Originally posted by der schwarze RitterHeterosexuals, by contrast, live pain-free, normal lives.
Homosexuals who survive HIV/AIDS are at greater risk for arthritis, hearing and vision loss, depression, heart disease, bowel cancer, rectal cancer, insulin resistance, higher cholesterol and triglyceride levels, bone disease, hip replacement, Parkinson's disease which causes tremors and memory loss, pneumonia and liver and kidney disease.
Do you think that older people suffering from these things would rather die before deteriorating?
Nemesio
Originally posted by NemesioThe point you and the apologists missed is that by engaging in buggery, homosexuals can not only get HIV/AIDs, but contract a whole host of age-related maladies all at the same time 10 to 20 years earlier than normal. Which just goes to show you that being "gay" is not as glamorous or fab as the media portray it to be.
Heterosexuals, by contrast, live pain-free, normal lives.
Do you think that older people suffering from these things would rather die before deteriorating?
Nemesio
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterI don't think the media portrays being gay as "fab". You, being a closeted homosexual, may just be percieving it that way.
The point you and the apologists missed is that by engaging in buggery, homosexuals can not only get HIV/AIDs, but contract a whole host of age-related maladies all at the same time 10 to 20 years earlier than normal. Which just goes to show you that being "gay" is not as glamorous or fab as the media portray it to be.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterThat was your point? 🙄
The point you and the apologists missed is that by engaging in buggery, homosexuals can not only get HIV/AIDs, but contract a whole host of age-related maladies all at the same time 10 to 20 years earlier than normal. Which just goes to show you that being "gay" is not as glamorous or fab as the media portray it to be.
Do you believe homosexuality is a choice for most people? Do you view the majority of homosexuals as being promiscuous pleasure seekers having unprotected sex with multiple partners or as monogamous couples practicing safe sex?
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterAre you being intentionally dense?
The point you and the apologists missed is that by engaging in buggery, homosexuals can not only get HIV/AIDs, but contract a whole host of age-related maladies all at the same time 10 to 20 years earlier than normal. Which just goes to show you that being "gay" is not as glamorous or fab as the media portray it to be.
Why would HOMOsexuals with AIDS suffer unduly but HETEROsexuals not?
Or are you continuing to be a misinformed person thinking AIDS is a 'gay disease?' In the US,
gay men only constitute 42% of new HIV infections; 30% of new infections are of women,
and three quarters of those are through heterosexual contact. Yes, anal sex is a riskier
behavior; if you don't like anal sex, don't have it!
And, what difference does it make when a person suffers age-related maladies (except to the
person in question)? If an individual suffers from arthritis at 80, 60 or 30, what difference does
that make to anyone except the sufferer?
Nemesio