@averagejoe1 saidNo.
OK, How bout this. Has Hunter done anything factual, and proven, like smelly foregn relations with China, the number one enemy of the US, whch would warrant an investigation, given the fact that he is the son of our vice president, which could be very very very compromising?
Handy, Sonhouse, yall can take five. Or, as Shav might say “you lot can take five”. And ...[text shortened]... ” Im not kidding. Who says you lot? Sorry , got off the issue, but then y’all are used to that😃😃😃🤔🤔
@AThousandYoung
AJ DESPERATLY wishes for Hunter to go down to cast aspersions on daddy, POTUS to be.
Unless Ted Cruz and his 11 buddies rip the democracy apart and install the corruptor in chief Trump in a coup.
Don't think that will happen but I am worried about Jan 5 and 6 with Trump ordering the Proud boys to attack protesters and such, he figures the more dead the better for him.
If that happens I hope Trump is charged with inciting riot besides the tax problems coming out of Manhattan where he gets pardon by himself or Pence by Trump resigning on Jan 19, Pence is POTUS for a day and HE pardons Trump.
Doesn't help State charges at all.
And there are tax fraud investigations going on and the investigators will have a ball when they actually get the 6 or so years of returns promised.
Then there is the millions missing from the inauguration 100 + million dollar fund.
And the payments to those porn stars, they will see if he tried to take deductions over that.
Which would be somewhat illegal.
@sonhouse saidNostradamus has returned!!!!!!
@AThousandYoung
AJ DESPERATLY wishes for Hunter to go down to cast aspersions on daddy, POTUS to be.
Unless Ted Cruz and his 11 buddies rip the democracy apart and install the corruptor in chief Trump in a coup.
Don't think that will happen but I am worried about Jan 5 and 6 with Trump ordering the Proud boys to attack protesters and such, he figures the more dead the ...[text shortened]... orn stars, they will see if he tried to take deductions over that.
Which would be somewhat illegal.
@athousandyoung saidOK, I will pencil you in as a ‘No’. Not an answer, but thanks for a liberal effort. BTW have you seen Sonouse’s posts? We prob should send somebody over there?
No.
@averagejoe1 said"Factual, and proven"? Get real, Joe.
OK, How bout this. Has Hunter done anything factual, and proven, like smelly foregn relations with China, the number one enemy of the US, whch would warrant an investigation, given the fact that he is the son of our vice president, which could be very very very compromising?
There's no evidence that Hunter Biden broke the law, much less any evidence that his father has done so.
If you're looking for wrongdoing, check the Trump family.
2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidHow is that not an answer?! You asked a yes/no question!
OK, I will pencil you in as a ‘No’. Not an answer, but thanks for a liberal effort. BTW have you seen Sonouse’s posts? We prob should send somebody over there?
Has Hunter done anything factual, and proven, like smelly foregn relations with China, the number one enemy of the US, whch would warrant an investigation, given the fact that he is the son of our vice president, which could be very very very compromising?
BTW, amusingly, the above was written by the same guy who criticized others' speech habits as not being 'good' English or 'proper':
It might be fun to start a thread on the differences in the dialects. One I noticed big time is that no one says ‘uh huh’ anymore. They say ‘I am.’ Or ‘I did’. Or, they will say “are you coming, or No?’” (That is not even good English. Proper would be the word ‘Not’,
@handyandy saidAndy? Factual would be riding on his dads (our plane) plane to China, Making the billion dollar deal,, being hired in Ukraine under unusual circumstances, knowing nothing about the oil business. Surely you follow me here. All factual, proven.
"Factual, and proven"? Get real, Joe.
There's no evidence that Hunter Biden broke the law, much less any evidence that his father has done so.
If you're looking for wrongdoing, check the Trump family.
Why did someone above say something ugly about my grammar? Don’t see it.
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidSee there you go in your first sentence you’ve asked
OK, How bout this. Has Hunter done anything factual, and proven, like smelly foregn relations with China, the number one enemy of the US, whch would warrant an investigation, given the fact that he is the son of our vice president, which could be very very very compromising?
Handy, Sonhouse, yall can take five. Or, as Shav might say “you lot can take five”. And ...[text shortened]... ” Im not kidding. Who says you lot? Sorry , got off the issue, but then y’all are used to that😃😃😃🤔🤔
“ Has Hunter done anything factual, and proven, like smelly foregn relations with China,”
What does that even mean? Are you accusing Hunter of doing what the vast majority of US entrepreneurs and investment bankers are doing? Or are you actually going to provide evidence that he’s done something illegal in his dealings with China based businesses.
When you say “smelly” is that what most people would describe as ‘fishy’ .
To your current rhetorical question I would say yes he has had business dealings with China based businesses but as I’ve pointed out so have the a horde of businesses in the US. So what is the point of your question. Are you saying that the children of Vice Presidents and Presidents should only work in McDs or knit woolly socks for your boys in Korea?
