Go back
Hitler, pawn in a bigger game?

Hitler, pawn in a bigger game?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
I don't know that it was alerted. What I do know is that it was modded, which is normally preceded by an alert.

D
It might not have been alerted. Cheating accusations are often removed from threads, as they should be really.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Varg
Oh, I see.
Well a post of mine disappeared too which I didn't think contained anyhting controversial.
Did you quote a cheating accusation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
Did you quote a cheating accusation.
Could be.
I merely said that cheating accusations were not allowed in the forums.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by catfoodtim
Nonsense.

It is [b]because
of Powell and his ilk, not in spite of him, that Britain is in the mess it is in. Powell's brand of race-baiting and his call to arms against immigration leave a legacy where immigrants to England are often alienated, which is why we are in the position where young Muslims born and raised in England feel so excluded from ...[text shortened]... h society. It is the groups that are isolated rather than embraced that become so dissafected.[/b]
You are talking complete rubbish. Enoch Powell would never have allowed the aliens who are now preaching murder and mayhem into Britain in the first place.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by catfoodtim
Exactly.

I've taken it to Chris, with specific examples, and I'm waiting for feedback.

I'm hoping it will be more than just the removal of the offensive posts.

The terms of service quite clearly say:

[i]You agree to not use the Service to:

Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, ...[text shortened]... t to Chris numerous examples, in my opinion, of Philodor/Nargaguna's breach of these Terms.
Why do you think that persons you and communists like Redmike should be alloowed to say what you like whilst I should be gagged to suit you? The only reason you run to the moderators is that you cannot cope on your own, you poor pathetic specimen.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
Leave him be, he's just a harmless old knocker!
It's you lot from 'down under' who are the notorious knockers, I won't say of what since you would no doubt run off to the moderator as another of your cowardly compatriots has done.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by catfoodtim
Just to make this absolutely crystal clear for you:

I alerted some of your posts which, I felt, breach the terms of service, namely:

[i]You agree to not use the Service to:

Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of a ...[text shortened]... er users who find your posts offensive do so too, regardless of your name-calling and abuse.
Just for clarity regarding your second point about the old account that Philopastry had. It seems that a second or even third account is tolerated as long as previous accounts are never used once the new account is created. This does seem a bit odd to me but at least one moderator has done this themselves.

To your initial point though, I am amazed that Philopastry thinks it's his views that get his posts removed rather than the insulting, base, classless nastiness that he always uses to express them.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
Just for clarity regarding your second point about the old account that Philopastry had. It seems that a second or even third account is tolerated as long as previous accounts are never used once the new account is created.
In that case, why are STANG's new accounts being banned?

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Philodor
You are talking complete rubbish. Enoch Powell would never have allowed the aliens who are now preaching murder and mayhem into Britain in the first place.
Last time you brought him up you never did answer my question so I'll ask it again.
Powell is most famous for his Rivers of Blood speech which many people don't know was mostly about his opposition to proposed anti-discrimination laws. Do you agree with Powell's stance on anti-discrimination laws? That is, do you agree that racial prejudice (say in employment, housing or the law) should be allowed to exist in England?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
In that case, why are STANG's new accounts being banned?

D
what's he up to? around 10?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Philodor
It's you lot from 'down under' who are the notorious knockers, I won't say of what since you would no doubt run off to the moderator as another of your cowardly compatriots has done.
Knocker just happened to be an affectionate term given to one Enoch Powell by some of your country's better stand up comedians.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
In that case, why are STANG's new accounts being banned?

D
I imagine because STANG received a permanent ban then all his subsequent accounts did too.

EDIT: As far as I know, Nargaguna didn't receive a permanent ban, just a few days worth of forum ban. When that ban expired the Nargaguna account remained unused but we were suddenly introduced to our new friend.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.