Originally posted by @wajomaI'm not opposed to shooting ranges.
I can think of two right here at the debates board who have been honest enough to state their true intention i.e. ban guns:
shav and gkr
I don't exactly see what the fun is, but hey, to each their own.
I'm not opposed to hunting weapons.
Sure, I think if you're gonna hunt a bear, do it with a spear like a real man, but hey, if you need a gun to bolster your manhood, sure...
(obviously park rangers, etc. need guns for their jobs).
I don't think you should have guns in the house.
And I certainly don't think you should be carrying guns in public. I don't think you should be carrying any weapon in public, if you want to know the truth.
And just so you know: I think all children between 8 and 11 years of age should have proper martial arts training at school. To teach them to protect themselves, but also to manage their anger and control their bodies.
2 edits
Originally posted by @shavixmirshav:
I'm not opposed to shooting ranges.
I don't exactly see what the fun is, but hey, to each their own.
I'm not opposed to hunting weapons.
Sure, I think if you're gonna hunt a bear, do it with a spear like a real man, but hey, if you need a gun to bolster your manhood, sure...
(obviously park rangers, etc. need guns for their jobs).
I don't thi ...[text shortened]... l. To teach them to protect themselves, but also to manage their anger and control their bodies.
"I am not blind.
The whole thread is about deflecting.
And we’re so sick of 30 threads about your guns and your killings and your stupidity, that we’re dragging your sorry arses back to what it’s really about.
Banning guns."
shav:
"Uh no.
The title, the OP, 1 student... your posts... they’re all aimed at diverting attention away from where it needs to be.
Why are you not banning guns?"
shav:
"I don't think you should have guns in the house." (AKA a ban)
shav:
"I don't think you should be carrying any weapon in public" (AKA a ban)
https://www.facebook.com/abcnews.au/videos/10157789312624988/
shavs minime:
24 Feb '18 01:35 "Don't be silly"(sic)
A short lesson for shav, repeat this before hitting the post button:
Mean what you say, say what you mean.
Originally posted by @wajomaFACT: the percentage of people killed or injured with guns when guns are in the house far outstrips the percentage of people killed or injured in the general population.
shav:
"I am not blind.
The whole thread is about deflecting.
And we’re so sick of 30 threads about your guns and your killings and your stupidity, that we’re dragging your sorry arses back to what it’s really about.
Banning guns."
shav:
[i]"Uh no.
The title, the OP, 1 student... your posts... they’re all aimed at diverting attention away ...[text shortened]... hav, repeat this before hitting the post button:
[b]Mean what you say, say what you mean.[/b]
But hey, the sacred NRA says we need guns so who gives a shyte how many people get killed by them, right?
I didn't see you answer the question of exactly why we need 100 round a minute rifles to hunt rabbits and deer.
The sacred NRA LOVES bumper guns and will send hundreds of millions of dollars to those hypocritical congressmen who fall over and play dead to their tune.
That MUST be ok since the NRA is the state religion.
Originally posted by @whodeyNormally, when looking at solving problems, one looks at the cause of the problem. And then via Plan-Do-Check-Act one solves the cause.
This is for all the lefties out there.
How should we go about banning guns? Should we go to the trouble of repealing the 2nd amendment or just reinterpret it, or just ignore it?
So, after studying the situation, I’ve come to the conclusion that we don’t need to ban guns.
We should just execute every single gun nut, NRA supporter and Republican.
For good measure: whining millenials as well.
Originally posted by @whodeyThe Second Amendment protects the right of Americans to organize into armed militias. That right was effectively abolished a long time ago.
This is for all the lefties out there.
How should we go about banning guns? Should we go to the trouble of repealing the 2nd amendment or just reinterpret it, or just ignore it?
1 edit
Originally posted by @wajomaI have provided a link explaining how people could still be playing with guns, looking at them, greasing them, stroking them, maybe giving them a courtesy lick. Even in my country.
I can think of two right here at the debates board who have been honest enough to state their true intention i.e. ban guns:
shav and gkr
I assume you read it?
Also, I asked you a (actually 2) question over in the "Madness" thread.
1 edit
Originally posted by @great-king-ratgkr:
I have provided a link explaining how people could still be playing with guns, looking at them, greasing them, stroking them, maybe giving them a courtesy lick. Even in my country.
I assume you read it?
Also, I asked you a (actually 2) question over in the "Madness" thread.
"I agree... with Shav. You should focus on getting rid of guns."
gkr:
"Good point.
The thread title is "How the f#ck are we going to stop this epidemic of mass shootings??"
The partial answer is: "Get rid of all your goddamn guns!""
That was just in the last few gkr posts.
Originally posted by @wajoma"I have provided a link explaining how people could still be playing with guns, looking at them, greasing them, stroking them, maybe giving them a courtesy lick. Even in my country.
gkr:
"I agree... with Shav. You should focus on getting rid of guns."
gkr:
"Good point.
The thread title is "How the f#ck are we going to stop this epidemic of mass shootings??"
The partial answer is: "Get rid of all your goddamn guns!""
That was just in the last few gkr posts.
I assume you read it?"
Originally posted by @great-king-ratShort attention span. Possibly childhood trauma or just a dumbass.
Would you like to adress the topic of gun control, Wujumu, or do you just want to focus on irrelevant sidestuff for a while?
1 edit
Originally posted by @wajomaNot exactly sure what your point is there, honey.
shav:
"I am not blind.
The whole thread is about deflecting.
And we’re so sick of 30 threads about your guns and your killings and your stupidity, that we’re dragging your sorry arses back to what it’s really about.
Banning guns."
shav:
[i]"Uh no.
The title, the OP, 1 student... your posts... they’re all aimed at diverting attention away ...[text shortened]... hav, repeat this before hitting the post button:
[b]Mean what you say, say what you mean.[/b]
I don’t believe in banning cars, but I do think cars should be banned from inner-city shopping districts.
Likewise. I don’t think guns need to be completely banned.
Morons like you should be banned from touching them and guns should be permitted in certain areas (like parks where rangers roam and shooting ranges).
So, again, not exactly sure what you’re getting at.
And everyone of my points you quote I agree with.
So, uh, yeah... carry on!
Feel to quote more of my posts; it’s good for my ego.