Originally posted by der schwarze RitterCan you adduce a source for that statement? Everything I've read suggests that we've heard nothing since they went into debriefing except allegations that some of them were held in solitary confinement.
They think they are heroes
I was very interested in the USS Pueblo link no.1 posted a little earlier - I'd forgotten all about that, but the parallels are astonishing.
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeIf all British military personnel were to behave like these, then perhaps I am biased. Contrast the actions of the British military personnel who collaborated with the enemy, gave fake "confessions," apologized to Iran, appeared on TV with glowing praise of the treatment by their captors and lastly, left Iran in smart new Iranian-tailored suits instead of their own British-issued military garb with the U.S. Military Code of Conduct:
Pssst - your anti-British bias is showing.
http://www.usmcpress.com/heritage/code_conduct.htm
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterSo why didn't you court-martial Commander Bucher?
If all British military personnel were to behave like these, then perhaps I am biased. Contrast the actions of the British military personnel who collaborated with the enemy, gave fake "confessions," apologized to Iran, appeared on TV with glowing praise of the treatment by their captors and lastly, left Iran in smart new Iranian-tailored suits ...[text shortened]... with the U.S. Military Code of Conduct:
http://www.usmcpress.com/heritage/code_conduct.htm
Originally posted by AmauroteOne big difference. The Pueblo was unescorted.
Can you adduce a source for that statement? Everything I've read suggests that we've heard nothing since they went into debriefing except allegations that some of them were held in solitary confinement.
I was very interested in the USS Pueblo link no.1 posted a little earlier - I'd forgotten all about that, but the parallels are astonishing.
Edit: Out of necessity.
Originally posted by MerkBut in practice, neither was the British vessel - they were ambushed by overwhelming odds while returning from boarding another vessel with no time at all for the Cornwall to close. They had semi-automatic weapons - the Pueblo had machine-guns. Both crews were subject to heavy criticism from US domestic opinion and in both cases they were following the rules of engagement. I don't think either crew behaved ignobly - and frankly, when you consider that for all the legality of their presence, a British ship is only seven miles off the coast of Iran, you begin to appreciate the underlying frustration of the government in Tehran.
One big difference. The Pueblo was unescorted.
Edit: Out of necessity.
Originally posted by AmauroteI will never be convinced that what Iran did was anything near acceptable.
But in practice, neither was the British vessel - they were ambushed by overwhelming odds while returning from boarding another vessel with no time at all for the Cornwall to close. They had semi-automatic weapons - the Pueblo had machine-guns. Both crews were subject to heavy criticism from US domestic opinion and in both cases they were following the rule ...[text shortened]... coast of Iran, you begin to appreciate the underlying frustration of the government in Tehran.
As for the British sailors and their behavior, I have nothing but respect for them. It's not some Phaulking Rambo movie. Say what your captors want to hear. There is no reason to make them angry. Making some worthless admission is far better than a lifetime of trying to mental problems resulting from torture. What I feel most apathetic about toward these sailors is that out of the 15 I would bet that several of them are going to kick themselves in the butt for their admissions. Even if a person knows they did the right thing, it doesn't stop us from feeling like crap about it.
From what I can tell, everyone followed orders. No matter ehat a person thinks of the ROEs, I don't see how these sailors can be blamed.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterEver been kidnapped, held in a foreign country and denied consular access yourself?
If all British military personnel were to behave like these, then perhaps I am biased. Contrast the actions of the British military personnel who collaborated with the enemy, gave fake "confessions," apologized to Iran, appeared on TV with glowing praise of the treatment by their captors and lastly, left Iran in smart new Iranian-tailored suits ...[text shortened]... with the U.S. Military Code of Conduct:
http://www.usmcpress.com/heritage/code_conduct.htm
Originally posted by MerkThe point being made was that the contrary to DSR' assertions, American soldiers and sailors captured have done the same thing as the British did here i.e. make admissions of guilt or been used in propaganda. The members of the USS Pueblo did, captured flyers in the Gulf Wars did, etc. etc. etc. I agree this should not be held against them but apparently DSR doesn't (at least if they're British).
Lol!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought I had read that he made a call and was told not to engage?