If there is no difference between men and women...

If there is no difference between men and women, then what should be said of feminists?

Are they narrow minded bigots? Should we all be "personists" instead?

@whodey said
If there is no difference between men and women, then what should be said of feminists?

Are they narrow minded bigots? Should we all be "personists" instead?

Your 'given' is flawed.

Who said "there's no difference between men and women"? Don't be daft.

@suzianne said
Your 'given' is flawed.

Who said "there's no difference between men and women"? Don't be daft.

If anyone can identify as one, so they are one, what then makes them unique?

Note: I don't believe this is true, but in some arguments I've been in, this seems to
be the side of some.

@kellyjay said
If anyone can identify as one, so they are one, what then makes them unique?

Note: I don't believe this is true, but in some arguments I've been in, this seems to
be the side of some.

I still think you've got the wrong end of the stick on this.

It's not, like some appear to think, like a light switch you can flick back and forth on a whim.

@whodey said
If there is no difference between men and women, then what should be said of feminists?

Are they narrow minded bigots? Should we all be "personists" instead?

If there was no perceived difference, feminism wouldn’t be needed.

@whodey said
If there is no difference between men and women, then what should be said of feminists?

Are they narrow minded bigots? Should we all be "personists" instead?

You really are plumbing the Depths of Stupidity.

@kellyjay said
in some arguments I've been in, this seems to
be the side of some.

"seems to be" is rather different to "is".

When you don't understand a topic anything could "seem to be" anything else.