@earl-of-trumps saidThanks, brother, I knew I could count on you when my back was turned.
You fokking liar. you suck
@metal-brain saidNo1's "vitriol" was always deserved by the people he targeted. It wasn't actually vitriol, either, it is usually clear facts refuting the absurd claims of others, who need their claims refuted. Ditto "ad hominem" attacks, which are generally deserved as well. It is rather obvious when people are trolling, because they post idiotically, which, even though it may be their "opinion", it is often completely scientifically invalid (I'm looking at you here), and so should be refuted, early and often. The people making these ridiculous claims are often stupid and uneducatable, thus the "ad hominem" attacks. When you are stupid, and post stupidly, you should be attacked for it.
"she was utterly intolerant of any opinion that even slightly disagreed with her own and turned virtually every thread she was involved in into a nasty exchange (usually one-sided) of personal attacks and insults."
That describes you perfectly.
"She had ample opportunity to conform her behavior here to the required standards of the posting guidelines, but refused ...[text shortened]... ? You are projecting again. Does that help you fool yourself into thinking you are not like Duchess?
@suzianne saidanother clique member throwing cover for a partner.
No1's "vitriol" was always deserved by the people he targeted. It wasn't actually vitriol, either, it is usually clear facts refuting the absurd claims of others, who need their claims refuted. Ditto "ad hominem" attacks, which are generally deserved as well. It is rather obvious when people are trolling, because they post idiotically, which, even though it may be their " ...[text shortened]... "ad hominem" attacks. When you are stupid, and post stupidly, you should be attacked for it.
@metal-brain saidClearly, sonhouse had nothing to do with Duchess being banned. If anyone "triggered" her banning, it was not someone who regularly posts here.
I noticed sonhouse the snitch didn't deny getting Duchess banned.
Creating this thread knowing Duchess cannot defend herself is the act of a coward.
Does sonhouse have a confession to make? Does he have the courage to admit he was being vengeful?
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidYou are invited to refute anything I just said.
another clique member throwing cover for a partner.
I'm actually surprised that you can even spell "clique". More surprised that you know the word, I'm less surprised to see you use it.
@earl-of-trumps saidThis coming from the king of unwarranted ad hominems.
You fokking liar. you suck
"All lefties lie."
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidAwwww, man......you just made us miss Duchess. Why, she would love to be able to put (sic) after losers' !
well it is no surprise how you losers' operate
She will figure a way to slide back in under the circus tent.
@metal-brain saidDuchess got herself banned, by repeatedly and flagrantly violating the ToS.
I noticed sonhouse the snitch didn't deny getting Duchess banned.
Creating this thread knowing Duchess cannot defend herself is the act of a coward.
Does sonhouse have a confession to make? Does he have the courage to admit he was being vengeful?
There's no story here. Move along, folks.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 29080
@suzianne saidThank you, @Suzi
This is closer to the truth than most of the knee-jerk judgements people have made about her here. She had a difficult childhood and this perhaps stunted her ability to interact socially. But she wasn't a horrible person. She was just frustrated by having to interact in this forum with a culture she was less familiar with. She had an attenuated ability to sense when peop ...[text shortened]... these forums. She added a much-needed spice to counteract the boring sameness of most threads here.
I'm glad you posted that.
@suzianne saidI assume your last sentence would apply to me. It is a hard job, I wouldn’t do it if I weren’t getting paid. Better me than Sonhouse.
This is closer to the truth than most of the knee-jerk judgements people have made about her here. She had a difficult childhood and this perhaps stunted her ability to interact socially. But she wasn't a horrible person. She was just frustrated by having to interact in this forum with a culture she was less familiar with. She had an attenuated ability to sense when peop ...[text shortened]... these forums. She added a much-needed spice to counteract the boring sameness of most threads here.
OK, throw me a hard ball. Like, a simple question😒