@mott-the-hoople saidWhy do you say "won't work" when usually what you're bitching about is subsidies for those who can't work?
to paraphrase, Jesus said a man that wont work shouldnt eat, isnt worth the salt in his bread
Not exactly love for your brother there, man.
@suzianne saidI said “wont work” because its what i meant.
Why do you say "won't work" when usually what you're bitching about is subsidies for those who can't work?
Not exactly love for your brother there, man.
You speak for you, I will speak for me.
a little marerider syndrome going on there
havent you got some spell checking you need to be doing?
@moonbus
If you think THAT is bad, look at Idaho passing a law making a girl a criminal if she as an Idaho citizen dares to cross state lines to ANY other state allowing abortion, she is now a criminal if she goes back to Idaho.
Pretty inhuman to me.
Besides going directly against the constitution, I think amendment 14 if I am not mistaken:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-14/section-1/interstate-travel
@sonhouse saidIs taking an innocent human life ever okay? Is it okay if they are 100 years old, 50, 25, 5, 2, 1, or even in the womb as they are STILL HUMAN lives?
@moonbus
If you think THAT is bad, look at Idaho passing a law making a girl a criminal if she as an Idaho citizen dares to cross state lines to ANY other state allowing abortion, she is now a criminal if she goes back to Idaho.
Pretty inhuman to me.
Besides going directly against the constitution, I think amendment 14 if I am not mistaken:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-14/section-1/interstate-travel
@sonhouse saidI should think prohibiting people from crossing state lines is unconstitutional and that such laws will be challenged and struck down. Freedom of movement is so elementary that the drafters of the BoR didn't think it necessary to mention it; it probably did not occur to them that any state would ever try to infringe freedom of movement.
@moonbus
If you think THAT is bad, look at Idaho passing a law making a girl a criminal if she as an Idaho citizen dares to cross state lines to ANY other state allowing abortion, she is now a criminal if she goes back to Idaho.
Pretty inhuman to me.
Besides going directly against the constitution, I think amendment 14 if I am not mistaken:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-14/section-1/interstate-travel
@mott-the-hoople saidI think Paul was the one who wrote that not Jesus
to paraphrase, Jesus said a man that wont work shouldnt eat, isnt worth the salt in his bread
1 edit
@athousandyoung saidwont work is in there over a hundred times…the bible is the word of Jesus
I think Paul was the one who wrote that not Jesus
3 edits
@kellyjay said1. They have done nothing good or bad even with a corrupt nature innocent.
They have done nothing good or bad even with a corrupt nature innocent. If you find taking their life’s a good thing you are without a showing your true nature.
You are talking in contradictions. One cannot be innocent and have a corrupt nature. To have a corrupt nature is to be evil, and therefore not innocent.
2. If you find taking their life’s a good thing you are without a showing your true nature.
I already know what you think my nature is. Still, you attribute opinions to me which I do not hold.
@mott-the-hoople saidNo the Bible is the word of many different people writing before Jesus was born and after he died
wont work is in there over a hundred times…the bible is the word of Jesus
@moonbus saidWe are all flawed with the same nature, but even there, the unborn have not done anything good or bad. Their lives are not ours to end just because. If you are okay with that there is another evil that you must be blind to.
In your Book, no one is innocent; everyone is evil. I've heard you say so, more than once.
@moonbus saidYour nature is no different than anyone else' and you have seen what we are capable of.
1. They have done nothing good or bad even with a corrupt nature innocent.
You are talking in contradictions. One cannot be innocent and have a corrupt nature. To have a corrupt nature is to be evil, and therefore not innocent.
2. If you find taking their life’s a good thing you are without a showing your true nature.
I already know what you think my nature is. Still, you attribute opinions to me which I do not hold.
@mott-the-hoople saidMr. Two Corinthians right here.
to paraphrase, Jesus said a man that wont work shouldnt eat, isnt worth the salt in his bread