GWB more dangerous than Kim Jong-Il

Originally posted by Pawnokeyhole
his rapid pro-American views.

Is that p supposed to be a b?

Or does he really just have very quick views on the US?

Originally posted by 7ate9
Go and check it out before you make false assumptions.

Why resort to abuse, because you have NOTHING to offer?

Why do constently hate GWB/yanks

Originally posted by rowpc
Why do constently hate GWB/yanks

Probably a grammatical thing.

Originally posted by shavixmir
Probably a grammatical thing.

nah, more like a hate thing

Originally posted by rubber duck
nah, more like a hate thing

God damn, you're witty boy...

Originally posted by Draxus
That just shows how ignorant popular opinion is. GWB is only a product of an already screwed up America.

Ignorance + whiney brits = this crap poll

I believe that when GWB is gone the next guy will step up and do the exact same thing, probably more covertly than the current president. The problem is our imperialistic culture and anybody who blames it o ...[text shortened]... understand his position, while I have no idea about Kim Jong-Il, not who he is or what he does.

I agree, if that poll had been taken in the Sun the result would have been the opposite...

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
I agree, if that poll had been taken in the Sun the result would have been the opposite...

Just because a poll is reported in a particular newspaper doesn't mean it was only conducted amongst the readers of that paper....

Originally posted by Redmike
Not really. I guess, if you want to be pedantic, then the question should have been about the threat to the prospects of world peace.

But take that up with the pollsters.

Tha fact remains that it seems a sizeable group of people in one of the US's main allies consider GWB more of a threat than North Korea, even in these times we're all being fed propaganda about how dangerous they are.

did they ask in the poll whether blair was more of a threat?

Originally posted by zeeblebot
did they ask in the poll whether blair was more of a threat?

no. somewhat like why they didn't ask if adolfs pet monkey was a threat

Originally posted by Pawnokeyhole
lest Ritter be unable to maintain his rabid pro-American views.

There is little that is truly American about Ritter's right-wing tirade.

Today Americans are turning against the party of Bush because we are waking up to the Bush regimes opposition to "freedom" (that vague concept we all like to talk about).

Originally posted by Wulebgr
There is little that is truly American about Ritter's right-wing tirade.

Today Americans are turning against the party of Bush because we are waking up to the Bush regimes opposition to "freedom" (that vague concept we all like to talk about).

I don't know about that: Last night we had over 13,000 go out on a Monday night for a campaign rally held at Reunion Arena, Dallas, Texas, for the President and the Texas Governor, yet only 250 protestors showed up.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/VideoPlayer/videoPlayer.php?vidId=99902&catId=513

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
I don't know about that: Last night we had over 13,000 go out on a Monday night for a campaign rally held at Reunion Arena, Dallas, Texas, for the President and the Texas Governor, yet only 250 protestors showed up.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/VideoPlayer/videoPlayer.php?vidId=99902&catId=513

How many protestors did you expect for a political rally?! I can't imagine why even 250 were there. What were they protesting?