Originally posted by no1marauderNo1: " .... about driving the evildoers from RHP."
"Defender of the Undefendable" would be a really cool Forum title for me; too bad it doesn't fit. You seem to be wanting to put your superhero tights on again and fantasize about driving the evildoers from RHP. It's OK by me ...[text shortened]... mental health. I guess that's just my caring and nurturing side.
You have the audacity to talk about driving people away from RHP ?
You are the one who wanted the proselytisers to drive away and guess what ? You made such a fuss together with others that there wasn't another choice than to create a new forum. You damned pseudo-liberal. You together with others drove them away. I now wished I had taken the stance to ban you from the site after the proselytisers had agreed to restrain themselves but you carried on with your name calling, degrading and insulting tactics.
You damned religious equivalent of an ethnic cleanser.
Originally posted by ivanhoeI'm loved by many. Try not to let it bother you soooooooo much, Ivanhoe.
You can bet on that, Mousie ......
..... in the meanwhile, please try to get some counselling by the Wolfpack preacher, the supporter and friend of all bullies, the Reverend "Captain" Kirk. He likes you and the things you do ........😛
Originally posted by ivanhoeGee, I hope your day job isn't writing History books; your memory and research skills seem pretty abysmal. The threads are still up for anyone to peruse; they'll see who was doing most of the insulting and degrading esp. concerning other religions which aren't Fundamentalist Christian. It would have been a quite interesting tactic for you to lobby for me to be banned for responding to intolerant, bigoted posts by saying they were intolerant and bigoted but I suspect if anybody would have gotten banned it was the people posting such trash (remember dodger11?) and not me. Would have been fun to see ya try it though.
No1: " .... about driving the evildoers from RHP."
You have the audacity to talk about driving people away from RHP ?
You are the one who wanted the proselytisers to drive away and guess what ? You made such a fuss together with others that there wasn't another choice than to create a new forum. You damned pseudo-liberal. You together with others drov ...[text shortened]... ling, degrading and insulting tactics.
You damned religious equivalent of an ethnic cleanser.
Originally posted by no1marauder
Spoken like a true know-it-all-bigot. Not only can't you grasp the simple fact that is repeated in numerous posts that deaf people don't think of themselves as "handicapped" or "missing something" but you really aren't paying attention to the thread at all. If the only issue is whether people like you will stick yer nose in the air and disapprove of somebody else that's of no interest to me; It's none of yours, mine or the government's business what these people did.
Clearly then its no business of yours what a paedophile does to his children ? I take it female circumcision is also right up your broad path of morality ?
And BTW, I remember you whining and crying about things said at Forum Wars (not by me) jokingly concerning your family; you felt at the time it should warrant banning from RHP to say such things.
LOL, I prefectly understood RHP's limited control over FW and appealed to Russ for banning on BBarr and RC over their highly offensive posts on RHP forums . Needless to say after the uproar over Crib's ban, RHP would never have banned one of its top players, but worth a try anyway.
Now, however, you seem to feel free to insinuate things about my personal life (which, of course, you know nothing about) on this site. Perhaps you'd explain to me why your comments above don't deserve a banning if off-site comments about someone's family do.
Amusing effort at playing the martyr. You seem to have little problem dishing out the dirt, indeed you wash your hands clean over any comments made at FW or any topics in my honour! As I've stated, nothing said at FW could lead to a ban at RHP, it just showed what jerks you all were, but then that truely never came as a shock. Curious though, I believe you would really really love it should I join FW so you can give me a piece of your mind 😉 Until then, in the spirit of remaining within the limits of RHP moderation, I see no reason why I shouldn't tell you what I think of you. See, if I do overstep my bounds, all you have to do is alert my posts, for as you well know when you overstep the bounds at RHP, your posts will get removed. So in conclusion, I suggest if you're to continue berating and insulting other RHP members, say Darfius and Ivan (just to name a few), please don't expect pity. You're a big boy no1, and as you stated, you're really good at talking tough online. True Darfius and a few other Christians won't dish it out with ya, but as my time here is running close to an end, I figure we may aswell be blunt about our opinions, don't you agree ?
Originally posted by pcaspian
Clearly then its no business of yours what a paedophile does to his children ? I take it female circumcision is also right up your broad path of morality ?
The fact that you would consider deafness and pedophila in the same category
only demonstrates the perversion of your thought process.
Nemesio
Originally posted by NemesioNemo,
Originally posted by pcaspian
[b]Clearly then its no business of yours what a paedophile does to his children ? I take it female circumcision is also right up your broad path of morality ?
The fact that you would consider deafness and pedophila in the same category
only demonstrates the perversion of your thought process.
Nemesio[/b]
Please consider that the referenced post has to do with "the abuse of the being" and not with the more focused comparison of "deaf vs pedophilia" that you imply?
You are just proving to me that you only want chimp credits here.
Consider the real questions. Please.
Just to help you out. The real question here is the abuse in cases a and b of a real child. Think about being locked into a certain chimp like world where only being right matters. I will await you in the wings.
Originally posted by StarValleyWyPlease ask someone who was sexually abused as a child and ask them if they feel like a victim.
Please consider that the referenced post has to do with "the abuse of the being" and not with the more focused comparison of "deaf vs pedophilia" that you imply?
I have a feeling that, invaraibly, the answer will be yes.
Please ask anyone born deaf if they feel like they are a victim. Or disabled. Or handicapped.
I think you will find that most will say that they do not feel like a victim. In fact, many of them
feel part of a culture of deafness, part of a group of people with a different view of the world.
Many describe their experience as enriched through their deafness.
Now, you may want to argue that this is 'making lemon juice out of lemons,' but I'm not going to
tell people that they are 'handicapped' when they, themselves, do not.
Nemesio
P.S., You are becoming illogical with your 'chimp credits.' How can arguing an unpopular and
controversial opinion be 'seeking chimp credits?' The vast majority of posters in this thread view
my explanation as 'evil' or just plain wrong. Wouldn't the chimp be seeking to agree with the
'winning side?' You're becoming less and less consistent with the issuing of chimp credits. Pretty
soon, the only person not collecting chimp chips in your mind will be you.
Originally posted by NemesioGranted and granted.
Please ask someone who was sexually abused as a child and ask them if they feel like a victim.
I have a feeling that, invaraibly, the answer will be yes.
Please ask anyone born deaf if they feel like they are a victim. Or disabled. Or handicapped.
I think you will find that most will say that they do not feel like a victim. In fact, many of them
fee ...[text shortened]... p credits. Pretty
soon, the only person not collecting chimp chips in your mind will be you.
Then we come to the part where you think it is ok for an "adult" to try to deny 20% of the universe to a child.
Why is that ok?
Originally posted by StarValleyWyThe question is not fair, because a deaf person claims that, while a
Granted and granted.
Then we come to the part where you think it is ok for an "adult" to try to deny 20% of the universe to a child.
Why is that ok?
percentage of the universe is closed to them (I don't know if we can
claim any number), another percentage is opened to them. I am
sure that they would argue that it balances out.
Nemesio
Originally posted by NemesioThat is at least a cogent paragraph, so i will try to explain my stupid and probably irrelevant ideas on the subject.
The question is not fair, because a deaf person claims that, while a
percentage of the universe is closed to them (I don't know if we can
claim any number), another percentage is opened to them. I am
sure that they would argue that it balances out.
Nemesio
What "magic" surplants one of the 5 senses that humans have?
A book or a story? Does that make it real? I would be more impressed had the 'deaf' couple moved off the tracks before the train killed them and their five screaming "hearing" children.