1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, Trump failing doesn't mean "we" fail.
The agency you speak of…..what are newsworthy items that it has done? Like daily digging, fixing , ,,,do you know that Biden administration never fired anybody. Tell us how successful that agency must’ve been to seem to do perfect work day and day.afterday.
Everyone, this is quite strange… I think that the smattering of posts by marauder are telling us that , no ques ...[text shortened]... ything Trump does..
He wants trump to fail,which means we all fail. He does not give a crap.
Most of his ideas are terrible and their failure would be a positive for the rest of us.
@no1marauder said"Most of his ideas are terrible and their failure would be a positive for the rest of us."
No, Trump failing doesn't mean "we" fail.
Most of his ideas are terrible and their failure would be a positive for the rest of us.
us being tranies and queers right?
@no1marauder saiddont want to talk about politico ehhh?
No, Trump failing doesn't mean "we" fail.
Most of his ideas are terrible and their failure would be a positive for the rest of us.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidHow can I? You gave no link or information supporting any idea that there wasn't a legitimate purpose for the spending.
dont want to talk about politico ehhh?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidYou really must get punched in the face a lot; talking crap like this on the internet makes you the lowest type of punk.
"Most of his ideas are terrible and their failure would be a positive for the rest of us."
us being tranies and queers right?
@no1marauder saidI tell it like it is bub!
You really must get punched in the face a lot; talking crap like this on the internet makes you the lowest type of punk.
@no1marauder saidMarauder says that if Trump Fails in trying to get a more efficient government, and realigning our country properly with the loser countries, that our country will not feel the effects of his Failure. Uhhhh, are y'all making note of all this unbelievable hogwash?? I keep a journal, you can order one from Amazon, the rich guy's company.
No, Trump failing doesn't mean "we" fail.
Most of his ideas are terrible and their failure would be a positive for the rest of us.
It is not fair for him to have all that money. I don't know why it is unfair, I just know it when I see it.
@no1marauder saidMarauder has to have links, like a baby needs his binkie. I do so much wish Marauder would leave that protective nest he occupies and wing it au 'naturale.
How can I? You gave no link or information supporting any idea that there wasn't a legitimate purpose for the spending.
Then we could see what makes him tick, Let me know if I, Average Joe, am leaving anything hanging in my posts, and if I pontificate. I do not like pontificating. Even Sonhouse does not pontificate.
@AverageJoe1 saidThere is no opposite of consequence. Time happens without our doing and things happen tomorrow in the framework of the parameters set today...
I get your question, about understanding the consequences. But you say that, as if you know what the consequences will be. What is the opposite of a consequence? I bet we will find some of those out there under a rock.
There may be no consequences. There are a lot of smart people in various rooms at various times hammering out these details because it is not just gonn ...[text shortened]... ue to hear all this.
I guess impeachers are in the wings , how come it is not front page news?
I don't claim to know what will happen in the administration, but I forecast, taht if epople just remocve structures without a very good plan in place to replace them the probabilty for a more dysfunctional system is higher than for a more functional.
@Ponderable saidWhy do you ASSume there is no plan to replace them?
There is no opposite of consequence. Time happens without our doing and things happen tomorrow in the framework of the parameters set today...
I don't claim to know what will happen in the administration, but I forecast, taht if epople just remocve structures without a very good plan in place to replace them the probabilty for a more dysfunctional system is higher than for a more functional.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidEnlighten me about the plan. All I hear is: we will remove people (even from CIA) and thus save money, which might be true but seems a bit shortsighted.
Why do you ASSume there is no plan to replace them?
@Ponderable saidPlease elaborate. What is the structure you speak of ? AID agency? You think it needs to be REPLACED!!?!??!?!!???!?!?!
There is no opposite of consequence. Time happens without our doing and things happen tomorrow in the framework of the parameters set today...
I don't claim to know what will happen in the administration, but I forecast, taht if epople just remocve structures without a very good plan in place to replace them the probabilty for a more dysfunctional system is higher than for a more functional.
If that, I suggest the recipients of our money go to other countries to get money.
@AverageJoe1 saidSo about 2 million people working in the public service got the mail to take a buyout.
Please elaborate. What is the structure you speak of ? AID agency? You think it needs to be REPLACED!!?!??!?!!???!?!?!
If that, I suggest the recipients of our money go to other countries to get money.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/opm-implementing-musks-doge-plans-sends-federal-workers/story
I just send the first link in a search for the source. To just kick out people is to destrioy structures.
We could make an example out of the Department of Eductation if you want to.
1 edit
@Ponderable saidDoes the USA have/owe a duty to employ these people if they are no longer needed, or if they are not performing their jobs satisfactorily? Do you think for a second that their employer/employers would fire them if they were fit for the job and performed properly??
So about 2 million people working in the public service got the mail to take a buyout.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/opm-implementing-musks-doge-plans-sends-federal-workers/story
I just send the first link in a search for the source. To just kick out people is to destrioy structures.
We could make an example out of the Department of Eductation if you want to.
My questions are too simple.
@AverageJoe1 saidbe assured that you r question are not too simple.
Does the USA have/owe a duty to employ these people if they are no longer needed, or if they are not performing their jobs satisfactorily? Do you think for a second that their employer/employers would fire them if they were fit for the job and performed properly??
My questions are too simple.
Does the USA have/owe a duty to employ these people if they are no longer needed, or if they are not performing their jobs satisfactorily?
No. It should be shown first that this is the case.
So if a structure is superfluous then the people are not longer needed, the agency can be outphsed in a correct way. So if the congress founded and funded the agency, the congress should also have a say in the removal - correction: the congress is the only institution to remove the institution.
If persons are not preforming their tasks, they can be fired.
However if you indicriminently send all the notice, the barest standards are not met.
So you claim that USAID is superfluous. That might be the case or not. It is the US congress which established the organization. Why is the congress not even asked?