Dissent and Apparent Censorship by RHP

The post that was quoted here has been removed

The title of your thread is 'Dissent and Apparent Censorship by RHP.'

As it transpires there was no censorship and you had simply failed to find the thread concerned. So again, did I miss the apology to RHP due to your own ineptitude in locating a thread?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Why do you continuously hide behind 'apparent' or 'apparently' to facilitate false accusations?

Is it due to a complete lack of integrity or a reflection of your own atrocious literacy?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Dutchess is a fanatical hateful racist and a shameless pathological liar.
Have a nice day!

The post that was quoted here has been removed

But that's not how 'you' use 'apparently.' For you it is invariably followed by wild assumptions that are a million miles away from what another poster has actually written. Example:

Fred - 'I'm feeling happy this evening.'
Duchess - 'Apparently Fred is pleased that other people are not as happy as him. Also, Fred is near illiterate and a racist troll.'

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Bush Jr. had plenty of detractors in U.S. media, and there were widespread protests in America not only against the invasion but against Bush not letting the inspectors finish investigating WMDs before invading. Why were there protests from Americans against Bush? Because of U.S. media.

Again, diverse major Muslim countries such as Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia have refused so far to join the US-led chorus of condemnation against China. Does Vivify believe that Western governments sincerely care much more than Muslim-led governments about the supposed plight of foreign Muslims?

I've already addressed this: Muslims have a long history of genocide against each other: for example, Sunnis committing genocide against Shia or Iraq killing the Kurds. You have no point here.

Secondly, you mention countries who are also guilty of genocide: Turkey against Armenia, the Saudis in Yemen or Pakistan in Bangladesh. You expect nations that have committed genocide against other Muslims to speak out against Muslim genocide?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
The title of your thread is 'Dissent and Apparent Censorship by RHP.'

As it transpires there was no censorship and you had simply failed to find the thread concerned. So again, did I miss the apology to RHP due to your own ineptitude in locating a thread?

Hahahahahahahaha!
Great observation.
I might have seen it sooner if I'd put on my glasses.

Duchess64's cornered agony is worth every penny of the RHP Subscription that she doesn't pay. 😀

The post that was quoted here has been removed

What a stupid post. Even for you.

There is so much wrong here, it's hard to pick where to begin.

1) The number of people killed doesn't determine genocide. What ignorance from Duchess. Genocide is determined by whether a certain demographic, like an ethnic group, is targeted for elimination.

2) You trying to make a 100,000 deaths sound insignificant is abhorrent. This is a serious character defect which explains your reputation as a hostile poster. Minimizing 100,000 deaths like this is sociopathic.

3) Is this how you want to defend China? That China isn't committing genocide if it kills only 1 percent of a population of 1.4 billion?

Jesus Christ, what a despicable thing to post.