Debates
23 Feb 23
23 Feb 23
She is 30yr old fascist liberal, who, in interviews (google thread title) has said to anyone who would listen regarding the investigation by the grand jury, that she believes something needs to happen.
Now tell me, my friends, in keeping with a solid honest forum foundation, if this thread gets traction, are you Ok with this person?
For the uninitiated, a grand jury listens to a whole lot of evidence to decide if a charge should be brought against a suspect. She has not heard the evidence .
I will start, by saying that she probably now needs to be investigated and charged herself.
@averagejoe1 saidYou halfwitted imbecile your claiming that the JURY FOREWOMEN hasn’t heard the evidence, I don’t know what the time is there Joe but the sun is definitely not over the yardarm over here so reign it in a bit.
She is 30yr old fascist liberal, who, in interviews (google thread title) has said to anyone who would listen regarding the investigation by the grand jury, that she believes something needs to happen.
Now tell me, my friends, in keeping with a solid honest forum foundation, if this thread gets traction, are you Ok with this person?
For the uninitiated, a gr ...[text shortened]... ce .
I will start, by saying that she probably now needs to be investigated and charged herself.
23 Feb 23
@averagejoe1 saidLol she has not heard the evidence?
She is 30yr old fascist liberal, who, in interviews (google thread title) has said to anyone who would listen regarding the investigation by the grand jury, that she believes something needs to happen.
Now tell me, my friends, in keeping with a solid honest forum foundation, if this thread gets traction, are you Ok with this person?
For the uninitiated, a gr ...[text shortened]... ce .
I will start, by saying that she probably now needs to be investigated and charged herself.
@wildgrass saidMy bad, I had thought she was running her mouth during the fact gathering. I hate it when people do that, or spread Disinformation (more on that later) so I just knee-jerked. She is still horrible by my book. I know none of you have ever made a remark that was later FALSE on the truth meter.
Lol she has not heard the evidence?
Did y'all see where Trump was exonerated? That is because they got nuthin on Trump. So the beat will go on. He will actually be running against Susan Rice, more on her later, too. (when I say running against her, she will not be the actual candidate).
23 Feb 23
@averagejoe1 saidFake news.
My bad, I had thought she was running her mouth during the fact gathering. I hate it when people do that, or spread Disinformation (more on that later) so I just knee-jerked. She is still horrible by my book. I know none of you have ever made a remark that was later FALSE on the truth meter.
Did y'all see where Trump was exonerated? That is because they got nuth ...[text shortened]... e, more on her later, too. (when I say running against her, she will not be the actual candidate).