@kevcvs57 saidI was going to make a joke about folders on the laptop that were titled "Definitely Not Porn" and then I see this...
Guliani and his co conspirators would’ve invented it dummy
The analysts found that people other than Hunter Biden had repeatedly accessed and copied data for nearly three years; they also found evidence that people other than Hunter Biden had accessed and written files to the drive, both before and after the New York Post story.[4] In September 2020, someone created six new folders on the drive, including with the names "Biden Burism", "Big Guy File", "Salacious Pics Package" and "Hunter. Burisma Documents".
I couldn't stop laughing when I read this in the wiki article. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controversy
Like really! The friends of the GOP have such a low regard for the intelligence of its target audience they can't see how ridiculous their claims have become.
@mott-the-hoople saidI do and seriously doubt it contains impeachable content.
LOL...no one doubts the laptop is real...doj said it was...and promptly seized it where nothing else could be found
When you lie and deny reality as often as the MAGA crowd and its cult leader it’s very hard to prove anything you claim to be the truth.
Why should anyone believe your telling the truth this time
@kmax87 saidI’m surprised they didn’t just keep the shell and place their own hard drive inside brimming with their favourite lies about Biden co written by the Kremlin and the CCP.
I was going to make a joke about folders on the laptop that were titled "Definitely Not Porn" and then I see this...
[quote]The analysts found that people other than Hunter Biden had repeatedly accessed and copied data for nearly three years; they also found evidence that people other than Hunter Biden had accessed and written files to the drive, both before and after the N ...[text shortened]... for the intelligence of its target audience they can't see how ridiculous their claims have become.
The MAGA crowd would have LAPped it up
@no1marauder saidat least one grandchild 😂
The Committee was very careful not to directly accuse President Biden of anything, weren't they?
Does Hunter Biden's "family" mean his entire family? Like his cousins? Or just the ones the Committee mentioned as receiving funds from foreign nationals?
1 edit
@no1marauder saidIn the context of this investigation, I 'think' that it must be those members who are on the grift. Certainly more than Hunter,, and if. you bring yourself to admit, like a man, that Biden has gotten at least One Dollar of the money from the ruskies and the chinee, then it would only follow that he is part of the 'family'.
The Committee was very careful not to directly accuse President Biden of anything, weren't they?
Does Hunter Biden's "family" mean his entire family? Like his cousins? Or just the ones the Committee mentioned as receiving funds from foreign nationals?
Or, How about anyone who has benefitted. That would Certainly include Joe.
@wildgrass saidProvocative? Why do you suggest that they even need to? The facts speak for themselves. You fellers just cant let go. ANd Shav accused me, of all people,, of having the hots for Hunter. You do.
Involved in a financial network could mean anything. They were trying to come up with a provocative statement that convinced their base that it wasn't all a waste of time and money.
@averagejoe1 saidRight you already wrote, that after you add up the investigations and book deals, the facts add up to nothing criminal. So these political committees need something to say.
Provocative? Why do you suggest that they even need to? The facts speak for themselves. You fellers just cant let go. ANd Shav accused me, of all people,, of having the hots for Hunter. You do.
@kmax87 saidThere is likely a copy (maybe made by the repairman) of the Laptop to confirm if it has ever been tampered with. IF that would confirm evidence (for either side) one way or another, would that not have surfaced? Maybe it has already been verified that there is not a copy with obvious tampering, so everyone is going with the one we all know about.
I was going to make a joke about folders on the laptop that were titled "Definitely Not Porn" and then I see this...
[quote]The analysts found that people other than Hunter Biden had repeatedly accessed and copied data for nearly three years; they also found evidence that people other than Hunter Biden had accessed and written files to the drive, both before and after the N ...[text shortened]... for the intelligence of its target audience they can't see how ridiculous their claims have become.
@averagejoe1 saidHow exactly did "Joe benefit"?
In the context of this investigation, I 'think' that it must be those members who are on the grift. Certainly more than Hunter,, and if. you bring yourself to admit, like a man, that Biden has gotten at least One Dollar of the money from the ruskies and the chinee, then it would only follow that he is part of the 'family'.
Or, How about anyone who has benefitted. That would Certainly include Joe.
Please be specific.
2 edits
@no1marauder saidtell us what the bidens did for the tens of millions?...please be specific
How exactly did "Joe benefit"?
Please be specific.
mainly the young grand daughter
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidUnless it directly relates to Joe Biden, it's NOMFB or your FB unless there is sufficient evidence of some illegal activity - "sufficient" being enough to likely convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
tell us what the bidens did for the tens of millions?...please be specific
mainly the young grand daughter
Got any of that?
BTW I'm not seeing any relevance to these granddaughter statements. Please elaborate.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidPatriarch of a family oversees money. It naturally follows that he is benefitted by the enrichment of his family by money flowing to his family, as a result of his influence and direction. Their getting this money keeps his money, which he normally would be parceling out to them, in His Pocket! I represent men with money who, if there were outside money flowing to family members,, by virtue of their direction thereof,.. would then be able to keep their own money. ......it would not be depleted by 'the needs of his family'.
How exactly did "Joe benefit"?
Please be specific.
I could be more specific as you ask, but then, you must be more specific with your question. ...although I covered that one pretty well. BTW, some the evidence (which you say does not exist) clearly proves Hunter was paying bills for Joe, so the dirty money was benefitting Joe.
You messin'with me, Maruader?
Whew. Hey ask me another question, I will answer it. Libs don't answer.
You are sounding like Suzianne.
@averagejoe1 saidYou're a couple of centuries out of date with this "patriarch" BS; it's pretty atypical in the 21st century US of A for daddy to have any control of their adult children's finances, nevermind his brother and more distant relatives.
Patriarch of a family oversees money. It naturally follows that he is benefitted by the enrichment of his family by money flowing to his family, as a result of his influence and direction. Their getting this money keeps his money, which he normally would be parceling out to them, in His Pocket! I represent men with money who, if there were outside money flowing to famil ...[text shortened]... y ask me another question, I will answer it. Libs don't answer.
You are sounding like Suzianne.
@no1marauder saidzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Unless it directly relates to Joe Biden, it's NOMFB or your FB unless there is sufficient evidence of some illegal activity - "sufficient" being enough to likely convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Got any of that?
BTW I'm not seeing any relevance to these granddaughter statements. Please elaborate.
We all know the status of affairs, these tiresome questions just do not get it in moving discussions along. No one has ever said the evidence has been uncovered yet. But we do say there is smoke (you know, the old 'where there is smoke there is fire' thingy.
Here is a question for you which you will not answer. Just writing stuff is not necessarliy an answer.
Do you think we could apply the proverb 'Where there is smoke there is fire' to the Biden situation?