Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    12091
    05 Nov '16 17:36
    http://www.breitbart.com/live/second-presidential-debate-fact-check-livewire/fact-check-yes-hillary-clinton-laugh-successfully-defending-child-rapist/


    She was 12 and he was 41. Hillary laughs about how she was able to free the rapist from jail knowing he did it.
  2. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    05 Nov '16 17:41
    Originally posted by Eladar
    http://www.breitbart.com/live/second-presidential-debate-fact-check-livewire/fact-check-yes-hillary-clinton-laugh-successfully-defending-child-rapist/


    She was 12 and he was 41. Hillary laughs about how she was able to free the rapist from jail knowing he did it.
    In defense of her, she was thinking of an amusing limerick.
  3. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    9780
    05 Nov '16 19:19
    Originally posted by Eladar
    http://www.breitbart.com/live/second-presidential-debate-fact-check-livewire/fact-check-yes-hillary-clinton-laugh-successfully-defending-child-rapist/


    She was 12 and he was 41. Hillary laughs about how she was able to free the rapist from jail knowing he did it.
    Not quite. I actually listened to the inerview a while back. She was actually laughing at being thrown into a serious case with little to no experience. Some republicans have tried to spin this as Hillary saying "lolz, rape". That's not the case.
  4. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    12091
    05 Nov '16 20:18
    Originally posted by vivify
    Not quite. I actually listened to the inerview a while back. She was actually laughing at being thrown into a serious case with little to no experience. Some republicans have tried to spin this as Hillary saying "lolz, rape". That's not the case.
    What do you think of Hillary blaming the rape on the little girl? How about the comnent of having her client take a polygraph test and no longer believing they are accurate?

    I believe there were two taped conversations where she laughed about the case?
  5. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    05 Nov '16 20:22
    Originally posted by Eladar
    http://www.breitbart.com/live/second-presidential-debate-fact-check-livewire/fact-check-yes-hillary-clinton-laugh-successfully-defending-child-rapist/


    She was 12 and he was 41. Hillary laughs about how she was able to free the rapist from jail knowing he did it.
    This feces has already been thrown on the wall several times on this forum; she didn't laugh about any rape and she defended her client to the best of her ability (it would have been unethical not to do so).

    As with so many desperate attacks by right wingers before this election, there is no substance here.
  6. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    05 Nov '16 20:33
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    This feces has already been thrown on the wall several times on this forum; she didn't laugh about any rape and she defended her client to the best of her ability (it would have been unethical not to do so).

    As with so many desperate attacks by right wingers before this election, there is no substance here.
    This election is real dirty for dirty.
  7. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    05 Nov '16 20:381 edit
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    This election is real dirty for dirty.
    What else can be expected? The Right has virtually no policies that the majority of voters favor (more tax cuts for the rich? Less regulation of banks? More people without health insurance? Cuts for Social Security and Medicare? I don't think so - even on immigration substantial majorities favor a path to citizenship for illegals), so their only hope is personal mud slinging.
  8. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    9780
    05 Nov '16 20:47
    Originally posted by Eladar
    What do you think of Hillary blaming the rape on the little girl? How about the comnent of having her client take a polygraph test and no longer believing they are accurate?

    I believe there were two taped conversations where she laughed about the case?
    What is the exact quote?
  9. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    05 Nov '16 20:50
    Originally posted by vivify
    What is the exact quote?
    You can read the details here: http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/

    The salient points: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant.
  10. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    05 Nov '16 20:52
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    What else can be expected? The Right has virtually no policies that the majority of voters favor (more tax cuts for the rich? Less regulation of banks? More people without health insurance? Cuts for Social Security and Medicare? I don't think so - even on immigration substantial majorities favor a path to citizenship for illegals), so their only hope is personal mud slinging.
    It would be interesting to see if Barron Trump, a so-called anchor baby, would lose his citizenship under a Trump presidency.
  11. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    12091
    05 Nov '16 21:22
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    This feces has already been thrown on the wall several times on this forum; she didn't laugh about any rape and she defended her client to the best of her ability (it would have been unethical not to do so).

    As with so many desperate attacks by right wingers before this election, there is no substance here.
    She defended her client with unethical practices which resulted in evidence disappearing. To do so would be unethical?

    Failing to blame the 12 year old girl for the rape would be unethical?

    Libtard ethics are unethical.
  12. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    12091
    05 Nov '16 21:24
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    You can read the details here: http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/

    The salient points: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant.
    I see you can believe anything if you wear libtard glasses.
  13. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    05 Nov '16 21:32
    Originally posted by Eladar
    She defended her client with unethical practices which resulted in evidence disappearing. To do so would be unethical?

    Failing to blame the 12 year old girl for the rape would be unethical?

    Libtard ethics are unethical.
    The facts don't matter to you, but please tell me what evidence disappeared in that case due to HRC's "unethical practices"?

    Yes it would be unethical to not defend your client to the best of your ability and in this case her client denied sexual contact. Unless you believe that every single person accused of a crime is necessarily guilty, it is hardly unethical to dispute an alleged victim's claims even if they are 12 years old.
  14. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    05 Nov '16 21:34
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    You can read the details here: http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/

    The salient points: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant.
    Snopes is a joke.
    Without equivocation, she is derisive in her reactions to the elements of the case, including the knowledge that polygraph tests are faulty--- since she knew her client was guilty.
    So, ass wipe, let's be human for fifteen seconds.
    It's your 12 year old daughter/sister/cousin who was clearly raped by a 41 year old man.
    Are you willing to listen to his defense attorney concoct a bogus claim that your relation 'wanted it' and therefore consented--- you know: just to make sure he had a fair shot, an "ethical" shot at things?

    You disgusting piece of vile crap.
  15. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    12091
    05 Nov '16 21:35
    The facts don't matter?

    Is it a fact that she had to take the case?
Back to Top