Go back
Interesting Washington Post Article

Interesting Washington Post Article

Debates

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
08 Mar 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

The lead:

"Intelligence and diplomatic officials in the United States and Europe suspect that pro-Ukraine saboteurs may be responsible for explosions in September that severely damaged the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines, an attack that could erode support for Ukraine among the Western nations that have come to its defense against Russia."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/intelligence-officials-suspect-ukraine-partisans-behind-nord-stream-bombings-rattling-kyiv-s-allies/ar-AA18lbOV?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=3987fdbd2e284a8680686643fc25f31c&ei=28


As an aside, it mentions:

"Western officials say Ukrainian actors are responsible for a car explosion in August that killed the daughter of Alexander Dugin, a Russian nationalist and ideological ally of President Vladimir Putin. Some officials said that Dugin was the intended target and that Kyiv was admonished over the attack by its Western allies."

Way back last Summer, I mentioned this possibility and received the usual mindless attacks calling me "pro-Russia".

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/was-moscow-car-bomb-staged.194460/page-6

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
90166
Clock
08 Mar 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

Well, it didn’t make sense that Russia would be responsible for that anyway.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22695
Clock
08 Mar 23

@no1marauder said
The lead:

"Intelligence and diplomatic officials in the United States and Europe suspect that pro-Ukraine saboteurs may be responsible for explosions in September that severely damaged the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines, an attack that could erode support for Ukraine among the Western nations that have come to its defense against Russia."

https://www.msn.com/en-u ...[text shortened]... e "pro-Russia".

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/was-moscow-car-bomb-staged.194460/page-6
That sounds about right. Biden is a pro-Ukraine saboteur.
Biden openly saying he was going to do it isn't enough to convince you?

After falsely blaming Russia for it you can believe them now? LOL!
You are gullible.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
08 Mar 23
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
That sounds about right. Biden is a pro-Ukraine saboteur.
Biden openly saying he was going to do it isn't enough to convince you?

After falsely blaming Russia for it you can believe them now? LOL!
You are gullible.
I never blamed Russia for it, you idiot. The most logical "culprits" were always the Ukrainians.

And no, Biden never said he was going to sabotage Nord Stream and I still don't think we did.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37332
Clock
08 Mar 23

@no1marauder said
I never blamed Russia for it, you idiot. The most logical "culprits" were always the Ukrainians.

And no, Biden never said he was going to sabotage Nord Stream and I still don't think we did.
I’ve given a perfectly logical explanation as to why the Russians would want to raise the spectre of insecurity in the passage of gas through this area by sabotaging a pipeline that they were not using and was only symbolically damaged and fixed within weeks.
If the war has taught us one thing it’s that Ukrainian forces do a good job and if they did I’m amazed that it was fixed within weeks.
By all means spout some more pro Russian anti Ukrainian propaganda hearsay. But the illogical nature of Ukraines motives still needs explaining.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37332
Clock
08 Mar 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
The lead:

"Intelligence and diplomatic officials in the United States and Europe suspect that pro-Ukraine saboteurs may be responsible for explosions in September that severely damaged the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines, an attack that could erode support for Ukraine among the Western nations that have come to its defense against Russia."

https://www.msn.com/en-u ...[text shortened]... e "pro-Russia".

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/was-moscow-car-bomb-staged.194460/page-6
“"Western officials say Ukrainian actors are responsible for a car explosion in August that killed the daughter of Alexander Dugin, a Russian nationalist and ideological ally of President Vladimir Putin. Some officials said that Dugin was the intended target and that Kyiv was admonished over the attack by its Western allies."

Of course they are offering proof of this?
It’s obviously an option given this guys pro war mongering campaign against Ukraine along with his daughter he was instrumental in garnering public support for the invasion and cold blooded murder of thousands of Ukrainian civilians. Even if it’s proven why are you looking for outrage when every pro war extremist in Putin’s circle is a legitimate target for Ukrainian forces.🤷🏻‍♂️
Again some actual proof of either case would be nice.
Stop pretending you’re not pro Russian No1 it’s disgustingly dishonest.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
08 Mar 23
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kevcvs57 said
I’ve given a perfectly logical explanation as to why the Russians would want to raise the spectre of insecurity in the passage of gas through this area by sabotaging a pipeline that they were not using and was only symbolically damaged and fixed within weeks.
If the war has taught us one thing it’s that Ukrainian forces do a good job and if they did I’m amazed that it was f ...[text shortened]... i Ukrainian propaganda hearsay. But the illogical nature of Ukraines motives still needs explaining.
Why do you keep repeating the misinformation the pipeline was "fixed within weeks"? It still hasn't been and likely never will be. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/kremlin-no-decision-yet-repair-nord-stream-gas-pipelines-2022-12-15/

Sure, it's "illogical" for the Ukraine to strike at a Russian economic asset but "logical" for the Russians to do so. That's the reasoning of an idiot.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
08 Mar 23
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kevcvs57 said
“"Western officials say Ukrainian actors are responsible for a car explosion in August that killed the daughter of Alexander Dugin, a Russian nationalist and ideological ally of President Vladimir Putin. Some officials said that Dugin was the intended target and that Kyiv was admonished over the attack by its Western allies."

