30 Jan 21
@Earl-of-Trumps
That is because Trump fires up his base to attack the capitol building. THAT is why he got censored.
But of course, you being a false independent, you can never believe Trump could do ANYTHING wrong, could you?
You tell me: What has Trump done wrong in the past 4 years?
I assume you think he has NEVER done anything actually illegal.
The post that was quoted here has been removedFacebook has significant power and influence, and decisions like this are a clear
argument for the desperate need to regulate the tech behemoths that increasingly
decide who and what is heard."
This is unfortunately true. Mark Zuckerberg and the rest of the social media and tech giants never wanted their systems to be misused in this manner, nevertheless, they have taken only small steps to police themselves. Stricter Government regulation is ahead for these folks, and they have only themselves to blame for it.
@sonhouse saidworst case of TDS I ever saw. Why oh why does censoring only mean "Trump" to you?
@Earl-of-Trumps
That is because Trump fires up his base to attack the capitol building. THAT is why he got censored.
But of course, you being a false independent, you can never believe Trump could do ANYTHING wrong, could you?
You tell me: What has Trump done wrong in the past 4 years?
I assume you think he has NEVER done anything actually illegal.
Social media censoring of right wingers has been going on for along time.
Do you ever read anything other than Trump stories??
Jeezus. And you never stop! You are impressing me but not in the way you want
30 Jan 21
The post that was quoted here has been removedIt’s obvious Facebook is cracking down on extreme political views. No matter which side of the spectrum they are on.
I hardly see them cracking down on veganism or pacifism though. So the taegetting seems to be aimed at messages which rile people up.
And if you look at the polarisation in society and especially on social media, the way opinions escalate and the absurd amounts of violence it can lead to, I can quite understand them going down this route.
When I used to travel a lot (backpacking, say) there was a golden rule: be who you like, but don’t talk politics or religion.
It’s an old wisdom if one wants to keep people sane.
30 Jan 21
@metal-brain saidWrong as usual.
Facebook is censoring anything anti-establishment.
It never was about left or right. You just thought it was. Now that Trump is out the left is starting to realize they were short sighted for condoning censorship.
30 Jan 21
@shavixmir saidExtreme to who?
It’s obvious Facebook is cracking down on extreme political views. No matter which side of the spectrum they are on.
I hardly see them cracking down on veganism or pacifism though. So the taegetting seems to be aimed at messages which rile people up.
And if you look at the polarisation in society and especially on social media, the way opinions escalate and the absurd ...[text shortened]... u like, but don’t talk politics or religion.
It’s an old wisdom if one wants to keep people sane.
Anything against the establishment is extreme, right? Anything in the interest of the majority is extreme or radical, right?
I'm curious. Do you think McCarthyism was radical or normal?
30 Jan 21
@metal-brain saidFacebook isn’t banning material because it’s anti-establishment. It’s banning material which is inciting violence or propogating absolute lies as facts.
Extreme to who?
Anything against the establishment is extreme, right? Anything in the interest of the majority is extreme or radical, right?
I'm curious. Do you think McCarthyism was radical or normal?
McCarthyism was radicalism, mixed with fear and promoted by false rhetoric by people wanting more power / money.
30 Jan 21
@metal-brain saidYou’re on the wrong ward.
Avoiding a debate as usual.
You are on the wrong forum.
30 Jan 21
@shavixmir saidWhat is your source of information? Why did facebook reverse itself after censoring socialists? Did it decide inciting violence and lies were acceptable after all?
Facebook isn’t banning material because it’s anti-establishment. It’s banning material which is inciting violence or propogating absolute lies as facts.
McCarthyism was radicalism, mixed with fear and promoted by false rhetoric by people wanting more power / money.
McCarthyism was radicalism promoted by the establishment. Notice how it went unchecked and how actors were blacklisted and Chaplin left the country for work. Almost like exile.
Russiagate is radicalism too. The establishment has left that mostly unchecked as well. It has been debunked and they are still pushing that conspiracy theory. Has facebook made an equal effort with that?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/07/no_author/another-nail-in-russiagate-coffin/
There is a clear double standard your flawed logic is ignoring.
30 Jan 21
The post that was quoted here has been removedBiden is part of the right wing. Trump wanted to repeal section 230 and that threatened big tech. They want no liability and censorship at the same time.
I would rather have section 230 remain and no censorship, but if that cannot be attained repeal should happen as a last resort. They have no right having it both ways.