1. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87834
    24 Feb '18 03:45
    Originally posted by @wajoma
    I can think of two right here at the debates board who have been honest enough to state their true intention i.e. ban guns:

    shav and gkr
    I'm not opposed to shooting ranges.
    I don't exactly see what the fun is, but hey, to each their own.

    I'm not opposed to hunting weapons.
    Sure, I think if you're gonna hunt a bear, do it with a spear like a real man, but hey, if you need a gun to bolster your manhood, sure...
    (obviously park rangers, etc. need guns for their jobs).

    I don't think you should have guns in the house.
    And I certainly don't think you should be carrying guns in public. I don't think you should be carrying any weapon in public, if you want to know the truth.

    And just so you know: I think all children between 8 and 11 years of age should have proper martial arts training at school. To teach them to protect themselves, but also to manage their anger and control their bodies.
  2. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    24 Feb '18 05:00
    The consumer boycott of firms which "support" the NRA is a good start.

    People Power

    Those Right-Wingers love that don't they?
  3. SubscriberWajoma
    Die Cheeseburger
    Provocation
    Joined
    01 Sep '04
    Moves
    77986
    24 Feb '18 07:382 edits
    Originally posted by @shavixmir
    I'm not opposed to shooting ranges.
    I don't exactly see what the fun is, but hey, to each their own.

    I'm not opposed to hunting weapons.
    Sure, I think if you're gonna hunt a bear, do it with a spear like a real man, but hey, if you need a gun to bolster your manhood, sure...
    (obviously park rangers, etc. need guns for their jobs).

    I don't thi ...[text shortened]... l. To teach them to protect themselves, but also to manage their anger and control their bodies.
    shav:
    "I am not blind.
    The whole thread is about deflecting.
    And we’re so sick of 30 threads about your guns and your killings and your stupidity, that we’re dragging your sorry arses back to what it’s really about.
    Banning guns."


    shav:
    "Uh no.
    The title, the OP, 1 student... your posts... they’re all aimed at diverting attention away from where it needs to be.
    Why are you not banning guns?"


    shav:
    "I don't think you should have guns in the house." (AKA a ban)

    shav:
    "I don't think you should be carrying any weapon in public" (AKA a ban)

    https://www.facebook.com/abcnews.au/videos/10157789312624988/

    shavs minime:
    24 Feb '18 01:35 "Don't be silly"(sic)

    A short lesson for shav, repeat this before hitting the post button:

    Mean what you say, say what you mean.
  4. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    24 Feb '18 08:10
    Originally posted by @wajoma
    shav:
    "I am not blind.
    The whole thread is about deflecting.
    And we’re so sick of 30 threads about your guns and your killings and your stupidity, that we’re dragging your sorry arses back to what it’s really about.
    Banning guns."


    shav:
    [i]"Uh no.
    The title, the OP, 1 student... your posts... they’re all aimed at diverting attention away ...[text shortened]... hav, repeat this before hitting the post button:

    [b]Mean what you say, say what you mean.
    [/b]
    FACT: the percentage of people killed or injured with guns when guns are in the house far outstrips the percentage of people killed or injured in the general population.

    But hey, the sacred NRA says we need guns so who gives a shyte how many people get killed by them, right?

    I didn't see you answer the question of exactly why we need 100 round a minute rifles to hunt rabbits and deer.

    The sacred NRA LOVES bumper guns and will send hundreds of millions of dollars to those hypocritical congressmen who fall over and play dead to their tune.

    That MUST be ok since the NRA is the state religion.
  5. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87834
    24 Feb '18 09:15
    Originally posted by @whodey
    This is for all the lefties out there.

    How should we go about banning guns? Should we go to the trouble of repealing the 2nd amendment or just reinterpret it, or just ignore it?
    Normally, when looking at solving problems, one looks at the cause of the problem. And then via Plan-Do-Check-Act one solves the cause.

    So, after studying the situation, I’ve come to the conclusion that we don’t need to ban guns.

    We should just execute every single gun nut, NRA supporter and Republican.
    For good measure: whining millenials as well.
  6. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    24 Feb '18 10:02
    Originally posted by @whodey
    This is for all the lefties out there.

    How should we go about banning guns? Should we go to the trouble of repealing the 2nd amendment or just reinterpret it, or just ignore it?
    The Second Amendment protects the right of Americans to organize into armed militias. That right was effectively abolished a long time ago.
  7. Joined
    24 Apr '10
    Moves
    15242
    24 Feb '18 10:551 edit
    Originally posted by @wajoma
    I can think of two right here at the debates board who have been honest enough to state their true intention i.e. ban guns:

    shav and gkr
    I have provided a link explaining how people could still be playing with guns, looking at them, greasing them, stroking them, maybe giving them a courtesy lick. Even in my country.

