@zahlanzi said
if you were on the side of life, then you wouldn't have immediately jumped to scream unconstitutional when i mentioned vasectomies for all, a procedure way less risky than forcing women to carry pregnancies that are always risky even when wanted and everything is done just right.
If you were on the side of life you would be against death penalty. You would want gun contro ...[text shortened]... ld want free healthcare.
You aren't on the side of life, you hypocrite.You want to control women.
You are saying the govt should force vasectomies, ( we are speaking theoretically of course). You temper that statement somewhat by mentioning forcing women..., in the same sentence.
I take issue with comparing the two, in that the first one is absolute, govt physically acts. There could be ramification for failing to comply, n'est -ce pas?
One does not 'force' a woman to carry a baby, she does it herself. Her choice, to have and carry a child.. You suggest that a vasectomy be mandatory. One govt mandatory, one not. Whew.
I do not want to control women, I 'want' them to be responsible for themselves.. .....their choice.
I do not believe In gun control, because I would not be able to protect my children. I do not believe in govt- paid much of anything, you will note that the USA is already up to its ears in health care. Remember. ....if the govt pays for something, they have to get the money somewhere.
Responsible people already have it, they do not need govt assistance.. The 40M desparate who don't...... we should cover them.
People who want paid maternity should negotiate a job that offers that. Are you for real? What has the government got to do with that?
Now, where were we? Do you take exceptions to my comments, how so?