Go back
If the AIDs don't get'cha...

If the AIDs don't get'cha...

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
Every now and then we see stories in the press about gays still having unprotected sex, or the number of gays having unprotected sex increasing again.
Kind of like young heterosexuals, only more sensationalized? American media is retarded.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Homosexuals who survive HIV/AIDS are at greater risk for arthritis, hearing and vision loss, depression, heart disease, bowel cancer, rectal cancer, insulin resistance, higher cholesterol and triglyceride levels, bone disease, hip replacement, Parkinson's disease which causes tremors and memory loss, pneumonia and liver and kidney disease.
Heterosexuals, by contrast, live pain-free, normal lives.

Do you think that older people suffering from these things would rather die before deteriorating?

Nemesio

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
Heterosexuals, by contrast, live pain-free, normal lives.

Do you think that older people suffering from these things would rather die before deteriorating?

Nemesio
The point you and the apologists missed is that by engaging in buggery, homosexuals can not only get HIV/AIDs, but contract a whole host of age-related maladies all at the same time 10 to 20 years earlier than normal. Which just goes to show you that being "gay" is not as glamorous or fab as the media portray it to be.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
The point you and the apologists missed is that by engaging in buggery, homosexuals can not only get HIV/AIDs, but contract a whole host of age-related maladies all at the same time 10 to 20 years earlier than normal. Which just goes to show you that being "gay" is not as glamorous or fab as the media portray it to be.
I don't think the media portrays being gay as "fab". You, being a closeted homosexual, may just be percieving it that way.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
The point you and the apologists missed is that by engaging in buggery, homosexuals can not only get HIV/AIDs, but contract a whole host of age-related maladies all at the same time 10 to 20 years earlier than normal. Which just goes to show you that being "gay" is not as glamorous or fab as the media portray it to be.
That was your point? 🙄

Do you believe homosexuality is a choice for most people? Do you view the majority of homosexuals as being promiscuous pleasure seekers having unprotected sex with multiple partners or as monogamous couples practicing safe sex?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
That was your point? 🙄

Do you believe homosexuality is a choice for most people? Do you view the majority of homosexuals as being promiscuous pleasure seekers having unprotected sex with multiple partners or as monogamous couples practicing safe sex?
No. It's a disease.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bogle
No. It's a disease.
please support your argument with scientific data...enlighten us🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by duecer
please support your argument with scientific data...enlighten us🙄
Predicted response:

"Who needs data?! They're QUEER! FILTHY!"

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by duecer
please support your argument with scientific data...enlighten us🙄
To put it bluntly, the bum was not designed to be a substitute vagina.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bogle
To put it bluntly, the bum was not designed to be a substitute vagina.
that's your reason for calling it a disease? you ignorant fool.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bogle
To put it bluntly, the bum was not designed to be a substitute vagina.
Do you find people who participate in oral sex to be diseased as well?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bogle
To put it bluntly, the bum was not designed to be a substitute vagina.
Well no. But I mean, it's not like gays are actually looking for a substitute vagina, is it?

And you do know that heterosexuals have anal sex as well, don't you?
And oral sex?

Say... are you from Alabama?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
The point you and the apologists missed is that by engaging in buggery, homosexuals can not only get HIV/AIDs, but contract a whole host of age-related maladies all at the same time 10 to 20 years earlier than normal. Which just goes to show you that being "gay" is not as glamorous or fab as the media portray it to be.
Are you being intentionally dense?

Why would HOMOsexuals with AIDS suffer unduly but HETEROsexuals not?

Or are you continuing to be a misinformed person thinking AIDS is a 'gay disease?' In the US,
gay men only constitute 42% of new HIV infections; 30% of new infections are of women,
and three quarters of those are through heterosexual contact. Yes, anal sex is a riskier
behavior; if you don't like anal sex, don't have it!

And, what difference does it make when a person suffers age-related maladies (except to the
person in question)? If an individual suffers from arthritis at 80, 60 or 30, what difference does
that make to anyone except the sufferer?

Nemesio

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bogle
To put it bluntly, the bum was not designed to be a substitute vagina.
Luddite.