@Cliff-Mashburn saidNo they would not. That is sick, demented and completely implausible.
The protesters would all be celebrating his death.
Remember that.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidYou're f'in insane if you think she was trying tonrun him over. I've seen more forceful driving from a Walmart shopping cart.
Here's the scene from a different angle at the 32 second mark.
Sure looks like she was trying to run him over to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS3caI3di8c
Don't want to get shot? Then don't try to run over people.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidYou have a ridiculous, moronic habit of calling people liars and then pretty much admitting they are telling the truth.
one shot from the front, one from the side...quit your lying.
this woman was committing a felony when she was shot
your analogy is laughable
The ICE agent fired at least three times, twice "from the side" which means the car was already past him just like I said. Furthermore, he clearly violated Federal guidelines by not simply moving out of the way rather than using deadly force as a first resort:
"Justice Department policy says officers cannot fire at a moving vehicle unless there’s “no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.”
ICE’s parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, says firing at a driver is “prohibited” unless there’s a “reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury,” according to a use-of-force policy from 2023."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/was-ice-agent-s-use-of-force-reckless-experts-analyze-minneapolis-shooting/ar-AA1TPW2K?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=3411e6c03b394593c10935ea4db215bb&ei=4
Even if the driver was committing a felony as you claim, that in and of itself does not justify deadly force as the DHS policy makes clear.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidMaybe he should have flashed his badge.
Oh…just assaulting a little bit is ok?
😂
@AverageJoe1 saidNo he wouldn't, obviously.
No it is not. I hate it for you, cause if it were, he would removed from office.
Geez
Congress has no spine.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidThe sargeant-at-arms was doing his job of protecting lawmakers.
OMG suzy did someone log on to your page here? I would have never thought you'd support what the agent did.
Good for you for seeing the sense of what happened.
From the insurrectionists.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidWait, did you think I was talking about the ICE murderer?
OMG suzy did someone log on to your page here? I would have never thought you'd support what the agent did.
Good for you for seeing the sense of what happened.
No, I was talking about Ashli Babbitt.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIdiot.
You cant just lie. The vehicle struck the officer, the shot entered the windshield, you know, the FRONT of the vehicle.
Why are you lying and misrepresenting what happened?
In what scenario are you allowed to hit a police officer with your vehicle?
Oh, I know, that is specific with the liberal world…y’all don’t have to deal with facts.
Ice was there to arr ...[text shortened]... does walz get arrested for insurrection for threatened our ice officers with the man national guard?
@AverageJoe1 saidWhy don't you just fund the Border Patrol instead of soaking billions into ICE, who is very busy right now interviewing Proud Boys and Oath Keepers as ICE agents?
Don’t we need them to get rid of the illegal aliens in our country? Or are you saying that you do not want us to get rid of the illegal aliens in our country? You will not answer this question.
@AverageJoe1 saidRIght, GEEZ. The FACT JACK that Trump OWNS congress means FKING NOTHING to you Get serious, you are in fact just another troll working for Trump and will say anything, do anything to keep your POS lord in office and BTW I predicted there would be no REAL Epstein files released and I was right, that bunch of BS ALREADY IN domain around the world was just that BS and distraction, the real files will NEVER be released and I a was ONE HUNDRED PERCENT RIGHT ABOUT THAT BUT OF COURSE YOU WOULD JUST MOVE THE GOALPOSTS.
No it is not. I hate it for you, cause if it were, he would removed from office.
Geez
@Ponderable saidNot at all cynical. Remember how you cheered Charlie Kirk's death?
That is cynical at the very least.
If she would have wanted to run over him she would not have slowlwy steered but accelerated fast without steering.
I do hope that a independend investigatuion takes place.