating facts". Their viewers could not possibly think that Carlson was telling the truth, so it cannot be defamation.
4) FoxNews viewers try to tie themselves in knots to either ignore the obvious (FoxNews lies to viewers) or to spin that news back to other news organizations.

I quoted the judge. I explained the rationale. I even gave a completely different example just in case you thought that particular one was an isolated incident. This has happened many times.

FoxNews business model depends on you purposefully pretending to ignore the fact that they repeatedly lie on air and willingly admit it.

@averagejoe1 said
To everyone. Some people here say that it is 'proven' about the lies,,,,,,,and I asked by whom, and what did they say. I was covered with random links .
I defy anyone to look back and find a straight answer. But bless the libs, they lack that characteristic. They just yap and post.
You might think that they would simply respond, two sentences, to this post, ...[text shortened]... and, more importantly to prove their creds. Naaa, it aint in them, word games are more important.

You’re in denial and deeply ashamed to admit you fell for the fox news and trump lies.

There was no voter fraud on any meaningful scale, fox news knew this, but peddled the lies anyway. And you can’t handle being suckered.

So, like tucker himself, you now stick to the lie, double down in public, but I bet you’re rather nervous at home, eh.
My God, how could you be so stupid?
I know you’re thinking it.

But don’t worry, most of their other lies might still be true.

@shavixmir said
You’re in denial and deeply ashamed to admit you fell for the fox news and trump lies.

There was no voter fraud on any meaningful scale, fox news knew this, but peddled the lies anyway. And you can’t handle being suckered.

So, like tucker himself, you now stick to the lie, double down in public, but I bet you’re rather nervous at home, eh.
My God, how could you be so ...[text shortened]... tupid?
I know you’re thinking it.

But don’t worry, most of their other lies might still be true.

To Wildgrass and Shav. Why don't you write about the fishing in China? Cause you ain't never answered my question. What lies?
And, what 'other' lies did these entertainers tell?

@averagejoe1 said
To Wildgrass and Shav. Why don't you write about the fishing in China? Cause you ain't never answered my question. What lies?
And, what 'other' lies did these entertainers tell?

🙄

@wildgrass said
I posted the straightest answer I possibly could. Let's lay out the timeline.

1) Someone sues FoxNews for defamation of character.
2) FoxNews files a court motion to dismiss the charges.
3) Judge agrees with FoxNews, and dismisses the charges because FoxNews lawyers persuasively argued that Carlson is "not stating facts". Their viewers could not possibly think that Car ...[text shortened]... u purposefully pretending to ignore the fact that they repeatedly lie on air and willingly admit it.

This is neither here nor there, but does Sonhouse 'state facts'?
Any way, I asked for the lie to be quoted here on the Forum. The only time you use the word 'lie' in your response above is when you say 'FOX news lies to viewers' . You tell me squat. Your post is useless.
I just hate it. I think we have about wrapped this unanswered question up, I will put it under my Christmas tree!

@shavixmir said


There was no voter fraud on any meaningful scale,

oops, almost overlooked this , Shav. After all this, you dare use the phrase 'meaningful scale'?????? Does this suggest,,,,,,well, maybe there was a little bit!!!!!!!!!!!???? You double-talkn' AvJoe? You can't kid a kidder, Shav. That sentence only serves to negate your response(s), thus the responses of all of y'all.