    I assume you read it?

    Also, I asked you a (actually 2) question over in the "Madness" thread.
  8. SubscriberWajoma
    Die Cheeseburger
    Provocation
    Joined
    01 Sep '04
    Moves
    77986
    24 Feb '18 11:021 edit
    Originally posted by @great-king-rat
    I have provided a link explaining how people could still be playing with guns, looking at them, greasing them, stroking them, maybe giving them a courtesy lick. Even in my country.

    I assume you read it?

    Also, I asked you a (actually 2) question over in the "Madness" thread.
    gkr:

    "I agree... with Shav. You should focus on getting rid of guns."

    gkr:

    "Good point.

    The thread title is "How the f#ck are we going to stop this epidemic of mass shootings??"

    The partial answer is: "Get rid of all your goddamn guns!""


    That was just in the last few gkr posts.
  9. Joined
    24 Apr '10
    Moves
    15242
    24 Feb '18 11:03
    Originally posted by @wajoma
    gkr:

    "I agree... with Shav. You should focus on getting rid of guns."

    gkr:

    "Good point.

    The thread title is "How the f#ck are we going to stop this epidemic of mass shootings??"

    The partial answer is: "Get rid of all your goddamn guns!""


    That was just in the last few gkr posts.
    "I have provided a link explaining how people could still be playing with guns, looking at them, greasing them, stroking them, maybe giving them a courtesy lick. Even in my country.

    I assume you read it?"
  10. Joined
    24 Apr '10
    Moves
    15242
    24 Feb '18 11:05
    Would you like to adress the topic of gun control, Wujumu, or do you just want to focus on irrelevant sidestuff for a while?
  11. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    116779
    24 Feb '18 11:07
    Originally posted by @whodey
    This is for all the lefties out there.

    How should we go about banning guns? Should we go to the trouble of repealing the 2nd amendment or just reinterpret it, or just ignore it?
    Are you really so mentally incapacitated that you cannot even make the first cognitive step in this process?

    Besides, why do you presume that only “lefties” care about this issue?
  12. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    24 Feb '18 11:07
    Originally posted by @great-king-rat
    Would you like to adress the topic of gun control, Wujumu, or do you just want to focus on irrelevant sidestuff for a while?
    Short attention span. Possibly childhood trauma or just a dumbass.
  13. Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    116779
    24 Feb '18 11:09
    Originally posted by @wajoma
    gkr:

    "I agree... with Shav. You should focus on getting rid of guns."

    gkr:

    "Good point.

    The thread title is "How the f#ck are we going to stop this epidemic of mass shootings??"

    The partial answer is: "Get rid of all your goddamn guns!""


    That was just in the last few gkr posts.
    If there were virtually no guns distributed within your crazy population, how many mass killings, or single killings with guns do you think there would be?
  14. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87834
    24 Feb '18 11:431 edit
    Originally posted by @wajoma
    shav:
    "I am not blind.
    The whole thread is about deflecting.
    And we’re so sick of 30 threads about your guns and your killings and your stupidity, that we’re dragging your sorry arses back to what it’s really about.
    Banning guns."


    shav:
    [i]"Uh no.
    The title, the OP, 1 student... your posts... they’re all aimed at diverting attention away ...[text shortened]... hav, repeat this before hitting the post button:

    [b]Mean what you say, say what you mean.
    [/b]
    Not exactly sure what your point is there, honey.

    I don’t believe in banning cars, but I do think cars should be banned from inner-city shopping districts.

    Likewise. I don’t think guns need to be completely banned.
    Morons like you should be banned from touching them and guns should be permitted in certain areas (like parks where rangers roam and shooting ranges).

    So, again, not exactly sure what you’re getting at.
    And everyone of my points you quote I agree with.

    So, uh, yeah... carry on!
    Feel to quote more of my posts; it’s good for my ego.
  15. SubscriberWajoma
    Die Cheeseburger
    Provocation
    Joined
    01 Sep '04
    Moves
    77986
    24 Feb '18 11:44
    Originally posted by @divegeester
    If there were virtually no guns distributed within your crazy population, how many mass killings, or single killings with guns do you think there would be?
    Whose population? I'm a Kiwi living in Aus

    https://www.facebook.com/abcnews.au/videos/10157789312624988/
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree