Go back
Democracy ending in HK

Democracy ending in HK

Debates

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
23 Jun 21

This was so predictable; one China two systems would not work. The Chinese Communist Party is shutting down the free press in HK.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/23/media/apple-daily-closure-intl-hnk-dst/index.html

What a shame, the Communist Party feels so threatened by the free expression of opinion and views any criticism as treason.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
23 Jun 21

@moonbus said
This was so predictable; one China two systems would not work.
"One party two systems" was never a sincerely held belief by China. It was only a matter of time before China stripped Hong Kong of whatever little autonomy it had to begin with.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
23 Jun 21
2 edits

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
23 Jun 21
1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-protests-markets-explainer/explainer-how-important-is-hong-kong-to-the-rest-of-china-idUSKCN1VP35H

WHY DOES CHINA NEED HONG KONG AS IT IS?

Under the ‘one country, two systems’ formula agreed as part of Britain’s handover of the territory to China, Hong Kong is guaranteed liberties which are unavailable on the mainland.

These freedoms give Hong Kong a special status internationally, allowing it to negotiate trade and investment agreements independently from Beijing -- for instance, it does not have to pay the tariffs that the United States is imposing on Chinese imports.

They also mean foreign investors have more faith in Hong Kong’s legal and governance systems. China’s legal system is accountable to the Communist Party.

China uses Hong Kong’s currency, equity and debt markets to attract foreign funds, while international companies use Hong Kong as a launchpad to expand into mainland China

In short, the freedoms under "One Country, Two Systems" allows Hong Kong to be a cash-cow for China. However, as China's economy continues to grow, their reliance on Hong Kong diminishes, and China has less and less qualms about breaking their agreement.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
23 Jun 21

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
23 Jun 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
"So why wait--24 years--until 2021?" ---Duchess

Duchess obviously didn't know that either.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
23 Jun 21

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20411
Clock
23 Jun 21
1 edit

@moonbus said
This was so predictable; one China two systems would not work. The Chinese Communist Party is shutting down the free press in HK.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/23/media/apple-daily-closure-intl-hnk-dst/index.html

What a shame, the Communist Party feels so threatened by the free expression of opinion and views any criticism as treason.
Yes it was predictable and quite shameful of the CCP.

The same is happening to Taiwan too, unfortunately. I think for Hong Kong and Taiwan, their days
of being free of goo-goo totalitarian rule are coming to a sad end, unless Democratic nations
step up to protect them, especially Taiwan.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
23 Jun 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
"So why wait--24 years--until 2021?" ---Duchess

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
23 Jun 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
Yes it was predictable and quite shameful of the CCP.

The same is happening to Taiwan too, unfortunately. I think for Hong Kong and Taiwan, their days
of being free of goo-goo totalitarian rule are coming to a sad end, unless Democratic nations
step up to protect them, especially Taiwan.
Yes, I agree. Taiwan is certainly on Beijing’s agenda for annexation.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
23 Jun 21
1 edit

@vivify said
"So why wait--24 years--until 2021?" ---Duchess
Duchess asks a question, then when it's answered, she complains that she already knew the answer and is insulted that I answered her question.

Duchess has some psychological issues.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
23 Jun 21
1 edit

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
23 Jun 21

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
23 Jun 21
2 edits

The post that was quoted here has been removed
You're lying. Your question wasn't in the context of a rhetorical; you were genuinely looking for an answer to your "24 years" question, as evidenced by you alleging that if even if it were "2047", westerners would still criticize China for breaking their agreement.

Duchess is just embarrassed at her cognitive frailty in criticizing me for simply answering a question she clearly wanted to an answer to.

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20411
Clock
23 Jun 21

@vivify said
You're lying. You question wasn't in the context of a rhetorical; you were genuinely looking for an answer, as evidenced by you alleging that if even if it were "2047", westerners would still criticize China for breaking their agreement.

Duchess is just embarrassed at her cognitive frailty in criticizing me for simply answering a question she clearly wanted to an answer to.
Ya, the poster is near illiterate so, be gentle, Viv 🙂

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.