21 Nov '10 15:00>
I read this interesting article in Slate that points out that female participation in the labor force is much lower in the Netherlands than in virtually all other industrialized countries at least as far as full time work. From the piece:
Though the Netherlands is consistently ranked in the top five countries for women, less than 10 percent of women here are employed full-time. And they like it this way. Incentives to nudge women into full-time work have consistently failed. Less than 4 percent of women wish they had more working hours or increased responsibility in the workplace, and most refuse extended hours even when the opportunity for advancement arises. Some women cite the high cost of child care as a major factor in their shorter hours, but 62 percent of women working part time in the Netherlands don't have young children in the house, and mothers rarely increase their working hours even when their children leave home.
http://www.slate.com/id/2274736/
This article gives further details and advances some reasons for this interesting phenomena: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3946
It concludes: Women are satisfied working part-time, because relatively high-skilled work can be done part-time, full-time work is not a financial necessity, and the burden of additional working hours is not shared within partnered families. Whereas financial incentives have been successful in increasing female participation rates, they have hardly influenced female working hours.
I find this fascinating and wonder whether this model would be preferable to the situation that exists in the US where the majority of mothers with young children work.
Comments?
Though the Netherlands is consistently ranked in the top five countries for women, less than 10 percent of women here are employed full-time. And they like it this way. Incentives to nudge women into full-time work have consistently failed. Less than 4 percent of women wish they had more working hours or increased responsibility in the workplace, and most refuse extended hours even when the opportunity for advancement arises. Some women cite the high cost of child care as a major factor in their shorter hours, but 62 percent of women working part time in the Netherlands don't have young children in the house, and mothers rarely increase their working hours even when their children leave home.
http://www.slate.com/id/2274736/
This article gives further details and advances some reasons for this interesting phenomena: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3946
It concludes: Women are satisfied working part-time, because relatively high-skilled work can be done part-time, full-time work is not a financial necessity, and the burden of additional working hours is not shared within partnered families. Whereas financial incentives have been successful in increasing female participation rates, they have hardly influenced female working hours.
I find this fascinating and wonder whether this model would be preferable to the situation that exists in the US where the majority of mothers with young children work.
Comments?