@sonhouse saidPlease you fellers settle down. Next you’ll rave on about Trump, or Rudy, or even me,AvJoe.
@AverageJoe1
Rudy called for 'investigations'' also but now 59 to zero in favor of the country, Rudy and his idiotic buddies lost them ALL so you want to keep the BS going by thinking you have something in bogus calls for investigation as if that woman has something on Biden nobody else has.
You are a pathetic loser conspiracy theorist.
But all you have in this thread is....Why is this call made to investigate Hunter Biden? It ain’t that hard. What has he done to warrant an investigation??????
It ain’t that hard. Whew. You are an angry bunch. Did you disable the natural gas lines in Aspen to freeze people?
@AverageJoe1
What has he done to warrant an investigation.
Well I am SURE you think it is because Biden Jr is a criminal.
So all you need is some ultrarightwingnut representative to 'call' for investigation with no evidence, good enough for you to say 'off with his head'
The ONLY reason Hunter is under any kind of scrutiny is because he is Joe's son.
If he was the son of ANYONE else, like say, the son of TRUMP there would be no issues with whatever he did, crim or not.
The whole idea is to try to smear Joe.
Of course it is doomed to failure because there was nothing criminal with Hunter.
Which has been gone over a dozen times but hey, one URWN rep says lets investigate, you jump on that like a dog on a bone.
Since that rep called for investigation, he MUST be guilty,
In YOUR mind anyway. The adults in the room wait for evidence and a trial and if convicted THEN you can roll out the champagne.
@sonhouse saidYou say nothing about what he has done to warrant an investigation.
@AverageJoe1
What has he done to warrant an investigation.
Well I am SURE you think it is because Biden Jr is a criminal.
So all you need is some ultrarightwingnut representative to 'call' for investigation with no evidence, good enough for you to say 'off with his head'
The ONLY reason Hunter is under any kind of scrutiny is because he is Joe's son.
If he was t ...[text shortened]... ults in the room wait for evidence and a trial and if convicted THEN you can roll out the champagne.
Then, you say that ‘there is nothing criminal with Hunter. ‘. Wow. Who knew.....I guess you know? Tell us more.
Then, after saying there is nothing criminal, you say ‘adults in the room wait for evidence and a trial”. You see how difficult you and Handy make the Forum??? Sonhouse, you say there is nothing criminal, and then say adults (notyou) will have to wait for a trial. You don’t?
Note, again, you just don’t get an issue,.... it is ‘why an investigation ?” Your answer above says “(you are sure) that I think that Biden Jr is a criminal.” Sonhouse, what I think has nothing to do with the issue. Whew. My, you do get worked up.
@averagejoe1 saidJoe, if your old debate coach were here, he/she would unceremoniously kick you off the team. Your thought process is hopelessly impaired.
You say nothing about what he has done to warrant an investigation.
Then, you say that ‘there is nothing criminal with Hunter. ‘. Wow. Who knew.....I guess you know? Tell us more.
Then, after saying there is nothing criminal, you say ‘adults in the room wait for evidence and a trial”. You see how difficult you and Handy make the Forum??? Sonhouse, you say there is no ...[text shortened]... al.” Sonhouse, what I think has nothing to do with the issue. Whew. My, you do get worked up.
@handyandy saidBut but, no one has answered the question. What has ‘my’thought orocess got to do with it? Are you and Handy/ roommates?
Joe, if your old debate coach were here, he/she would unceremoniously kick you off the team. Your thought process is hopelessly impaired.
@averagejoe1 saidProbably nothing.
But what would be (or will be) the basis of the complaint? It would not just say some random thing about Giulliani. I mean specifics aboit Hunter himself.
@athousandyoung saidIt is a given that conservative posters score many more points then do liberal posters on this forum. Take this simple thread. Not one answer, cogent or non-cogent. Pitiful. One single-layered question.
Probably nothing.
I think the next time that you post a question, I will say “you are crazy”. You are this,, you are that!”
