Originally posted by mateuloseHassan was an Iraqi thats why they didn't show it. They didn't want to upset their Islamic viewers with half a brain their head unlike you. They don't show killings of Moslems by the terrorists because they are the mouth piece of Al-Quaida.
How are beheadings anti-Jewish or Christian? How are beheadings any less a savage sight to see then a few of Iraqis geting firebombed and running in terror while engulfed in flames? (Fox news has shown such graphic footage before, especially at the start of the war, BTW, the Iraq war started while I was in Florida seeing my grand-father, so I did catch Fox ...[text shortened]... ence anyways, let ppl see the REAL violence, maybe they won't fight stupid wars if they do. . .
Originally posted by slimjimthe documentary contains footage from the actual channel which is both biased and offensive.
I saw it and it had a lot of BS in it. Fox already took them to the cleaners on that documentary.
if you just look at the difference in internet sites for fox and other channels around the world you can see that they approach the public with a definite agenda.
Originally posted by Paul DiracFox = Best
In the United States, viewers can also choose to watch CBS, which seems to have at least as much bias as Fox, but on the other end of the political spectrum.
CBS = worst
Just my opionion though 😛
do what Fox says to do, listen then decide, It dont say you have to believe everything it says. although I found Fox to be alot more acurate then CNN and CBS in most cases
besides, I wouldnt want any news agency to be outlawed. "Freedom of Speech," I dont like Canada's Laws that limits what you can say. It could lead to "only say what the goverments says to"
Originally posted by flyUnityI can catch FOX from 12am to 6am on TV here. I watch it for humour. Like their world weather map where they forget about France.
Fox = Best
CBS = worst
Just my opionion though 😛
do what Fox says to do, listen then decide, It dont say you have to believe everything it says. although I found Fox to be alot more acurate then CNN and CBS in most cases
besides, I wouldnt want any news agency to be outlawed. "Freedom of Speech," I dont like Canada's Laws that limits what you can say. It could lead to "only say what the goverments says to"
I think most people would agree that limiting what can be said is a breach of free speech. However that's not what FOX needs. It needs to stop reporting things as truth when they aren't. Any channel that proports to be news based should have a requirement to ensure everything they report is true. Anyone with journalistic intergrity should know that remaining impartial is crucial. Of course you can have opinion but label it as such.
Originally posted by XanthosNZThen you will enjoy Al-Jazeera....😲
I can catch FOX from 12am to 6am on TV here. I watch it for humour. Like their world weather map where they forget about France.
I think most people would agree that limiting what can be said is a breach of free speech. However that's not what FOX needs. It needs to stop reporting things as truth when they aren't. Any channel that proports to be news ...[text shortened]... d know that remaining impartial is crucial. Of course you can have opinion but label it as such.
Originally posted by XanthosNZEver think they didn't forget about France, just didn't like them?
I can catch FOX from 12am to 6am on TV here. I watch it for humour. Like their world weather map where they forget about France.
I think most people would agree that limiting what can be said is a breach of free speech. However that's not what FOX needs. It needs to stop reporting things as truth when they aren't. Any channel that proports to be news ...[text shortened]... d know that remaining impartial is crucial. Of course you can have opinion but label it as such.
Originally posted by flyUnityDid you watch the clip which I posted? Do you not think it funny that the piece posted which accuses BBC of anti Americanism, is so full of propoganda, half truths, and just downright lies. It refers to Dr David Kelly as 'some guy'. Ahem, he was one of the head weapons inspectors in Iraq. It says that he committed suicide because of the BBC. Ahem again, Tony Bliar released his name to the media, and then he committed suicide. The BBC had used an 'anonymous source'
Fox = Best
CBS = worst
Fox say that the BBC lied, but what the BBC claimed at the time, turned out to be the truth. Can anybody point me to a link where FOX apologise for their slander?
But hey, they invoked the flag of america so it must all be true. It seems to me that if you try to broadcast the truth, which may not side with the u.s., then you get labelled by FOX 'news' as being anti american and pro Iraqi.
That news piece reminds me of the news reader from the Simpsons. Listen to the way he emphasises some of the words, like 'LIED'. Comic genius. If half of the most warlike aggressive race of people in the world weren't being hoodwinked.
FlyUnity, seeing as u say Fox is the best, would you mind commenting on this piece of journalistic excellence, please. http://www.lyingliar.com/videos/files/glickinterview.wmv
Cheers,
D
Originally posted by RagnorakEvery Station has faults, Incuding Fox, But I wonder why I dont see a tread from you about CBS. CBS Giving false information that couldve inpacted an election.
Did you watch the clip which I posted? Do you not think it funny that the piece posted which accuses BBC of anti Americanism, is so full of propoganda, half truths, and just downright lies. It refers to Dr David Kelly as 'some guy'. Ahem, he was one of the head weapons inspectors in Iraq. It says that he committed suicide because of the BBC. Ahem aga ...[text shortened]... ic excellence, please. http://www.lyingliar.com/videos/files/glickinterview.wmv
Cheers,
D
They both have faults