@no1marauder saidSo you use a case that failed to prove a case can win? 😂. Idiot
A new prosecutor decided to drop the case after the appellate court ruling.
But the ruling remains good law and it is based on more than 100 year old SCOTUS precedent.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI used a case that restates long established principles of law which refutes your ignorant claim.
So you use a case that failed to prove a case can win? 😂. Idiot
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIf they were obstructing ICE agents, why didn't Ross or the others arrest them?
His partner did
🙄
@no1marauder saidYou used a case that was thrown out!
I used a case that restates long established principles of law which refutes your ignorant claim.
You a hard headed MFer
@no1marauder saidBecause she tried to run and got killed…dayuuummm
If they were obstructing ICE agents, why didn't Ross or the others arrest them?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIt wasn't "thrown out", moron.
You used a case that was thrown out!
You a hard headed MFer
And the legal principle established by the SCOTUS remains in effect; States can prosecute Federal agents for violations of State law.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWhen did they say "You're under arrest?"
Because she tried to run and got killed…dayuuummm
They had plenty of opportunity to do so.
1 edit
@fornichessate saidYou're hilarious.
Regardless of the Feds.
States should be able to press charges.
States Rights
Confederate
GOP Fed lovers, unreal.
Maybe it's time to go over to the racist Democrats...
"I didn't think there was anybody this F'n dumb in the whole world." -- Tom Segura
@no1marauder saidNo it wasn’t…scotus didn’t hear that case
It wasn't "thrown out", moron.
And the legal principle established by the SCOTUS remains in effect; States can prosecute Federal agents for violations of State law.
You lie again