14 Jun '18 21:02>
If anyone tells you they've read it, they are lying - it's 500 pages long. Nonetheless, I'm looking through the Executive Summary here https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
So far, it criticizes Comey for his public announcement of the decision to not charge HRC but concludes of that decision was justified (as almost all legal professionals have):
We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined
that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice. p. vii
It criticizes a number of FBI agents for making comments in their e-mails that were politically inadvisable but:
However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or
that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions
that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable. p.iii
Don't have time right now to go further (dart league night) but as far as I can tell this looks like another nothingburger in the grand scale of things.
So far, it criticizes Comey for his public announcement of the decision to not charge HRC but concludes of that decision was justified (as almost all legal professionals have):
We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined
that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice. p. vii
It criticizes a number of FBI agents for making comments in their e-mails that were politically inadvisable but:
However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or
that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions
that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable. p.iii
Don't have time right now to go further (dart league night) but as far as I can tell this looks like another nothingburger in the grand scale of things.