Go back
Dissent and Apparent Censorship by RHP

Dissent and Apparent Censorship by RHP

Debates


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Please link to where I said that or to where it could be implied.

1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Except that's not what Turkey is doing: they are actively denies genocide to this day:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/17/world/europe/turkeys-century-of-denial-about-an-armenian-genocide.html

A Century After Armenian Genocide, Turkey’s Denial Only Deepens

You're using a nation that denies genocide even happened as a defense of China's genocide.

Your posts are complete rubbish.

1 edit


1 edit

1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Man that's some vague criteria. How many is *enough*? And what source is "reliable"? I'm guessing one that sides with China? You, like Trump, will declare any source that verifies China's genocide as "fake news" or "biased" or some variant of that word.

Duchess has already condemned the entire western hemisphere of the world at unreliable and biased, frequently calling westerners ignorant (which she recently said doesn't include only majority whites nations, but any nation from the West) , and will reject any and all reports coming from this side of the planet.

Also, how many reports does Duchess expect to come from a nation that blocks it's own citizens from obtaining information and puts restrictions internet access? China recently banned the BBC from airing in China just for sharing news that was negative about China. To expect a slew of reports from such a country's activity is disingenuous.

For what it's worth:

https://apnews.com/article/269b3de1af34e17c1941a514f78d764c

https://newlinesinstitute.org/uyghurs/the-uyghur-genocide-an-examination-of-chinas-breaches-of-the-1948-genocide-convention/

Here are two independent and trustworthy sources detailing China's genocide. The Guardian uses the second link as a source for one of it's articles, which should speak to it's reliability.

1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Duchess is ignorant of Turkey's human rights abuses against it's own people:

https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/turkey#

Using Turkey as a defense of China's genocide against Turkic people is severely unintelligent.


Duchess mentions Iran not speaking up against China as a defense China's genocide, showing her ignorance of Iran's severe and barbaric human rights abuses:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde13/021/1990/en/

Duchess expects a nation with a history torture and dismembering political dissidents to speak up against China's human rights abuses? Laughable.

2 edits

1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
One of these days when I recover my strength, I want to do some checks on your
responses to posters and see what % of them you attack the poster instead of the issue.


@earl-of-trumps said
One of these days when I recover my strength, I want to do some checks on your
responses to posters and see what % of them you attack the poster instead of the issue.
86%

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.