Of course they are offering proof of this?
...[text shortened]... either case would be nice.
Stop pretending you’re not pro Russian No1 it’s disgustingly dishonest.
No, civilians are not legitimate targets for Russian or Ukranian military forces regardless of their political views. It's a war crime either way.

You've consistently lied about my views and seem to have no shame in doing so. But it seems that you and the others who claimed that the Dugin assassination must have been a false flag have some egg on your faces if you ever have the honesty to admit error (I see no reason to believe you do, however).

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147754
Clock
08 Mar 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
The lead:

"Intelligence and diplomatic officials in the United States and Europe suspect that pro-Ukraine saboteurs may be responsible for explosions in September that severely damaged the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines, an attack that could erode support for Ukraine among the Western nations that have come to its defense against Russia."

https://www.msn.com/en-u ...[text shortened]... e "pro-Russia".

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/was-moscow-car-bomb-staged.194460/page-6
wow…wapo, the democrat state media

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
08 Mar 23
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
"Western officials say Ukrainian actors are responsible for a car explosion in August that killed the daughter of Alexander Dugin, a Russian nationalist and ideological ally of President Vladimir Putin. Some officials said that Dugin was the intended target and that Kyiv was admonished over the attack by its Western allies."

Way back last Summer, I mentioned this possi ...[text shortened]... e "pro-Russia".

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/was-moscow-car-bomb-staged.194460/page-6
You were not called "pro-Russia" for suggesting Ukrainians were responsible the assassination. You were called that for downplaying the Russian invasion and ignoring legitimate sources showing Putin attacked his own citizens.

And for your hordes of pro-Russia arguments over the entirety of last year.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
08 Mar 23
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
Well, it didn’t make sense that Russia would be responsible for that anyway.
That is the most logical conclusion. But just as a review:

1) Russia fabricated wo assignation claims last year
2) One of those fabricated claims was an alleged car-bombing, just like the one in the OP.
3) Putin is not only a well-known murderer but was accused of killing scores of his own people just to fuel propaganda
4) The bombing itself was suspicious; the bomb could've easily been detonated to kill Putin's ally Dugin...but for some reason only detonated after he, for some odd reason, switched cars with his daughter, killing the less important figure instead of him.
5) Just like the other fabricated "assassinations" from that year, Putin used this as propaganda against the Ukrainian government

Sources for all these were provided in the thread link in the OP. I merely raised a possibility based on Russia's past actions, I never claimed this actually happened. I even said as much in the thread No1 brought up.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
08 Mar 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
You were not called "pro-Russia" for suggesting Ukrainians were responsible the assassination. You were called that for downplaying the Russian invasion and ignoring legitimate sources showing Putin attacked his own citizens.

And for your hordes of pro-Russia arguments over the entirety of last year.
It remains a lie; I have labeled the invasion a "Crime Against Peace".

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
08 Mar 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
It remains a lie; I have labeled the invasion a "Crime Against Peace".
Just like when Duchess "criticized" China's treatment of Muslims while attacking any report of China mistreating Muslims. So too with you and the invasion.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37332
Clock
08 Mar 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
Why do you keep repeating the misinformation the pipeline was "fixed within weeks"? It still hasn't been and likely never will be. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/kremlin-no-decision-yet-repair-nord-stream-gas-pipelines-2022-12-15/

Sure, it's "illogical" for the Ukraine to strike at a Russian economic asset but "logical" for the Russians to do so. That's the reasoning of an idiot.
I explained in full the logic behind a possible rationale for Russia sabotaging its own pipeline I’m not going over it again but basically it creates an air of insecurity in terms of Norway’s ability to supply Europe with gas through the area.
You’ve yet to explain the logic of Ukraine risking serious blowback by sabotaging an unused Russian pipeline.
As for pipeline not being fixed it just strengthens the argument that Russia has no practical use for a pipeline that sanctions have rendered irrelevant.
I didn’t snatch the timeline of weeks out if the either, it seemed to be the consensus when it happened. I guess if Russia never bothers to fix it you’ll claim that it was so badly damaged that it was unfixable.
I have never claimed to know the facts behind either event but it’s reasonable to theorise based on logic but unlike you I do not claim to know anything as a fact.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37332
Clock
08 Mar 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
It remains a lie; I have labeled the invasion a "Crime Against Peace".
You are on the left wing of the democrat party, are you claiming that wing is not pro Russian in so far as it’s anti nato and thinks Ukraine could do worse than being subsumed into Russia
I make no claims of neutrality in this issue I am avidly pro Ukrainian and anti Putin regime and its expansionist policies.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.