What are you actually getting at? Come on feller ‘spit it out’ ‘let the hounds see the hare’
@kevcvs57 saidI am trying to make liberals admit that there is a scintilla of facts about this monger which make him investigate-able. You almost do that above, but then you come up short by saying that other people do it too, thus saying it is OK. But you see, it is not OK, as he has compromised his father in his ventures according to some people higher up in the government, that know more than you and I do. By compromising his father, he compromises 330, million of us with those Chinamen.
See there you go in your first sentence you’ve asked
“ Has Hunter done anything factual, and proven, like smelly foregn relations with China,”
What does that even mean? Are you accusing Hunter of doing what the vast majority of US entrepreneurs and investment bankers are doing? Or are you actually going to provide evidence that he’s done something illegal in his dealings ...[text shortened]... rea?
What are you actually getting at? Come on feller ‘spit it out’ ‘let the hounds see the hare’
And I did not even mention the laptop. Why? Because that is not as provable and as factual ( yet ) as all the other items I mentioned above.
My points? You fellers defend what this person is ‘up to’. You know, y’all do not like rich people very much, but Hunter is very very rich,… How in the world do you think he got so rich? I think he is richer than anyone on this forum.
I appreciate your well-worded post, and I hope this answers it. True, I apparently did not make it easy to see what I was fishing for. And I did catch the proverbial fish, that everyone above defends Hunter Biden, by not denouncing him. I just don’t think that is very cool.
The old ‘everyone does it’ gambit?? Suzianne would not find THAT cool.😄
2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidBut you still haven’t explained what he’s “up to” in your mind and if you want an adult debate don’t use phrases like ‘Chinamen’ and clearly China is not the No1 enemy of the US as it’s main existential enemy lives within it own borders.
I am trying to make liberals admit that there is a scintilla of facts about this monger which make him investigate-able. You almost do that above, but then you come up short by saying that other people do it too, thus saying it is OK. But you see, it is not OK, as he has compromised his father in his ventures according to some people higher up in the government, that know ...[text shortened]... ink that is very cool.
The old ‘everyone does it’ gambit?? Suzianne would not find THAT cool.😄
I don’t like whataboutism but the main reason that no one is taking this Hunter hunt seriously is due to the fact that we’ve had the Trump kids running Trump inc whilst having official access to the White House including security clearance and official roles, I mean how are we supposed to see this handwringing about hunter as anything more than half assed attempt to sling mud at the president elect whilst pretending not to see the arch corruption of your personal saviour in the White House.
And it’s a fact that this so called enemy No1 is your biggest trading partner by a mile even after 4 years of Trumps phoney trade war.
So come on Joe, a serious question please, and you’ll get a serious answer.
@kevcvs57 saidBut you see, because you refuse to recognize his activities, your post is rendered a bit lacking in substance. So , it’s hard to respond to,
But you still haven’t explained what he’s “up to” in your mind and if you want an adult debate don’t use phrases like ‘Chinamen’ and clearly China is not the No1 enemy of the US as it’s main existential enemy lives within it own borders.
I don’t like whataboutism but the main reason that no one is taking this Hunter hunt seriously is due to the fact that we’ve had the Trump ...[text shortened]... rumps phoney trade war.
So come on Joe, a serious question please, and you’ll get a serious answer.
As to Trump’s kids, Can you tell us what they might be ‘involved in’ that would warrant an investigation? No one of either party seems to think they should be investigated. Can you tell us why they think Hunter might be subject to investigation? This is one really complicated thread!!!
@kevcvs57 saidNo, I don’t have ‘evidence’. His activities, according to govt officials, seem to warrant an investigation, whereupon evidence might THEN be discovered. Whew.
See there you go in your first sentence you’ve asked
“ Has Hunter done anything factual, and proven, like smelly foregn relations with China,”
What does that even mean? Are you accusing Hunter of doing what the vast majority of US entrepreneurs and investment bankers are doing? Or are you actually going to provide evidence that he’s done something illegal in his dealings ...[text shortened]... rea?
What are you actually getting at? Come on feller ‘spit it out’ ‘let the hounds see the hare’
This is one complicated thread!
@averagejoe1 saidSo you mean it's a witch hunt.
No, I don’t have ‘evidence’. His activities, according to govt officials, seem to warrant an investigation, whereupon evidence might THEN be discovered. Whew.
This is one complicated thread!
You certainly seem to want a fishing expedition.
@suzianne saidIn the witch hunts, there was no requirement of evidence. Only unbased belief. I assume that investigators in the Hunter saga will look for evidence. A bit different, dont you think.?”
So you mean it's a witch hunt.
You certainly seem to want a fishing expedition.
And, further, a fishing expedition is where one hopes to discover information. The panel investigating Hunter is looking for truth, but you cant say that they ‘hope’ to find it.
@averagejoe1 saidOne complicated thread ?? It's your thread, dumbo !!
No, I don’t have ‘evidence’. His activities, according to govt officials, seem to warrant an investigation, whereupon evidence might THEN be discovered. Whew.
This is one complicated thread!
One big nothingburger that has you spinning your wheels and going around in circles.
Sit down and take a load off. You're getting dizzy all by yourself !!