Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 18 Apr '16 10:33
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aFo_BV-UzI

    analyses his speech level (it's 4th grade level), sentence structure, what words he uses and so on.

    i would also like to point out that in the example used (Kimmel asks "is it wrong to discriminate on religion" he spent 1 minute and 220 words to not even coming close to an answer to that particular question.

    people who do not support him know this. people who support him don't seem to care or don't realize.
  2. 18 Apr '16 10:51
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    people who do not support him know this. people who support him don't seem to care or don't realize.
    He comes across as a straight talking no-nonsense everyday person who does not put on airs. It is the fact that he lies non-stop that should be more of a concern than his supposed 'speech level'.
    Over in spirituality, it is often (not always) the people that use the biggest words that come across as having the worst personalities. The people who use simple English and bad language often come across as more honest.

    Here in SA our current president got in partly because he was seen as being closer to the people than his predecessor who was much better educated and spoke much better English.
  3. 18 Apr '16 10:55
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aFo_BV-UzI

    analyses his speech level (it's 4th grade level), sentence structure, what words he uses and so on.

    i would also like to point out that in the example used (Kimmel asks "is it wrong to discriminate on religion" he spent 1 minute and 220 words to not even coming close to an answer to that particular question ...[text shortened]... e who do not support him know this. people who support him don't seem to care or don't realize.
    I already did this thread
  4. 18 Apr '16 11:28
    Originally posted by whodey
    I already did this thread
    must have been lost among the massive amount of garbage you post.
  5. 18 Apr '16 14:51
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    must have been lost among the massive amount of garbage you post.
    Ironic coming from you.
  6. 18 Apr '16 19:40
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    must have been lost among the massive amount of garbage you post.
    So since I post garbage and then you turn around and post the same thing, does that mean you post garbage as well?
  7. 18 Apr '16 22:50
    Originally posted by JS357
    Ironic coming from you.
    huh thought we got along. always respected you and what you posted. must have been wrong. oh well, i will try hard to not lose sleep over it.
  8. 18 Apr '16 22:50
    Originally posted by whodey
    So since I post garbage and then you turn around and post the same thing, does that mean you post garbage as well?
    does not follow.
  9. 18 Apr '16 23:42 / 3 edits
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    huh thought we got along. always respected you and what you posted. must have been wrong. oh well, i will try hard to not lose sleep over it.
    Believe it or not (and I got three up-votes) I stupidly thought I was replying to Whodey: My treatment of of him compared to you elsewhere is my only support.
  10. 19 Apr '16 00:10
    Originally posted by JS357 to Zahlanzi
    Believe it or not (and I got three up-votes) I stupidly thought I was replying to Whodey: My treatment of of him compared to you elsewhere is my only support.
    "I stupidly thought I was replying to Whodey."
    --JS357 (to Zahlanzi)

    If JS357 had written "...you (Whodey)" rather than only "...you", readers would not have been misled.
  11. 19 Apr '16 04:50
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    "I stupidly thought I was replying to Whodey."
    --JS357 (to Zahlanzi)

    If JS357 had written "...you (Whodey)" rather than only "...you", readers would not have been misled.
    TRUE.
  12. 19 Apr '16 08:10
    Originally posted by JS357
    Believe it or not (and I got three up-votes) I stupidly thought I was replying to Whodey: My treatment of of him compared to you elsewhere is my only support.
    yeh, hoped so. i really think you are a reasonable poster. if you ever disagree with me, come out and say it.
  13. 19 Apr '16 13:14
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    does not follow.
    And you certainly can't lead either
  14. 19 Apr '16 15:18
    Originally posted by whodey
    And you certainly can't lead either
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)
  15. Subscriber Wajoma
    Die Cheeseburger
    19 Apr '16 15:24
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)
    Antithesis of logic: A post by zahlardi.