Originally posted by no1marauder
You can read the details here: http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
The salient points: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant.
Snopes is a joke.
Without equivocation, she is derisive in her reactions to the elements of the case, including the knowledge that polygraph tests are faulty--- since she knew
her client was guilty.
So, ass wipe, let's be human for fifteen seconds.
It's your 12 year old daughter/sister/cousin who was clearly raped by a 41 year old man.
Are you willing to listen to his defense attorney concoct a bogus claim that your relation 'wanted it' and therefore consented--- you know: just to make sure he had a fair shot, an "ethical" shot at things?
You disgusting piece of vile crap.