2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidRight here you go Joe in terms that at least the average intellect can decipher, what is your question exactly.
It is a given that conservative posters score many more points then do liberal posters on this forum. Take this simple thread. Not one answer, cogent or non-cogent. Pitiful. One single-layered question.
I think the next time that you post a question, I will say “you are crazy”. You are this,, you are that!”
Please do not bury the question in a kaleidoscope of colloquialisms or general judgemental statements about us fellers.
@averagejoe1 saidYour "layered question" is nonsense. Therefore, no cogent answer.
It is a given that conservative posters score many more points then do liberal posters on this forum. Take this simple thread. Not one answer, cogent or non-cogent. Pitiful. One single-layered question.
I think the next time that you post a question, I will say “you are crazy”. You are this,, you are that!”
Points scored by conservative posters are spurious, at best.
@averagejoe1 saidWhy would you do that? I’m not responding to you like that. Unless you can answer your own question I am probably right. This is simply harassment for partisan purposes with no actual content.
It is a given that conservative posters score many more points then do liberal posters on this forum. Take this simple thread. Not one answer, cogent or non-cogent. Pitiful. One single-layered question.
I think the next time that you post a question, I will say “you are crazy”. You are this,, you are that!”
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidThey usually just come back with a different question or claim, or nit-pick and quibble, arguing over some irrelevant minutia in a conservative's statement.
It is a given that conservative posters score many more points then do liberal posters on this forum. Take this simple thread. Not one answer, cogent or non-cogent. Pitiful. One single-layered question.
I think the next time that you post a question, I will say “you are crazy”. You are this,, you are that!”
"Ha-haaaa! You said China's population was four and a half times larger than the USA's, but in fact it is only 4.3 times larger, so everything you say is like, totally wrong and stuff!"
@dood111 saidAnd they claim (pretend) that they don’t understand the question. What has Hunter done that would call for an investigation? Kev says the question is “buried in a kaleidoscope of colloquiums “. or somesuch. What? It is a Single layer, question, no multi layers. One question. An answer could be that he was caught jaywalking.
They usually just come back with a different question or claim, or nit-pick and quibble, arguing over some irrelevant minutia in a conservative's statement.
"Ha-haaaa! You said China's population was four and a half times larger than the USA's, but in fact it is only 4.3 times larger, so everything you say is like, totally wrong and stuff!"
Why do libs not answer questions. OK. Here is a multi kaleidoscope for Kev. What is the problem with Joe Biden?
😕🤓😝😫😏😃☺️😋🚤🛬🚥⛵️🍭🥨⛄️⛄️🐌😉🤨😛😫
@averagejoe1 saidBecause you either don’t actually ask a question and if you do manage one it’s a non sensical rhetorical one.
And they claim (pretend) that they don’t understand the question. What has Hunter done that would call for an investigation? Kev says the question is “buried in a kaleidoscope of colloquiums “. or somesuch. What? It is a Single layer, question, no multi layers. One question. An answer could be that he was caught jaywalking.
Why do libs not answer questions. ...[text shortened]... re is a multi kaleidoscope for Kev. What is the problem with Joe Biden?
😕🤓😝😫😏😃☺️😋🚤🛬🚥⛵️🍭🥨⛄️⛄️🐌😉🤨😛😫
Next question Joe
@kevcvs57 saidOK, How bout this. Has Hunter done anything factual, and proven, like smelly foregn relations with China, the number one enemy of the US, whch would warrant an investigation, given the fact that he is the son of our vice president, which could be very very very compromising?
Because you either don’t actually ask a question and if you do manage one it’s a non sensical rhetorical one.
Next question Joe
Handy, Sonhouse, yall can take five. Or, as Shav might say “you lot can take five”. And yall kid me for saying yall??? Shav says “You lot.” Im not kidding. Who says you lot? Sorry , got off the issue, but then y’all are used to that😃😃😃🤔🤔