Being a "real" cynic... I have to wonder why "Senator Hilly" would condone a book by a dear lefty friend... by the same "house" that payed Billy millions.... errrr.... "under the very first 'Conservative' title"....
Ahem.
Come the next election... Who can attack a "three year old"
'Right Wing smear'? eerrrp. The author is Hillys good friend. errrrrp.
The really sad part is that our educational system has failed us to the degree that people will really think that this is a "right wing attack". so much for 'democracy' in all its glory. I tell you. Orwell and me have our work cut out against pseudo libs and Dems. But we'll do it. Because we must.
Besides me? The silly turd who recognizes evil?
My theory is "inoculation" of the stupid. One assesses ones weakness and then in collusion with friends publish a "terrible" book that lays out all the "terrible" facts. One "preps" the mindless media... Chris Matthews ... etc... to "point out" that this is what MoveOn has warned against.... ahemmmm.....
Then later you can blame the "Right wing conspiricy" for these things.
Never mind that the author is a long time friend. And that millions of dollars have passed hands with the "publisher".
Inoculation. "To make immune by injection of a spore."
So. Are the american people really stupid enough to be "inoculated"?
We'll see. It's that "values" thing. Ain't it? If it took svw 10 minutes of "conscious thought" to figure out... It will only take a year of two for the "average joe" to figure out.
Thank god a lot of "really important" people email me every day to thank me for my posts on RHP. Silly turds. They all "insist" on remaining anonymous. I wonder why that is? Hey. Bennet. If I can give you shit, I can sure give these turds a bit of grief.
Originally posted by AmauroteNot logical. If it destroys us, using centrifical force -- however that force might be brought into a political environment even as a metaphor -- the fact that we are then destroyed would prohibit any action. By definition one is "destroyed". The act of "making a claim" demands that one has an ability to do so. Can a non-object accomplish this?
Maybe if you extend your notional team to subsume Stang and Rush Limbaugh the centrifugal force of the paradox will destroy you all, enabling you to claim a default victory.
destroy vb, form of destruire, from (assumed) destrugere. 1 put out of existence by severe damage or attack. 2 completely ruin or spoil. 3 kill (an animal) by humane means.
But then, I'm just funnin' you. I know this is all WAY over your head.