Originally posted by Jigtie
And the very concept of a world government denies people that "freedom"?
(Went back and read the original post.) Of course! You're thinking about the move towards
"collectivism" as being stupid. If the "world order" would be in favour of a so called "free market".
Would it still be stupid?
So tell us, do you take no issue with a one world government?
There are good aspects to various kinds of government as well as bad aspects. For example, the most efficient form of government is a dictatorship. Their is no middle men for checks and balances or to question what needs done. One person or persons give an order and you simply follow it, or else! There is no need to plead for Congressional support. There is not pandering to lobbyiest, interest groups, and voters. However, I'm sure you can see the down side to this form of government. History is ripe with its down falls. And so it goes with a one world government.
Woodrow Wilson, one of the fathers of progressivism in the US, was quoted as saying he detested the inefficiency of the three branches of government. I suppose he preferred the ruthless efficiency on no checks and balances. It is sad people such as himself have no wisdom in regards to human nature and the needs for checks in balances in everyones life, yours included. However, the Founding Fathers certainly did.