27 May '11 19:38>
Originally posted by FMFWith the first Huckabee was either lying or inexcusably ignorant.
Huckabee told a lie. Or two. A Dog bit a man. Twice, perhaps. There is no dispute over these things. The issue has become: why did you understate how many years Obama spent growing up in Indonesia when you surely must have known the true amount? And why do you still downplay the significance of the 'age 6 to 10' phase even now that your error - indeed, your pree ...[text shortened]... " - has been pointed out to you? Is it still simply a function of your dislike for Huckabee?
With the second Huckabee was flatout lying.
Point 1: Both are 100% provable regardless of how much time Obama spent in Indonesia. So your accusation that I deliberately lied about how much Obama spent in Indonesia fails the logic test.
Point 2: I have posted facts and figures quite often, AND quite often I check and verify facts before I post. Your claim that I post everything from memory is based on... well nothing at all.
Point 3: I made it clear when I made the claim that I was unsure of the exact time. "If I'm not mistaken" followed by a time range that I believed to be the case.
Point 4: AGAIN you continue to ignore my point that spending 14 of his 18 years growing up in the US (at least) gives the US a necessary mention. "Obama grew up in Indonesia" is a deception, whereas, "Obama spent some of his childhood in Indonesia" is not. You disagree?
Tell you what. Since you continue to deliberately ignore points you can't refute, I'll just start copying and pasting them.