Candidate Votes Percentage
Bush 10221 9.0 %
Kerry 87446 77.1 %
Cobb 4347 3.8 %
Nader 7622 6.7 %
Brown 2292 2.0 %
Peroutka 345 0.3 %
Badnarik 1279 1.1 %
For information purposes only, b4 the great patriots on here jump in and say they don't give a rat's ass what the rest of the world thinks.
D
The region specific votes are as follows:
Region Bush Kerry Other Total
Africa 192 (12.1% ) 1146 (71% ) 259 (16.9% ) 1559
Asia 1324 (14.8% ) 6778 (75.9% ) 819 (9.3% ) 8921
Australia 681 (8.5% ) 5725 (76.2% ) 1103 (15.3% ) 7509
Canada 780 (9.1% ) 6377 (74.2% ) 1430 (16.7% ) 8587
Central & South America 565 (9.8% ) 4599 (79.5% ) 622 (10.7% ) 5786
Europe 6378 (7.9% ) 62466(77.8% ) 11506 (14.3% ) 80350
Middle East 296 (37% ) 365 (45.6% ) 139 (17.4% ) 800
The world seems to be fairly consistent in its voting, apart from the Middle East, but I'm guessing the fact that there are probably more MARINES!!! HARRROOOO!!!! in the Middle East than Middle Easterners might influence that.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakAnd also that israel is likely to be very pro-Bush
The region specific votes are as follows:
Region Bush Kerry Other Total
Africa 192 (12.1% ) 1146 (71% ) 259 (16.9% ) 1559
Asia 1324 (14.8% ) 6778 (75.9% ) 819 (9.3% ) 8921
Australia 681 (8.5% ) 5725 (76.2% ) 1103 (15.3% ) 7509
Canada 780 (9.1% ) 6377 (74.2% ) 1430 (16.7% ) 8587
Central & South ...[text shortened]... re MARINES!!! HARRROOOO!!!! in the Middle East than Middle Easterners might influence that.
D
Originally posted by elvendreamgirlSorry, but if you're part of the 49% that didn't vote bush, then you mean nothing! That's how the greatest democracy in the world works isn't it? You went with a loser so you have no voice, you mean nothing!
Oi! Not all Americans support Bush, you know!!!!!!!
😛
I think Howardgee is right btw. As far as I can see american's justifications for voting bush were 1. They wanted lower taxes and 2. there hadn't been a terrorist attack (on american soil, we'll ignore the fact that terrorist attacks have risen every year since) since 911.
Ok, the idiot is after getting ye into massive budget deficits. What's going to pay that off? Tax! He's spending $61 million per hour on his war on Iraq? What's paying for that? Tax! So he promises not to raise tax (and we all know how truthful politicians are during election time). The only feasible explanation is that other areas are going to suffer, education, health, infrastructure. Bloody dumb (of the 51%, the rest of ye are nothing) not to be able to put 2 and 2 together and see the inevitable.
Now, as for no terrorist attacks since 911. How long do you think it took to plan 911? Think it was thought up, trained for and implemented in a matter of days? Weeks? Months? Years?
So look at an attack b4 911, the other attack on WTC. That was 1993, 8 years b4 911. A reasonable amount of time to expect Al Qaeda to spend planning 911. Do americans seriously expect another attack like 911 within 3 years? Dumb! Dumb! Dumb!
So 8 years was the time required b4. With bush acting as cheerleader to boost Al Qaeda determination and recruitment drive, I reckon you're probably looking at another within the next year or 2 at most.
D