Go back
Do we seek autocracy in crises?

Do we seek autocracy in crises?

Debates

4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Cincinnati’s namesake went back to the plow (actually a wealthy ‘farmer’ ).

Others manufacture or opportunistically catch the wave.

Is this about to happen...again?

Some end upside down on a rope.

Others, immortalized in marble. Until tipped.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit

@js357 said
Cincinnati’s namesake went back to the plow (actually a wealthy ‘farmer’ ).

Others manufacture or opportunistically catch the wave.

Is this about to happen...again?

Some end upside down on a rope.

Others, immortalized in marble. Until tipped.
History says yes we do and in certain circumstances it is functional as a lesser evil choice. The problem for democracy is when the potential autocracy creates the crises in order to justify itself.
If you mean the possibility of a Trump Autocracy then yes he’s giving it a go but not sure he’ll succeed 🤞

1 edit

@kevcvs57 said
History says yes we do and in certain circumstances it is functional as a lesser evil choice. The problem for democracy is when the potential autocracy creates the crises in order to justify itself.
If you mean the possibility of a Trump Autocracy then yes he’s giving it a go but not sure he’ll succeed 🤞
However this seems separate from what the US has always done -- look to leaders for calm, competent leadership. FDR's fireside chats, for example. I wouldn't call that 'autocracy'.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
However this seems separate from what the US has always done -- look to leaders for calm, competent leadership. FDR's fireside chats, for example. I wouldn't call that 'autocracy'.
Very separate but we are all prepared to invest our leaders with at least temporary autocratic powers in the face of a serious existential threat.
I’m not sure how many of those the US has had but this most recent one is a good example of a potential autocrat trying to ferment / fabricate an internal crises in the hope of gaining extra powers or at least holding onto the powers that he has.
He got elected partly by claiming that the rest of the world was taking advantage of the US and don’t forget the false claims concerning the hostile invasion of your southern Border.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Surely one of the purposes of democracy is to empower a
government with autocratic powers in times of emergency?

Dithering over Brexit for years maybe sensible but it is not
a good strategy for dealing with a pandemic.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@js357 said
Cincinnati’s namesake went back to the plow (actually a wealthy ‘farmer’ ).

Others manufacture or opportunistically catch the wave.

Is this about to happen...again?

Some end upside down on a rope.

Others, immortalized in marble. Until tipped.
I like your style JS.

Hanging upside-down on a rope, the aspiring marble-heads will eventually fatigue; let go, crash to the tarmac and crumble into a heap of shards.

But there'll still be ample opportunity for the opportunists to manufacture... brooms.


@kevcvs57 said
Very separate but we are all prepared to invest our leaders with at least temporary autocratic powers in the face of a serious existential threat.
I’m not sure how many of those the US has had but this most recent one is a good example of a potential autocrat trying to ferment / fabricate an internal crises in the hope of gaining extra powers or at least holding onto the p ...[text shortened]... of the US and don’t forget the false claims concerning the hostile invasion of your southern Border.
You are right. I'm just trying to make sure the distinction is clear.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@wolfgang59 said
Surely one of the purposes of democracy is to empower a
government with autocratic powers in times of emergency?

Dithering over Brexit for years maybe sensible but it is not
a good strategy for dealing with a pandemic.
Yes as long as those powers are invested in a truly democratic body who aren’t trying to use the perception of crisis in order to circumvent the democratic process.
It could be argued Trump is doing that with his verbal and administrative attacks on the postal vote during the pandemic.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
However this seems separate from what the US has always done -- look to leaders for calm, competent leadership. FDR's fireside chats, for example. I wouldn't call that 'autocracy'.
Yes but FDR died in his third term.

And the GOP has been trying to repeal the New Deal since Reagan.

I’d nominate Eisenhower as the president who had the opportunity to become a dictator and held back. But he had the examples of Il Duce and Der Fuhrer to contemplate.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
No, but I like the metaphor.