Go back
If we open a quarrel between past and present,,the future will be lost

If we open a quarrel between past and present,,the future will be lost

Debates

2 edits

Something to ponder , with all the stuff that is going on. An example, is tearing down the statues signifying the past. I am sure there are others. Go for it.


@averagejoe1 said
Something to ponder , with all the stuff that is going on. An example, is tearing down the statues signifying the past. I am sure there are others. Go for it.
"A nation losing its history is like an individual losing his memory"

I don't recall who said this, but it's a good analogy.
If you can imagine the problems someone with memory loss might have, then it's not hard to imagine what could happen to a nation if it 'forgets' its past


@averagejoe1 said
Something to ponder , with all the stuff that is going on. An example, is tearing down the statues signifying the past. I am sure there are others. Go for it.
A statute doesn't "signify the past".

Should Germany have left up all statutes of Hitler? Iraq of Saddam?


@lemon-lime said
"A nation losing its history is like an individual losing his memory"

I don't recall who said this, but it's a good analogy.
If you can imagine the problems someone with memory loss might have, then it's not hard to imagine what could happen to a nation if it 'forgets' its past
If the posters here are representative of right wing Americans, they don't know enough of this country's past to forget it.


@lemon-lime said
"A nation losing its history is like an individual losing his memory"
Luckily nobody is burning books.

2 edits


-Removed-
I probably would.
But contextualized. Add a statue of raped and dead bodies beside it or something.

I find it very difficult to find a painting or a statue offensice, no matter what the subject matter.


Agreed.
People are too sensitive these days.


@chesstachio said
Agreed.
People are too sensitive these days.
Probably because others are too dull to comprehend they’re boarish.


@no1marauder said
A statute doesn't "signify the past".

Should Germany have left up all statutes of Hitler? Iraq of Saddam?
I think Churchill said this. You are correct, we should tear down statues of despots, murderers et al.


If memory serves me, the Russians have taken down a statue of Stalin

1 edit

-Removed-
Read the OP again. Tearing down statues is only one example of attempts to erase the past.


@no1marauder said
A statute doesn't "signify the past".

Should Germany have left up all statutes of Hitler? Iraq of Saddam?
A statute doesn't "signify the past".
It can if it was a 'statute' enacted in the past.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@lemon-lime said
A statute doesn't "signify the past".
It can if it was a 'statute' enacted in the past.
OUCH. Dumb typo on my part.


@AverageJoe1
Presumably you are talking about removing statues and names from confederate state individuals.
It's not a matter of 'signifying' the past, in those cases it is GLORIFYING the past which just keeps racism smoldering.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.