@Mott-The-Hoople saidNope, you specifically responded to my question about how a Minnesota jury would respond by claiming Minnesota didn't have jurisdiction. And you didn't use the word "lawfully" either. And you even claimed Minnesota prosecutors couldn't file charges without first getting permission from a federal judge which is completely incorrect.
Show me where any state has a right to punish a fed officer for lawfully performing his duty.
You cant…and that is what my first post stated.
Sure, Ross will claim he was just "performing his duty" but Minnesota doesn't have to buy that.
2 edits
@Mott-The-Hoople saidno1: How do you think it's going to play to a Minnesota jury?
Show me where any state has a right to punish a fed officer for lawfully performing his duty.
You cant…and that is what my first post stated.
Mott: It wont play at all…Mn doesnt have jurisdiction to charge the fed officer for performing his duty.
Mott: a fed judge will rule in any case before it is allowed on a state level.
states cant just up and bring charges
2 edits
@no1marauder said“no1: How do you think it's going to play to a Minnesota jury? “
no1: How do you think it's going to play to a Minnesota jury?
Mott: It wont play at all…Mn doesnt have jurisdiction to charge the fed officer for performing his duty.
Mott: a fed judge will rule in any case before it is allowed on a state level.
states cant just up and bring charges
a fed judge has to approve it going to a state court. A fed judge will not approve a fed officer to be for lawfully performing his duty. Therefore no jury
“Mott: It wont play at all…Mn doesnt have jurisdiction to charge the fed officer for performing his duty.“
Fed judge will not allow a fed officer to be charged for lawfully performing his duty. As evidenced by no charges against officer Ross
“Mott: a fed judge will rule in any case before it is allowed on a state level.”
It would first go before a fed judge, who would not allow charges against a fed officer for performing his lawful duty. As can be evidenced by mn failing to charge officer Ross.
“states cant just up and bring charges”
Not against a fed officer for lawfully performing his duty.
Show me the mn charges against officer Ross.
When you get a chance study up on the “supremacy clause”.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI've shown virtually every one of these statements is legally incorrect. Why you keep repeating such obviously false statements is a mystery.
“no1: How do you think it's going to play to a Minnesota jury? “
a fed judge has to approve it going to a state court. A fed judge will not approve a fed officer to be for lawfully performing his duty. Therefore no jury
“Mott: It wont play at all…Mn doesnt have jurisdiction to charge the fed officer for performing his duty.“
Fed judge will not allow ...[text shortened]... he mn charges against officer Ross.
When you get a chance study up on the “supremacy clause”.
Minnesota authorities are still investigating and gathering evidence. If and when they decide to file charges, they won't need to go to a Federal judge like you keep stupidly insisting.
@shavixmir saidPlease man , stalking should be beneath you
I just love these threads when trailer trash keep claiming somthing and the professional keeps shooting them down like helicopters in Afghanistan.